The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem

During the Second German Antarctic Expedition 24 stations were visited from Januarv to February 1978 between Bellinghausen Sea and South Georgia. Samples were taken for the determination of phytoplankton composition and biomass as well as for protozooplankton biomass. Primary productivity was measur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: von Bröckel, Klaus
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Institut für Meereskunde 1981
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/1/Broeckel_K_1981.pdf
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:56097
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:56097 2023-05-15T14:07:59+02:00 The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem von Bröckel, Klaus 1981 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/1/Broeckel_K_1981.pdf en eng Institut für Meereskunde https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/1/Broeckel_K_1981.pdf von Bröckel, K. (1981) The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem. Open Access Kieler Meeresforschungen - Sonderheft, 5 . pp. 61-67. cc_by_3.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Article NonPeerReviewed 1981 ftoceanrep 2023-04-07T16:02:31Z During the Second German Antarctic Expedition 24 stations were visited from Januarv to February 1978 between Bellinghausen Sea and South Georgia. Samples were taken for the determination of phytoplankton composition and biomass as well as for protozooplankton biomass. Primary productivity was measured as 14C-uptake for different size classes of the phytoplankton population (< 20, 20-100 and 100-300 μm). Remarkable was the distribution of biomass and primary production within the different phytoplankton size classes. At nearly all stations the major part of the, biomass consisted of nanoplankton forms smaller than 20 μm which were responsible for about 90 % of the production. These tiny organisms were either diatoms (centric or pennate forms), μ-flagellates or dinoflagellates, thus representing the main phytoplankton groups. Protozooplankton cells were found at all stations, their biomass averaged about 16% of the phytoplanktion biomass. The obvious importance of nanoplankton forms as a food supplier for the krill (Euphausia superba) as well as the importance of protozooplankton as a food source and a food competitor for the krill during the Australian autumn are discussed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Euphausia superba OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description During the Second German Antarctic Expedition 24 stations were visited from Januarv to February 1978 between Bellinghausen Sea and South Georgia. Samples were taken for the determination of phytoplankton composition and biomass as well as for protozooplankton biomass. Primary productivity was measured as 14C-uptake for different size classes of the phytoplankton population (< 20, 20-100 and 100-300 μm). Remarkable was the distribution of biomass and primary production within the different phytoplankton size classes. At nearly all stations the major part of the, biomass consisted of nanoplankton forms smaller than 20 μm which were responsible for about 90 % of the production. These tiny organisms were either diatoms (centric or pennate forms), μ-flagellates or dinoflagellates, thus representing the main phytoplankton groups. Protozooplankton cells were found at all stations, their biomass averaged about 16% of the phytoplanktion biomass. The obvious importance of nanoplankton forms as a food supplier for the krill (Euphausia superba) as well as the importance of protozooplankton as a food source and a food competitor for the krill during the Australian autumn are discussed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author von Bröckel, Klaus
spellingShingle von Bröckel, Klaus
The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem
author_facet von Bröckel, Klaus
author_sort von Bröckel, Klaus
title The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem
title_short The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem
title_full The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem
title_fullStr The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem
title_full_unstemmed The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem
title_sort importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic antarctic ecosystem
publisher Institut für Meereskunde
publishDate 1981
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/1/Broeckel_K_1981.pdf
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Euphausia superba
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Euphausia superba
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/56097/1/Broeckel_K_1981.pdf
von Bröckel, K. (1981) The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem. Open Access Kieler Meeresforschungen - Sonderheft, 5 . pp. 61-67.
op_rights cc_by_3.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
_version_ 1766280017295179776