Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene

This article presents that decolonizing cannot happen without acknowledging the role of land relations in constituting data and radically reconstituting what we are governing when we claim to govern ‘data.’ To this end, it reflects upon how the juxtaposition of the ‘data colonialism’ and the ‘Anthro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Technology and Regulation
Main Author: U+16DE, diane
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Open Press TiU 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://techreg.org/article/view/13299
https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930
_version_ 1825505811879690240
author U+16DE, diane
author_facet U+16DE, diane
author_sort U+16DE, diane
collection openjournals.nl
container_start_page 47
container_title Technology and Regulation
container_volume 2024
description This article presents that decolonizing cannot happen without acknowledging the role of land relations in constituting data and radically reconstituting what we are governing when we claim to govern ‘data.’ To this end, it reflects upon how the juxtaposition of the ‘data colonialism’ and the ‘Anthropocene’ discourses can be productive by highlighting their common settler colonial impulses in understanding the categories of the ‘material’ and the ‘epistemological’ as distinctive. Next, the article draws upon the Place-Thought framework proposed by Anishinaabe-Haudenosaunee scholar Vanessa Watts and others to argue that in addition to being a demand for giving land titles to Indigenous peoples, #LandBack movements should be understood as a decolonizing call for realizing the seamless coherence of the material-epistemological, both outside and within Europe. The last section proposes earthy data as decolonizing tactics against the settler understandings of data.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre anishina*
genre_facet anishina*
id ftopenjournalsnl:oai:ojs.www.openjournals.localhost:article/13299
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftopenjournalsnl
op_container_end_page 62
op_doi https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930
op_relation https://techreg.org/article/view/13299/20875
https://techreg.org/article/view/13299
doi:10.71265/rg0jc930
op_rights Copyright (c) 2024 diane U+16DE
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
op_source Technology and Regulation; Vol. 2024 (2024); 47-62
2666-139X
publishDate 2024
publisher Open Press TiU
record_format openpolar
spelling ftopenjournalsnl:oai:ojs.www.openjournals.localhost:article/13299 2025-03-02T15:13:15+00:00 Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene U+16DE, diane 2024-03-22 application/pdf https://techreg.org/article/view/13299 https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930 eng eng Open Press TiU https://techreg.org/article/view/13299/20875 https://techreg.org/article/view/13299 doi:10.71265/rg0jc930 Copyright (c) 2024 diane U+16DE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Technology and Regulation; Vol. 2024 (2024); 47-62 2666-139X decolonisation decolonization data governance Anthropocene Land Back race racial form analytics of race Digital earth data production Place-Thought Framework Indigenous theories of knowledge info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2024 ftopenjournalsnl https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930 2025-02-12T00:47:39Z This article presents that decolonizing cannot happen without acknowledging the role of land relations in constituting data and radically reconstituting what we are governing when we claim to govern ‘data.’ To this end, it reflects upon how the juxtaposition of the ‘data colonialism’ and the ‘Anthropocene’ discourses can be productive by highlighting their common settler colonial impulses in understanding the categories of the ‘material’ and the ‘epistemological’ as distinctive. Next, the article draws upon the Place-Thought framework proposed by Anishinaabe-Haudenosaunee scholar Vanessa Watts and others to argue that in addition to being a demand for giving land titles to Indigenous peoples, #LandBack movements should be understood as a decolonizing call for realizing the seamless coherence of the material-epistemological, both outside and within Europe. The last section proposes earthy data as decolonizing tactics against the settler understandings of data. Article in Journal/Newspaper anishina* openjournals.nl Technology and Regulation 2024 47 62
spellingShingle decolonisation
decolonization
data governance
Anthropocene
Land Back
race
racial form
analytics of race
Digital earth
data production
Place-Thought Framework
Indigenous theories of knowledge
U+16DE, diane
Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene
title Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene
title_full Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene
title_fullStr Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene
title_full_unstemmed Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene
title_short Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene
title_sort tactics of earthy data: decolonising for the anthropocene
topic decolonisation
decolonization
data governance
Anthropocene
Land Back
race
racial form
analytics of race
Digital earth
data production
Place-Thought Framework
Indigenous theories of knowledge
topic_facet decolonisation
decolonization
data governance
Anthropocene
Land Back
race
racial form
analytics of race
Digital earth
data production
Place-Thought Framework
Indigenous theories of knowledge
url https://techreg.org/article/view/13299
https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930