Habitat and Season Effects on Small Mammal Bycatch in Live Trapping

• Published in: Biology
• Main Authors: Hotopp, Ines, Walther, Bernd, Fuelling, Olaf, Reil, Daniela, Hesse, Christin, Below, Diana Alexandra, Imholt, Christian, Jacob, Jens
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2022
• Subjects: article; Text; ddc:630; conservation; endangered species; non-target species; rodents; Ugglan traps; voles; Microtus arvalis
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121806; https://www.openagrar.de/receive/openagrar_mods_00085621; https://www.openagrar.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/openagrar_derivate_00051647/2022_0316.pdf; https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/11/12/1806/pdf?version=1670914460

Trapping small mammals is frequently used to study the dynamics, demography, behavior and presence of pathogens. When only particular small mammal species are in the focus of interest, all other species are unnecessary bycatch. We analyzed data from extensive live trapping campaigns conducted over the last decade in Germany, following a consistent standard trapping protocol that resulted in about 18,500 captures of small mammals. Animals were trapped with Ugglan multiple capture traps in grassland, forest and margin habitat. Trap success and the proportion of bycatch were about 30% when target species were common voles (Microtus arvalis) in grassland and common voles and bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) in margins and forests. This was more pronounced in spring and along margins. Species mentioned in the early warning list according to the Red List Germany were higher in numbers and proportion in spring and in grassland. The results will help to avoid periods with enhanced presence of bycatch, including endangered species (if the purpose of the study allows) or to pay particular attention in certain seasons and habitats when the occurrence of bycatch is most likely.