Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease : implementation, utilization, and barriers in clinical practice in Scandinavia
Funding Information: JB Speaker-, educational- and advisory board consultancy fees and research grants from Abbvie, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, BMS, Gilead and Janssen-Cilag. Funding Information: KHB funding from Akershus University Hospital and speaker for Janssen-Cilag. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Au...
Published in: | Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/4072 https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2022.2108684 |
Summary: | Funding Information: JB Speaker-, educational- and advisory board consultancy fees and research grants from Abbvie, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, BMS, Gilead and Janssen-Cilag. Funding Information: KHB funding from Akershus University Hospital and speaker for Janssen-Cilag. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies. RESULTS: In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01-0.09], p < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway (p < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week (p = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%. CONCLUSION: TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines ... |
---|