Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures

Publisher's version (útgefin grein) Questionnaire design is routinely guided by classic experiments on question form, wording, and context conducted decades ago. This article explores whether two question order effects (one due to the norm of evenhandedness and the other due to subtraction or p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociological Methods & Research
Main Authors: Stark, Tobias H., Silber, Henning, Krosnick, Jon A., Blom, Annelies G., Aoyagi, Midori, Belchior, Ana, Bosnjak, Michael, Clement, Sanne Lund, John, Melvin, Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea, Lawson, Karen, Lynn, Peter, Martinsson, Johan, Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte, Tvinnereim, Endre, Yu, Ruoh-rong
Other Authors: Social Science Research Institute (UI), Félagsvísindastofnun (HÍ), Félagsvísindasvið (HÍ), School of Social Sciences (UI), Háskóli Íslands, University of Iceland
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2259
https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304
id ftopinvisindi:oai:opinvisindi.is:20.500.11815/2259
record_format openpolar
spelling ftopinvisindi:oai:opinvisindi.is:20.500.11815/2259 2023-05-15T16:52:07+02:00 Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures Stark, Tobias H. Silber, Henning Krosnick, Jon A. Blom, Annelies G. Aoyagi, Midori Belchior, Ana Bosnjak, Michael Clement, Sanne Lund John, Melvin Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea Lawson, Karen Lynn, Peter Martinsson, Johan Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte Tvinnereim, Endre Yu, Ruoh-rong Social Science Research Institute (UI) Félagsvísindastofnun (HÍ) Félagsvísindasvið (HÍ) School of Social Sciences (UI) Háskóli Íslands University of Iceland 2018-02-27 567-602 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2259 https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304 en eng SAGE Publications Sociological Methods & Research;49(3) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124117747304 Stark, T.H., Silber, H., Krosnick, J.A., Blom, A.G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S.L., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G.A., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., Yu, R.-R., 2020. Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures. Sociological Methods & Research doi:10.1177/0049124117747304 0049-1241 1552-8294 (eISSN) https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2259 Sociological Methods and Research doi:10.1177/0049124117747304 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Cross-cultural Perceptual contrast Question order effects Questionnaire design Survey methods Spurningalistar Aðferðafræði Kannanir Þvermenningarlegur samanburður info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2018 ftopinvisindi https://doi.org/20.500.11815/2259 https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304 2022-11-18T06:52:04Z Publisher's version (útgefin grein) Questionnaire design is routinely guided by classic experiments on question form, wording, and context conducted decades ago. This article explores whether two question order effects (one due to the norm of evenhandedness and the other due to subtraction or perceptual contrast) appear in surveys of probability samples in the United States and 11 other countries (Canada, Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom; N = 25,640). Advancing theory of question order effects, we propose necessary conditions for each effect to occur, and found that the effects occurred in the nations where these necessary conditions were met. Surprisingly, the abortion question order effect even appeared in some countries in which the necessary condition was not met, suggesting that the question order effect there (and perhaps elsewhere) was not due to subtraction or perceptual contrast. The question order effects were not moderated by education. The strength of the effect due to the norm of evenhandedness was correlated with various cultural characteristics of the nations. Strong support was observed for the form-resistant correlation hypothesis. This article uses data from the German Internet Panel waves 8 (doi:10.4232/1.12614) and 9 (doi:10.4232/1.12615). A study description can be found in . The German Internet Panel is the central data collection (project Z1) of Collaborative Research Center 884 “Political Economy of Reforms” (SFB 884) at the University of Mannheim and is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (LISS) Panel data were collected by CentERdata (Tilburg University, the Netherlands) through its Measurement and Experimentation in the Social Sciences (MESS) project funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grant number 176.010.2005.017). This article uses data from the GESIS Panel (doi:10.4232/1.12658). The development of the GESIS ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Opin vísindi (Iceland) Canada Norway Sociological Methods & Research 49 3 567 602
institution Open Polar
collection Opin vísindi (Iceland)
op_collection_id ftopinvisindi
language English
topic Cross-cultural
Perceptual contrast
Question order effects
Questionnaire design
Survey methods
Spurningalistar
Aðferðafræði
Kannanir
Þvermenningarlegur samanburður
spellingShingle Cross-cultural
Perceptual contrast
Question order effects
Questionnaire design
Survey methods
Spurningalistar
Aðferðafræði
Kannanir
Þvermenningarlegur samanburður
Stark, Tobias H.
