Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability

Using the same approach as in Part I, here it is shown how sampling problems in voluntary observing ship (VOS) data affect conclusions about interannual variations and secular changes of surface heat fluxes. The largest uncertainties in linear trend estimates are found in relatively poorly sampled r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Main Authors: Gulev, Sergej, Jung, Thomas, Ruprecht, Eberhard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: AMS (American Meteorological Society) 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/1/JCLI4008.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4008.1
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:8192
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:8192 2023-05-15T17:06:05+02:00 Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability Gulev, Sergej Jung, Thomas Ruprecht, Eberhard 2007 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/1/JCLI4008.pdf https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4008.1 en eng AMS (American Meteorological Society) https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/1/JCLI4008.pdf Gulev, S., Jung, T. and Ruprecht, E. (2007) Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability. Open Access Journal of Climate, 20 (2). pp. 302-315. DOI 10.1175/JCLI4008.1 <https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4008.1>. doi:10.1175/JCLI4008.1 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Article PeerReviewed 2007 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4008.1 2023-04-07T14:56:13Z Using the same approach as in Part I, here it is shown how sampling problems in voluntary observing ship (VOS) data affect conclusions about interannual variations and secular changes of surface heat fluxes. The largest uncertainties in linear trend estimates are found in relatively poorly sampled regions like the high-latitude North Atlantic and North Pacific as well as the Southern Ocean, where trends can locally show opposite signs when computed from the regularly sampled and undersampled data. Spatial patterns of shorter-period interannual variability, quantified through the EOF analysis, also show remarkable differences between the regularly sampled and undersampled flux datasets in the Labrador Sea and northwest Pacific. In particular, it is shown that in the Labrador Sea region, in contrast to regularly sampled NCEP–NCAR reanalysis fluxes, VOS-like sampled NCEP–NCAR reanalysis fluxes neither show significant interannual variability nor significant trends. These regions, although quite localized covering small parts of the globe, play a crucial role for the coupled atmosphere–ocean system. In the Labrador Sea, for instance, interannual and decadal-scale changes of the surface net heat fluxes are known to affect oceanic convection and, thus, the meridional overturning circulation of the Atlantic Ocean. From a discussion of current atmospheric data assimilation systems it is argued that in poorly sampled regions reanalysis products are superior to VOS-based products for studying interannual and interdecadal variations of atmosphere–ocean interaction. In well-sampled regions, on the other hand, conclusions about surface heat flux variations are relatively insensitive to the choice of the flux products used (VOS versus reanalysis data). The results are confirmed for two different datasets, that is, ECMWF 40-yr Re-Analysis (ERA-40) data and seasonal integrations with a recent version of the ECMWF model in which no actual data were assimilated. Article in Journal/Newspaper Labrador Sea North Atlantic Southern Ocean OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Pacific Southern Ocean Journal of Climate 20 2 302 315
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description Using the same approach as in Part I, here it is shown how sampling problems in voluntary observing ship (VOS) data affect conclusions about interannual variations and secular changes of surface heat fluxes. The largest uncertainties in linear trend estimates are found in relatively poorly sampled regions like the high-latitude North Atlantic and North Pacific as well as the Southern Ocean, where trends can locally show opposite signs when computed from the regularly sampled and undersampled data. Spatial patterns of shorter-period interannual variability, quantified through the EOF analysis, also show remarkable differences between the regularly sampled and undersampled flux datasets in the Labrador Sea and northwest Pacific. In particular, it is shown that in the Labrador Sea region, in contrast to regularly sampled NCEP–NCAR reanalysis fluxes, VOS-like sampled NCEP–NCAR reanalysis fluxes neither show significant interannual variability nor significant trends. These regions, although quite localized covering small parts of the globe, play a crucial role for the coupled atmosphere–ocean system. In the Labrador Sea, for instance, interannual and decadal-scale changes of the surface net heat fluxes are known to affect oceanic convection and, thus, the meridional overturning circulation of the Atlantic Ocean. From a discussion of current atmospheric data assimilation systems it is argued that in poorly sampled regions reanalysis products are superior to VOS-based products for studying interannual and interdecadal variations of atmosphere–ocean interaction. In well-sampled regions, on the other hand, conclusions about surface heat flux variations are relatively insensitive to the choice of the flux products used (VOS versus reanalysis data). The results are confirmed for two different datasets, that is, ECMWF 40-yr Re-Analysis (ERA-40) data and seasonal integrations with a recent version of the ECMWF model in which no actual data were assimilated.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gulev, Sergej
Jung, Thomas
Ruprecht, Eberhard
spellingShingle Gulev, Sergej
Jung, Thomas
Ruprecht, Eberhard
Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability
author_facet Gulev, Sergej
Jung, Thomas
Ruprecht, Eberhard
author_sort Gulev, Sergej
title Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability
title_short Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability
title_full Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability
title_fullStr Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability
title_sort estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the vos observations on air-sea fluxes. part ii. impact on trends and interannual variability
publisher AMS (American Meteorological Society)
publishDate 2007
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/1/JCLI4008.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4008.1
geographic Pacific
Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Pacific
Southern Ocean
genre Labrador Sea
North Atlantic
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Labrador Sea
North Atlantic
Southern Ocean
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/8192/1/JCLI4008.pdf
Gulev, S., Jung, T. and Ruprecht, E. (2007) Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part II. Impact on trends and interannual variability. Open Access Journal of Climate, 20 (2). pp. 302-315. DOI 10.1175/JCLI4008.1 <https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4008.1>.
doi:10.1175/JCLI4008.1
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4008.1
container_title Journal of Climate
container_volume 20
container_issue 2
container_start_page 302
op_container_end_page 315
_version_ 1766061048806244352