Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Laeknafelag Islands. All rights reserved. INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has been standard treatment for patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) but percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be a good alternative. Our aim was to eva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Læknablaðið
Main Authors: Reynisdóttir, Heiðrún Ósk, Kristjánsdóttir, Margrét Kristín, Mogensen, Brynjólfur Árni, Andersen, Karl Konráð, Guðbjartsson, Tómas, Sigurðsson, Martin Ingi, Guðmundsdóttir, Ingibjörg Jóna
Other Authors: Skrifstofa meðferðarsviðs, Önnur svið, Læknadeild, Skrifstofa aðgerðasviðs, Hjarta- og æðaþjónusta, Skurðstofur og gjörgæsla, Landspítali
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Icelandic
Published: 2022
Subjects:
PCI
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3648
https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704
id ftopinvisindi:oai:opinvisindi.is:20.500.11815/3648
record_format openpolar
spelling ftopinvisindi:oai:opinvisindi.is:20.500.11815/3648 2023-05-15T16:46:56+02:00 Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð? Management of patients with left main stem stenosis in Iceland 2010-2020PCI or CABG Reynisdóttir, Heiðrún Ósk Kristjánsdóttir, Margrét Kristín Mogensen, Brynjólfur Árni Andersen, Karl Konráð Guðbjartsson, Tómas Sigurðsson, Martin Ingi Guðmundsdóttir, Ingibjörg Jóna Skrifstofa meðferðarsviðs Önnur svið Læknadeild Skrifstofa aðgerðasviðs Hjarta- og æðaþjónusta Skurðstofur og gjörgæsla Landspítali 2022-09-08 8 387-394 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3648 https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704 is ice Læknablaðið; 108(9) http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137125951&partnerID=8YFLogxK Reynisdóttir , H Ó , Kristjánsdóttir , M K , Mogensen , B Á , Andersen , K K , Guðbjartsson , T , Sigurðsson , M I & Guðmundsdóttir , I J 2022 , ' Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð? ' , Læknablaðið , bind. 108 , nr. 9 , bls. 387-394 . https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704 1670-4959 PURE: 63499346 PURE UUID: 7ba354fa-5502-4dd6-b087-d93a995f8eaa Scopus: 85137125951 unpaywall: 10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3648 36040770 https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Hjarta- og lungnaskurðlæknisfræði Svæfinga- og gjörgæslulæknisfræði Kransæðasjúkdómar Kransæðavíkkanir Hjartalæknisfræði Constriction Pathologic/complications Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging Humans Iceland/epidemiology Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome coronary artery disease PCI CABG left main stem stenosis Læknisfræði (allt) /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article 2022 ftopinvisindi https://doi.org/20.500.11815/364810.17992/lbl.2022.09.704 2023-03-22T23:52:16Z Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Laeknafelag Islands. All rights reserved. INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has been standard treatment for patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) but percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be a good alternative. Our aim was to evaluate revascularization of LMCAD-patients in Iceland and treatment changes in recent years. We also assessed the impact of patient background factors on treatment choice and long-term survival. METHODS: This retrospective, population-based registry-study analyzed data from the SCAAR-SWEDEHEART database. Patients with significant LMCAD on coronary angiography in Iceland 2010-2020, without previous history of CABG or contraindication for surgery were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to study long-term survival and COX-regression analysis to adjust for predictor variables. FINDINGS: Of 702 LMCAD patients, 195 were treated with PCI, 460 with CABG and 47 with medical therapy. The widest age-range was in the PCI group and the mean age was highest in the medical therapy group. Patients with LMCAD and concomitant three vessel disease or heart valve disese were mostly treated with CABG (76.1% and 84.4%). The majority of patients with LMCAD only were treated with PCI, as well as patients presenting with STEMI or in cardiogenic shock (67.1% and 70.0%). The proportion of patients treated with PCI increased from 19.8% in 2010-2015 to 42.7% in 2016-2020. There was no significant difference in survival between the PCI and CABG-groups (p=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LMCAD the main factors determining treatment choice are age, anatomical complexity and acuteness. There has been a significant increase in LMCAD patients treated with PCI. Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Opin vísindi (Iceland) Hjarta ENVELOPE(13.784,13.784,66.771,66.771) Meier ENVELOPE(-45.900,-45.900,-60.633,-60.633) Læknablaðið 108 09 387 394
institution Open Polar
collection Opin vísindi (Iceland)
op_collection_id ftopinvisindi
language Icelandic
topic Hjarta- og lungnaskurðlæknisfræði
Svæfinga- og gjörgæslulæknisfræði
Kransæðasjúkdómar
Kransæðavíkkanir
Hjartalæknisfræði
Constriction
Pathologic/complications
Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
Humans
Iceland/epidemiology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
coronary artery disease
PCI
CABG
left main stem stenosis
Læknisfræði (allt)
spellingShingle Hjarta- og lungnaskurðlæknisfræði
Svæfinga- og gjörgæslulæknisfræði
Kransæðasjúkdómar
Kransæðavíkkanir
Hjartalæknisfræði
Constriction
Pathologic/complications
Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
Humans
Iceland/epidemiology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
coronary artery disease
PCI
CABG
left main stem stenosis
Læknisfræði (allt)
Reynisdóttir, Heiðrún Ósk
Kristjánsdóttir, Margrét Kristín
Mogensen, Brynjólfur Árni
Andersen, Karl Konráð
Guðbjartsson, Tómas
Sigurðsson, Martin Ingi
Guðmundsdóttir, Ingibjörg Jóna
Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?