Silber, Henning
Krosnick, Jon A.
Blom, Annelies G.
Aoyagi, Midori
Belchior, Ana
Bosnjak, Michael
Clement, Sanne Lund
John, Melvin
Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea
Lawson, Karen
Lynn, Peter
Martinsson, Johan
Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte
Tvinnereim, Endre
Yu, Ruoh-rong
Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures
topic_facet Cross-cultural
Perceptual contrast
Question order effects
Questionnaire design
Survey methods
Spurningalistar
Aðferðafræði
Kannanir
Þvermenningarlegur samanburður
description Publisher's version (útgefin grein) Questionnaire design is routinely guided by classic experiments on question form, wording, and context conducted decades ago. This article explores whether two question order effects (one due to the norm of evenhandedness and the other due to subtraction or perceptual contrast) appear in surveys of probability samples in the United States and 11 other countries (Canada, Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom; N = 25,640). Advancing theory of question order effects, we propose necessary conditions for each effect to occur, and found that the effects occurred in the nations where these necessary conditions were met. Surprisingly, the abortion question order effect even appeared in some countries in which the necessary condition was not met, suggesting that the question order effect there (and perhaps elsewhere) was not due to subtraction or perceptual contrast. The question order effects were not moderated by education. The strength of the effect due to the norm of evenhandedness was correlated with various cultural characteristics of the nations. Strong support was observed for the form-resistant correlation hypothesis. This article uses data from the German Internet Panel waves 8 (doi:10.4232/1.12614) and 9 (doi:10.4232/1.12615). A study description can be found in . The German Internet Panel is the central data collection (project Z1) of Collaborative Research Center 884 “Political Economy of Reforms” (SFB 884) at the University of Mannheim and is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences (LISS) Panel data were collected by CentERdata (Tilburg University, the Netherlands) through its Measurement and Experimentation in the Social Sciences (MESS) project funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grant number 176.010.2005.017). This article uses data from the GESIS Panel (doi:10.4232/1.12658). The development of the GESIS ...
author2 Social Science Research Institute (UI)
Félagsvísindastofnun (HÍ)
Félagsvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Social Sciences (UI)
Háskóli Íslands
University of Iceland
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Stark, Tobias H.
Silber, Henning
Krosnick, Jon A.
Blom, Annelies G.
Aoyagi, Midori
Belchior, Ana
Bosnjak, Michael
Clement, Sanne Lund
John, Melvin
Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea
Lawson, Karen
Lynn, Peter
Martinsson, Johan
Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte
Tvinnereim, Endre
Yu, Ruoh-rong
author_facet Stark, Tobias H.
Silber, Henning
Krosnick, Jon A.
Blom, Annelies G.
Aoyagi, Midori
Belchior, Ana
Bosnjak, Michael
Clement, Sanne Lund
John, Melvin
Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea
Lawson, Karen
Lynn, Peter
Martinsson, Johan
Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte
Tvinnereim, Endre
Yu, Ruoh-rong
author_sort Stark, Tobias H.
title Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures
title_short Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures
title_full Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures
title_fullStr Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures
title_full_unstemmed Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures
title_sort generalization of classic question order effects across cultures
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2018
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2259
https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304
geographic Canada
Norway
geographic_facet Canada
Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation Sociological Methods & Research;49(3)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124117747304
Stark, T.H., Silber, H., Krosnick, J.A., Blom, A.G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S.L., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G.A., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., Yu, R.-R., 2020. Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures. Sociological Methods & Research doi:10.1177/0049124117747304
0049-1241
1552-8294 (eISSN)
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2259
Sociological Methods and Research
doi:10.1177/0049124117747304
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.11815/2259
https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304
container_title Sociological Methods & Research
container_volume 49
container_issue 3
container_start_page 567
op_container_end_page 602
_version_ 1766042262170501120