Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene
This article presents that decolonizing cannot happen without acknowledging the role of land relations in constituting data and radically reconstituting what we are governing when we claim to govern ‘data.’ To this end, it reflects upon how the juxtaposition of the ‘data colonialism’ and the ‘Anthro...
Published in: | Technology and Regulation |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Press TiU
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://techreg.org/article/view/13299 https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930 |
_version_ | 1825505811879690240 |
---|---|
author | U+16DE, diane |
author_facet | U+16DE, diane |
author_sort | U+16DE, diane |
collection | openjournals.nl |
container_start_page | 47 |
container_title | Technology and Regulation |
container_volume | 2024 |
description | This article presents that decolonizing cannot happen without acknowledging the role of land relations in constituting data and radically reconstituting what we are governing when we claim to govern ‘data.’ To this end, it reflects upon how the juxtaposition of the ‘data colonialism’ and the ‘Anthropocene’ discourses can be productive by highlighting their common settler colonial impulses in understanding the categories of the ‘material’ and the ‘epistemological’ as distinctive. Next, the article draws upon the Place-Thought framework proposed by Anishinaabe-Haudenosaunee scholar Vanessa Watts and others to argue that in addition to being a demand for giving land titles to Indigenous peoples, #LandBack movements should be understood as a decolonizing call for realizing the seamless coherence of the material-epistemological, both outside and within Europe. The last section proposes earthy data as decolonizing tactics against the settler understandings of data. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | anishina* |
genre_facet | anishina* |
id | ftopenjournalsnl:oai:ojs.www.openjournals.localhost:article/13299 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftopenjournalsnl |
op_container_end_page | 62 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930 |
op_relation | https://techreg.org/article/view/13299/20875 https://techreg.org/article/view/13299 doi:10.71265/rg0jc930 |
op_rights | Copyright (c) 2024 diane U+16DE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
op_source | Technology and Regulation; Vol. 2024 (2024); 47-62 2666-139X |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Open Press TiU |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftopenjournalsnl:oai:ojs.www.openjournals.localhost:article/13299 2025-03-02T15:13:15+00:00 Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene U+16DE, diane 2024-03-22 application/pdf https://techreg.org/article/view/13299 https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930 eng eng Open Press TiU https://techreg.org/article/view/13299/20875 https://techreg.org/article/view/13299 doi:10.71265/rg0jc930 Copyright (c) 2024 diane U+16DE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Technology and Regulation; Vol. 2024 (2024); 47-62 2666-139X decolonisation decolonization data governance Anthropocene Land Back race racial form analytics of race Digital earth data production Place-Thought Framework Indigenous theories of knowledge info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article 2024 ftopenjournalsnl https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930 2025-02-12T00:47:39Z This article presents that decolonizing cannot happen without acknowledging the role of land relations in constituting data and radically reconstituting what we are governing when we claim to govern ‘data.’ To this end, it reflects upon how the juxtaposition of the ‘data colonialism’ and the ‘Anthropocene’ discourses can be productive by highlighting their common settler colonial impulses in understanding the categories of the ‘material’ and the ‘epistemological’ as distinctive. Next, the article draws upon the Place-Thought framework proposed by Anishinaabe-Haudenosaunee scholar Vanessa Watts and others to argue that in addition to being a demand for giving land titles to Indigenous peoples, #LandBack movements should be understood as a decolonizing call for realizing the seamless coherence of the material-epistemological, both outside and within Europe. The last section proposes earthy data as decolonizing tactics against the settler understandings of data. Article in Journal/Newspaper anishina* openjournals.nl Technology and Regulation 2024 47 62 |
spellingShingle | decolonisation decolonization data governance Anthropocene Land Back race racial form analytics of race Digital earth data production Place-Thought Framework Indigenous theories of knowledge U+16DE, diane Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene |
title | Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene |
title_full | Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene |
title_fullStr | Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene |
title_full_unstemmed | Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene |
title_short | Tactics of Earthy Data: Decolonising for the Anthropocene |
title_sort | tactics of earthy data: decolonising for the anthropocene |
topic | decolonisation decolonization data governance Anthropocene Land Back race racial form analytics of race Digital earth data production Place-Thought Framework Indigenous theories of knowledge |
topic_facet | decolonisation decolonization data governance Anthropocene Land Back race racial form analytics of race Digital earth data production Place-Thought Framework Indigenous theories of knowledge |
url | https://techreg.org/article/view/13299 https://doi.org/10.71265/rg0jc930 |