Biological Diversity in the Patent System

Biological diversity in the patent system is an enduring focus of controversy but empirical analysis of the presence of biodiversity in the patent system has been limited. To address this problem we text mined 11 million patent documents for 6 million Latin species names from the Global Names Index...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Authors: Oldham, Paul, Hall, Stephen, Forero, Oscar
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLOS) 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6
https://openresearchlibrary.org/ext/api/media/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6/assets/external_content.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078737
id ftopenresearchl:oai:biblioboard.com:bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6
record_format openpolar
spelling ftopenresearchl:oai:biblioboard.com:bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6 2024-09-15T17:48:43+00:00 Biological Diversity in the Patent System Oldham, Paul Hall, Stephen Forero, Oscar 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z application/pdf https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6 https://openresearchlibrary.org/ext/api/media/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6/assets/external_content.pdf https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078737 English eng Public Library of Science (PLOS) https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6 https://openresearchlibrary.org/ext/api/media/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6/assets/external_content.pdf doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078737 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode MODID-55c385867f4:Public Library of Science (PLOS) ARTICLE 2013 ftopenresearchl https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078737 2024-08-26T09:50:50Z Biological diversity in the patent system is an enduring focus of controversy but empirical analysis of the presence of biodiversity in the patent system has been limited. To address this problem we text mined 11 million patent documents for 6 million Latin species names from the Global Names Index (GNI) established by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and Encyclopedia of Life (EOL). We identified 76,274 full Latin species names from 23,882 genera in 767,955 patent documents. 25,595 species appeared in the claims section of 136,880 patent documents. This reveals that human innovative activity involving biodiversity in the patent system focuses on approximately 4% of taxonomically described species and between 0.8‰ÛÒ1% of predicted global species. In this article we identify the major features of the patent landscape for biological diversity by focusing on key areas including pharmaceuticals, neglected diseases, traditional medicines, genetic engineering, foods, biocides, marine genetic resources and Antarctica. We conclude that the narrow focus of human innovative activity and ownership of genetic resources is unlikely to be in the long term interest of humanity. We argue that a broader spectrum of biodiversity needs to be opened up to research and development based on the principles of equitable benefit-sharing, respect for the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity, human rights and ethics. Finally, we argue that alternative models of innovation, such as open source and commons models, are required to open up biodiversity for research that addresses actual and neglected areas of human need. The research aims to inform the implementation of the 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization and international debates directed to the governance of genetic resources. Our research also aims to inform debates under the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Open Research Library PLoS ONE 8 11 e78737
institution Open Polar
collection Open Research Library
op_collection_id ftopenresearchl
language English
description Biological diversity in the patent system is an enduring focus of controversy but empirical analysis of the presence of biodiversity in the patent system has been limited. To address this problem we text mined 11 million patent documents for 6 million Latin species names from the Global Names Index (GNI) established by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and Encyclopedia of Life (EOL). We identified 76,274 full Latin species names from 23,882 genera in 767,955 patent documents. 25,595 species appeared in the claims section of 136,880 patent documents. This reveals that human innovative activity involving biodiversity in the patent system focuses on approximately 4% of taxonomically described species and between 0.8‰ÛÒ1% of predicted global species. In this article we identify the major features of the patent landscape for biological diversity by focusing on key areas including pharmaceuticals, neglected diseases, traditional medicines, genetic engineering, foods, biocides, marine genetic resources and Antarctica. We conclude that the narrow focus of human innovative activity and ownership of genetic resources is unlikely to be in the long term interest of humanity. We argue that a broader spectrum of biodiversity needs to be opened up to research and development based on the principles of equitable benefit-sharing, respect for the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity, human rights and ethics. Finally, we argue that alternative models of innovation, such as open source and commons models, are required to open up biodiversity for research that addresses actual and neglected areas of human need. The research aims to inform the implementation of the 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization and international debates directed to the governance of genetic resources. Our research also aims to inform debates under the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Oldham, Paul
Hall, Stephen
Forero, Oscar
spellingShingle Oldham, Paul
Hall, Stephen
Forero, Oscar
Biological Diversity in the Patent System
author_facet Oldham, Paul
Hall, Stephen
Forero, Oscar
author_sort Oldham, Paul
title Biological Diversity in the Patent System
title_short Biological Diversity in the Patent System
title_full Biological Diversity in the Patent System
title_fullStr Biological Diversity in the Patent System
title_full_unstemmed Biological Diversity in the Patent System
title_sort biological diversity in the patent system
publisher Public Library of Science (PLOS)
publishDate 2013
url https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6
https://openresearchlibrary.org/ext/api/media/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6/assets/external_content.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078737
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source MODID-55c385867f4:Public Library of Science (PLOS)
op_relation https://openresearchlibrary.org/viewer/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6
https://openresearchlibrary.org/ext/api/media/bd07ab47-743e-49f5-9c11-44496e3eedf6/assets/external_content.pdf
doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078737
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078737
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 8
container_issue 11
container_start_page e78737
_version_ 1810290230105735168