Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data

Marine phytoplankton can regulate their stoichiometric composition in response to variations in the availability of nutrients, light and the pH of seawater. Varying elemental composition of photoautotrophs affects several important ecological and biogeochemical processes, e.g., primary and export pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Modelling
Main Authors: Krishna, Shubham, Pahlow, Markus, Schartau, Markus
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/1/Krishna.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:47411
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:47411 2023-05-15T17:51:46+02:00 Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data Krishna, Shubham Pahlow, Markus Schartau, Markus 2019-11-01 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/1/Krishna.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016 en eng Elsevier https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/1/Krishna.pdf Krishna, S., Pahlow, M. and Schartau, M. (2019) Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data. Ecological Modelling, 411 . Art.Nr. 108711. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016>. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016 info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Article PeerReviewed 2019 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016 2023-04-07T15:46:50Z Marine phytoplankton can regulate their stoichiometric composition in response to variations in the availability of nutrients, light and the pH of seawater. Varying elemental composition of photoautotrophs affects several important ecological and biogeochemical processes, e.g., primary and export production, nutrient cycling, calcification, and grazing. Here we compare two plankton ecosystem models that consider regulatory mechanisms of cellular carbon and nitrogen, driving the physiological acclimation of photoautotrophs. The Carbon:Nitrogen Regulated Ecosystem Model (CN-REcoM) and the optimality-based model (OBM) differ in their representation of phytoplankton dynamics, i.e. nutrient acquisition, synthesis of chlorophyll a, and growth. All other model compartments (zooplankton, detritus, dissolved inorganic and organic matter) and processes (grazing, aggregation, remineralisation) remain identical in both models. We assess the skills of the two models against data from an ocean acidification mesocosm experiment with three CO2 treatments. Neither model accounts for any carbon dioxide (CO2) effects explicitly. Instead, we assimilate data of the different CO2 treatments separately into the models. Thereby we aim at identifying optimal model parameter values that might correlate with differences in CO2 conditions. For the OBM, optimal parameter estimates of Qmin (subsistence N:C ratio) and V (maximum potential photosynthesis rate of photoautotrophs) turned out to be higher for mesocosms exposed to high CO2 compared to those with low CO2 concentrations. By contrast, a similar correlation is not observed for the CN-REcoM. A possible physiological interpretation of higher estimates of Qmin and V according to the OBM is that phytoplankton may experience environmental stress under more acidic conditions, and hence must invest more energy/resources for maintaining basic cellular functions. Our data assimilation reveals that the parameters of the OBM are better constrained by the data than those of the CN-REcoM. ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Ecological Modelling 411 108711
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description Marine phytoplankton can regulate their stoichiometric composition in response to variations in the availability of nutrients, light and the pH of seawater. Varying elemental composition of photoautotrophs affects several important ecological and biogeochemical processes, e.g., primary and export production, nutrient cycling, calcification, and grazing. Here we compare two plankton ecosystem models that consider regulatory mechanisms of cellular carbon and nitrogen, driving the physiological acclimation of photoautotrophs. The Carbon:Nitrogen Regulated Ecosystem Model (CN-REcoM) and the optimality-based model (OBM) differ in their representation of phytoplankton dynamics, i.e. nutrient acquisition, synthesis of chlorophyll a, and growth. All other model compartments (zooplankton, detritus, dissolved inorganic and organic matter) and processes (grazing, aggregation, remineralisation) remain identical in both models. We assess the skills of the two models against data from an ocean acidification mesocosm experiment with three CO2 treatments. Neither model accounts for any carbon dioxide (CO2) effects explicitly. Instead, we assimilate data of the different CO2 treatments separately into the models. Thereby we aim at identifying optimal model parameter values that might correlate with differences in CO2 conditions. For the OBM, optimal parameter estimates of Qmin (subsistence N:C ratio) and V (maximum potential photosynthesis rate of photoautotrophs) turned out to be higher for mesocosms exposed to high CO2 compared to those with low CO2 concentrations. By contrast, a similar correlation is not observed for the CN-REcoM. A possible physiological interpretation of higher estimates of Qmin and V according to the OBM is that phytoplankton may experience environmental stress under more acidic conditions, and hence must invest more energy/resources for maintaining basic cellular functions. Our data assimilation reveals that the parameters of the OBM are better constrained by the data than those of the CN-REcoM. ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Krishna, Shubham
Pahlow, Markus
Schartau, Markus
spellingShingle Krishna, Shubham
Pahlow, Markus
Schartau, Markus
Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data
author_facet Krishna, Shubham
Pahlow, Markus
Schartau, Markus
author_sort Krishna, Shubham
title Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data
title_short Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data
title_full Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data
title_fullStr Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data
title_sort comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2019
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/1/Krishna.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/47411/1/Krishna.pdf
Krishna, S., Pahlow, M. and Schartau, M. (2019) Comparison of two carbon-nitrogen regulatory models calibrated with mesocosm data. Ecological Modelling, 411 . Art.Nr. 108711. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016>.
doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.05.016
container_title Ecological Modelling
container_volume 411
container_start_page 108711
_version_ 1766159016654798848