Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone

The phylogenetic relationships of eight species of incirrate octopodid from western Antarctica were investigated using molecular sequence data from the mitochondrial 16s ribosomal RNA gene. The genus Pareledone, which is endemic to the Antarctic, was found to be polyphyletic. On the basis of this an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Biology
Main Authors: Allcock, A., Piertney, S. B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/1/3962.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100687
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:53175
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:53175 2023-05-15T14:00:49+02:00 Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone Allcock, A. Piertney, S. B. 2002-01-01 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/1/3962.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100687 en eng Springer https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/1/3962.pdf Allcock, A. and Piertney, S. B. (2002) Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone. Marine Biology, 140 (1). pp. 129-135. DOI 10.1007/s002270100687 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100687>. doi:10.1007/s002270100687 info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Article PeerReviewed 2002 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100687 2023-04-07T15:57:10Z The phylogenetic relationships of eight species of incirrate octopodid from western Antarctica were investigated using molecular sequence data from the mitochondrial 16s ribosomal RNA gene. The genus Pareledone, which is endemic to the Antarctic, was found to be polyphyletic. On the basis of this and previous morphological studies, it is suggested that species that are morphologically similar to Pareledone polymorpha should be removed from the genus. This simplifies the diagnosis of Pareledone: a new diagnosis is given. The subfamilies Eledoninae and Graneledoninae were also found to be polyphyletic. The applicability of using the presence of an ink sac as a taxonomic character to define the subfamilies is discussed. Loss of an ink sac is almost certainly an adaptation to depth and use of this character has produced an artificial classification with no evolutionary significance. As the other two subfamilies, Octopodinae and Bathypolypodinae, are also separated by this character, it is probable that all the subfamilies of the Octopodidae are polyphyletic. The use of subfamilies should therefore be discontinued until our understanding of the evolution of the family Octopodidae increases. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Southern Ocean OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Antarctic Southern Ocean The Antarctic Marine Biology 140 1 129 135
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description The phylogenetic relationships of eight species of incirrate octopodid from western Antarctica were investigated using molecular sequence data from the mitochondrial 16s ribosomal RNA gene. The genus Pareledone, which is endemic to the Antarctic, was found to be polyphyletic. On the basis of this and previous morphological studies, it is suggested that species that are morphologically similar to Pareledone polymorpha should be removed from the genus. This simplifies the diagnosis of Pareledone: a new diagnosis is given. The subfamilies Eledoninae and Graneledoninae were also found to be polyphyletic. The applicability of using the presence of an ink sac as a taxonomic character to define the subfamilies is discussed. Loss of an ink sac is almost certainly an adaptation to depth and use of this character has produced an artificial classification with no evolutionary significance. As the other two subfamilies, Octopodinae and Bathypolypodinae, are also separated by this character, it is probable that all the subfamilies of the Octopodidae are polyphyletic. The use of subfamilies should therefore be discontinued until our understanding of the evolution of the family Octopodidae increases.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Allcock, A.
Piertney, S. B.
spellingShingle Allcock, A.
Piertney, S. B.
Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone
author_facet Allcock, A.
Piertney, S. B.
author_sort Allcock, A.
title Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone
title_short Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone
title_full Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone
title_fullStr Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone
title_sort evolutionary relationships of southern ocean octopodidae (cephalopoda: octopoda) and a new diagnosis of pareledone
publisher Springer
publishDate 2002
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/1/3962.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100687
geographic Antarctic
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53175/1/3962.pdf
Allcock, A. and Piertney, S. B. (2002) Evolutionary relationships of Southern Ocean Octopodidae (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) and a new diagnosis of Pareledone. Marine Biology, 140 (1). pp. 129-135. DOI 10.1007/s002270100687 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100687>.
doi:10.1007/s002270100687
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100687
container_title Marine Biology
container_volume 140
container_issue 1
container_start_page 129
op_container_end_page 135
_version_ 1766270170135789568