Antibiotic resistance among major pathogens compared to hospital treatment guidelines and antibiotic use in Nordic hospitals 2010–2018

This work has been made possible by funding from Region Östergötland and VINNOVA Sweden's innovation agency. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. BACKGROUND: The Nordic countries have comparable nationwide antibiotic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Infectious Diseases
Main Authors: Möller, Vidar, Östholm-Balkhed, Åse, Berild, Dag, Fredriksson, Mats, Gottfreðsson, Magnús, Holmbom, Martin, Järvinen, Asko, Kristjánsson, Már, Rydell, Ulf, Sönksen, Ute Wolff, Kolmos, Hans Joern, Hanberger, Håkan
Other Authors: Faculty of Medicine, Other departments, Internal Medicine and Emergency Services, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2942
https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2021.1910338
Description
Summary:This work has been made possible by funding from Region Östergötland and VINNOVA Sweden's innovation agency. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. BACKGROUND: The Nordic countries have comparable nationwide antibiotic resistance surveillance systems and individual antibiotic stewardship programmes. The aim of this study was to assess antibiotic resistance among major pathogens in relation to practice guidelines for hospital antibiotic treatment and antibiotic use in Nordic countries 2010-2018. METHODS: Antibiotic resistance among invasive isolates from 2010-2018 and aggregated antibiotic use were obtained from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Hospital practice guidelines were obtained from national or regional guidelines. RESULTS: Antibiotic resistance levels among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were similar in all Nordic countries in 2018 and low compared to the European mean. Guidelines for acute pyelonephritis varied; 2nd generation cephalosporin (Finland), 3rd generation cephalosporins (Sweden, Norway), ampicillin with an aminoglycoside or aminoglycoside monotherapy (Denmark, Iceland and Norway). Corresponding guidelines for sepsis of unknown origin were 2nd (Finland) or 3rd (Sweden, Norway, Iceland) generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, (Sweden) combinations of penicillin with an aminoglycoside (Norway, Denmark), or piperacillin-tazobactam (all Nordic countries). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rates were 0-2% and empirical treatment with anti-MRSA antibiotics was not recommended in any country. Rates of penicillin non-susceptibility among Streptococcus pneumoniae were low (<10%) except in Finland and Iceland (<15%), but benzylpenicillin was recommended for community-acquired pneumonia in all countries. CONCLUSION: Despite similar resistance rates among Enterobacteriaceae there were differences in practice guidelines for pyelonephritis and sepsis. National surveillance of ...