topic_facet Hjarta- og lungnaskurðlæknisfræði
Svæfinga- og gjörgæslulæknisfræði
Kransæðasjúkdómar
Kransæðavíkkanir
Hjartalæknisfræði
Constriction
Pathologic/complications
Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
Humans
Iceland/epidemiology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
coronary artery disease
PCI
CABG
left main stem stenosis
Læknisfræði (allt)
description Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Laeknafelag Islands. All rights reserved. INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has been standard treatment for patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) but percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be a good alternative. Our aim was to evaluate revascularization of LMCAD-patients in Iceland and treatment changes in recent years. We also assessed the impact of patient background factors on treatment choice and long-term survival. METHODS: This retrospective, population-based registry-study analyzed data from the SCAAR-SWEDEHEART database. Patients with significant LMCAD on coronary angiography in Iceland 2010-2020, without previous history of CABG or contraindication for surgery were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to study long-term survival and COX-regression analysis to adjust for predictor variables. FINDINGS: Of 702 LMCAD patients, 195 were treated with PCI, 460 with CABG and 47 with medical therapy. The widest age-range was in the PCI group and the mean age was highest in the medical therapy group. Patients with LMCAD and concomitant three vessel disease or heart valve disese were mostly treated with CABG (76.1% and 84.4%). The majority of patients with LMCAD only were treated with PCI, as well as patients presenting with STEMI or in cardiogenic shock (67.1% and 70.0%). The proportion of patients treated with PCI increased from 19.8% in 2010-2015 to 42.7% in 2016-2020. There was no significant difference in survival between the PCI and CABG-groups (p=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LMCAD the main factors determining treatment choice are age, anatomical complexity and acuteness. There has been a significant increase in LMCAD patients treated with PCI. Peer reviewed
author2 Skrifstofa meðferðarsviðs
Önnur svið
Læknadeild
Skrifstofa aðgerðasviðs
Hjarta- og æðaþjónusta
Skurðstofur og gjörgæsla
Landspítali
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Reynisdóttir, Heiðrún Ósk
Kristjánsdóttir, Margrét Kristín
Mogensen, Brynjólfur Árni
Andersen, Karl Konráð
Guðbjartsson, Tómas
Sigurðsson, Martin Ingi
Guðmundsdóttir, Ingibjörg Jóna
author_facet Reynisdóttir, Heiðrún Ósk
Kristjánsdóttir, Margrét Kristín
Mogensen, Brynjólfur Árni
Andersen, Karl Konráð
Guðbjartsson, Tómas
Sigurðsson, Martin Ingi
Guðmundsdóttir, Ingibjörg Jóna
author_sort Reynisdóttir, Heiðrún Ósk
title Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?
title_short Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?
title_full Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?
title_fullStr Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?
title_full_unstemmed Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: : Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?
title_sort meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á íslandi: : víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð?
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3648
https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704
long_lat ENVELOPE(13.784,13.784,66.771,66.771)
ENVELOPE(-45.900,-45.900,-60.633,-60.633)
geographic Hjarta
Meier
geographic_facet Hjarta
Meier
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation Læknablaðið; 108(9)
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137125951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
Reynisdóttir , H Ó , Kristjánsdóttir , M K , Mogensen , B Á , Andersen , K K , Guðbjartsson , T , Sigurðsson , M I & Guðmundsdóttir , I J 2022 , ' Meðferð höfuðstofnsþrenginga á Íslandi: Víkkun, hjáveituaðgerð eða lyfjameðferð? ' , Læknablaðið , bind. 108 , nr. 9 , bls. 387-394 . https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704
1670-4959
PURE: 63499346
PURE UUID: 7ba354fa-5502-4dd6-b087-d93a995f8eaa
Scopus: 85137125951
unpaywall: 10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3648
36040770
https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2022.09.704
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.11815/364810.17992/lbl.2022.09.704
container_title Læknablaðið
container_volume 108
container_issue 09
container_start_page 387
op_container_end_page 394
_version_ 1766037029104123904