3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures

The interaction between ice sheets and the solid Earth plays an important role for ice-sheet stability and sea-level change and hence for global climate models. Glacial-isostatic adjustment (GIA) models enable simulation of the solid Earth response due to variations in ice-sheet and ocean loading an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bagge, Meike, Klemann, Volker, Steinberger, Bernhard, Latinović, Milena, Thomas, Maik
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/55524/
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:55524
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:55524 2023-05-15T16:40:18+02:00 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures Bagge, Meike Klemann, Volker Steinberger, Bernhard Latinović, Milena Thomas, Maik 2021 https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/55524/ https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479 unknown Bagge, M., Klemann, V., Steinberger, B., Latinović, M. and Thomas, M. (2021) 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures. [PICO] In: EGU General Assembly 2021. , 19.-30.03.2021, Online . DOI 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479 <https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479>. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed 2021 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479 2023-04-07T16:01:26Z The interaction between ice sheets and the solid Earth plays an important role for ice-sheet stability and sea-level change and hence for global climate models. Glacial-isostatic adjustment (GIA) models enable simulation of the solid Earth response due to variations in ice-sheet and ocean loading and prediction of the relative sea-level change. Because the viscoelastic response of the solid Earth depends on both ice-sheet distribution and the Earth’s rheology, independent constraints for the Earth structure in GIA models are beneficial. Seismic tomography models facilitate insights into the Earth’s interior, revealing lateral variability of the mantle viscosity that allows studying its relevance in GIA modeling. Especially, in regions of low mantle viscosity, the predicted surface deformations generated with such 3D GIA models differ considerably from those generated by traditional GIA models with radially symmetric structures. But also, the conversion from seismic velocity variations to viscosity is affected by a set of uncertainties. Here, we apply geodynamically constrained 3D Earth structures. We analyze the impact of conversion parameters (reduction factor in Arrhenius law and radial viscosity profile) on relative sea-level predictions. Furthermore, we focus on exemplary low-viscosity regions like the Cascadian subduction zone and southern Patagonia, which coincide with significant ice-mass changes. Conference Object Ice Sheet OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Patagonia
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language unknown
description The interaction between ice sheets and the solid Earth plays an important role for ice-sheet stability and sea-level change and hence for global climate models. Glacial-isostatic adjustment (GIA) models enable simulation of the solid Earth response due to variations in ice-sheet and ocean loading and prediction of the relative sea-level change. Because the viscoelastic response of the solid Earth depends on both ice-sheet distribution and the Earth’s rheology, independent constraints for the Earth structure in GIA models are beneficial. Seismic tomography models facilitate insights into the Earth’s interior, revealing lateral variability of the mantle viscosity that allows studying its relevance in GIA modeling. Especially, in regions of low mantle viscosity, the predicted surface deformations generated with such 3D GIA models differ considerably from those generated by traditional GIA models with radially symmetric structures. But also, the conversion from seismic velocity variations to viscosity is affected by a set of uncertainties. Here, we apply geodynamically constrained 3D Earth structures. We analyze the impact of conversion parameters (reduction factor in Arrhenius law and radial viscosity profile) on relative sea-level predictions. Furthermore, we focus on exemplary low-viscosity regions like the Cascadian subduction zone and southern Patagonia, which coincide with significant ice-mass changes.
format Conference Object
author Bagge, Meike
Klemann, Volker
Steinberger, Bernhard
Latinović, Milena
Thomas, Maik
spellingShingle Bagge, Meike
Klemann, Volker
Steinberger, Bernhard
Latinović, Milena
Thomas, Maik
3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures
author_facet Bagge, Meike
Klemann, Volker
Steinberger, Bernhard
Latinović, Milena
Thomas, Maik
author_sort Bagge, Meike
title 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures
title_short 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures
title_full 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures
title_fullStr 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures
title_full_unstemmed 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures
title_sort 3d glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained earth structures
publishDate 2021
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/55524/
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479
geographic Patagonia
geographic_facet Patagonia
genre Ice Sheet
genre_facet Ice Sheet
op_relation Bagge, M., Klemann, V., Steinberger, B., Latinović, M. and Thomas, M. (2021) 3D glacial-isostatic adjustment models using geodynamically constrained Earth structures. [PICO] In: EGU General Assembly 2021. , 19.-30.03.2021, Online . DOI 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479 <https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479>.
doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13479
_version_ 1766030679597907968