Improving bypass performance and passage success of Atlantic salmon smolts at an old fish-hostile hydroelectric power station: a challenging task
peer reviewed Old hydroelectric power stations often provide unsafe migration routes to fish, apart from passing through mobile gates during high flow. The installation of retrofitted bypass is considered to be a potential solution to improve fish passage at such old structures, but their performanc...
Published in: | Ecological Engineering |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/255133 https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/255133/1/Ovidioetal2021_Ecological_Engineering_smolt.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106148 |
Summary: | peer reviewed Old hydroelectric power stations often provide unsafe migration routes to fish, apart from passing through mobile gates during high flow. The installation of retrofitted bypass is considered to be a potential solution to improve fish passage at such old structures, but their performances are often insufficient. In the Ambl`eve River (Belgium), a mobile 3.3 m high dam feeds two principal Francis turbines (12 + 14 m3 s-1) and is equipped with three mobile gates, a modern vertical slot upstream fish pass and a retrofitted downstream bypass functioning at a very low flow (1% of maximum turbined flow). A bypassed river section (length 8.4 km) downstream of the dam was set at 3 m3 s-1 and supplies a Francis microturbine. From 2015 to 2016, we used 1150 hatchery Atlantic salmon smolts (Salmo salar), and we placed antennae with automatic radio-frequency identification (RFID) stations to analyse the migration routes used (n = 5). We tested the attraction efficiency and the performance of the bypass with and without the placement of a guidance system at the entrance and examined the proportion of smolt passage at the different migration routes under three functioning configurations. The placement of the guidance system markedly improved the attraction efficiency and the overall passage efficiency. The median time spent at the entrance of the bypass was from 7 to 12 min, and the time spent near the entrance of the bypass was less than 1 h for 67.1% (release 1), 88.2% (release 2) and 63.7% (release 3) of the smolts. During the threerelease events, the smolts arrived near the entrance of the bypass mostly during the dusk and dark periods (87.5%, 96.0% and 95.5%, for releases 1, 2 and 3, respectively). In a configuration without opening a mobile gate, the bypass was the most used migration route, followed by the microturbine and the main turbine. Stopping the microturbine and opening a mobile gate has consequences of making it the first choice of passage followed by the main turbine and the bypass. The ... |
---|