Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate

The nature of the warm climates of the Cretaceous has been enigmatic since the first numerical climate models were run in the late 1970s. Quantitative simulations of the paleoclimate have consistently failed to agree with information from plant and animal fossils and climate sensitive sediments. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Earth Sciences
Main Authors: Hay, William W., DeConto, Robert M., de Boer, Poppe, Flögel, Sascha, Song, Ying, Stepashko, Andrei
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/7/Hay%20et.al.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:45062
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:45062 2023-05-15T15:13:35+02:00 Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate Hay, William W. DeConto, Robert M. de Boer, Poppe Flögel, Sascha Song, Ying Stepashko, Andrei 2019-03 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/7/Hay%20et.al.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2 en eng Springer https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/7/Hay%20et.al.pdf Hay, W. W., DeConto, R. M., de Boer, P., Flögel, S., Song, Y. and Stepashko, A. (2019) Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 108 . pp. 587-620. DOI 10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2>. doi:10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2 info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Article PeerReviewed 2019 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2 2023-04-07T15:42:42Z The nature of the warm climates of the Cretaceous has been enigmatic since the first numerical climate models were run in the late 1970s. Quantitative simulations of the paleoclimate have consistently failed to agree with information from plant and animal fossils and climate sensitive sediments. The ‘cold continental interior paradox’ (first described by DeConto et al. in Barrera E, Johnson C (eds) Evolution of the Cretaceous Ocean/climate system, vol 332. Geological Society of America Special Paper, Boulder, pp 391–406, 1999), has been an enigma, with extensive continental interiors, especially in northeast Asia, modeled as below freezing in spite of plant and other evidence to the contrary. We reconsider the paleoelevations of specific areas, particularly along the northeastern Siberian continental margin, where paleofloras indeed indicate higher temperatures than suggested by current climate models. Evidence for significant masses of ice on land during even the otherwise warmest times of the Cretaceous is solved by reinterpretation of the δ18O record of fossil plankton. The signal interpreted as an increase in ice volume on land is the same as the signal for an increase in the volume of groundwater reservoirs on land. The problem of a warm Arctic, where fossil floras indicate that they never experienced freezing conditions in winter, could not be solved by numerical simulations using higher CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas concentrations. We propose a solution by assuming that paleoelevations were less than today and that there were much more extensive wetlands (lakes, meandering rivers, swamps, bogs) on the continents than previously assumed. Using ~ 8 × CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas concentrations and assuming 50–75% water surfaces providing water vapor as a supplementary greenhouse gas on the continents reduces the meridional temperature gradients. Under these conditions the equatorial to polar region temperature gradients produce conditions compatible with fossil and sedimentological evidence. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Arctic International Journal of Earth Sciences 108 2 587 620
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description The nature of the warm climates of the Cretaceous has been enigmatic since the first numerical climate models were run in the late 1970s. Quantitative simulations of the paleoclimate have consistently failed to agree with information from plant and animal fossils and climate sensitive sediments. The ‘cold continental interior paradox’ (first described by DeConto et al. in Barrera E, Johnson C (eds) Evolution of the Cretaceous Ocean/climate system, vol 332. Geological Society of America Special Paper, Boulder, pp 391–406, 1999), has been an enigma, with extensive continental interiors, especially in northeast Asia, modeled as below freezing in spite of plant and other evidence to the contrary. We reconsider the paleoelevations of specific areas, particularly along the northeastern Siberian continental margin, where paleofloras indeed indicate higher temperatures than suggested by current climate models. Evidence for significant masses of ice on land during even the otherwise warmest times of the Cretaceous is solved by reinterpretation of the δ18O record of fossil plankton. The signal interpreted as an increase in ice volume on land is the same as the signal for an increase in the volume of groundwater reservoirs on land. The problem of a warm Arctic, where fossil floras indicate that they never experienced freezing conditions in winter, could not be solved by numerical simulations using higher CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas concentrations. We propose a solution by assuming that paleoelevations were less than today and that there were much more extensive wetlands (lakes, meandering rivers, swamps, bogs) on the continents than previously assumed. Using ~ 8 × CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas concentrations and assuming 50–75% water surfaces providing water vapor as a supplementary greenhouse gas on the continents reduces the meridional temperature gradients. Under these conditions the equatorial to polar region temperature gradients produce conditions compatible with fossil and sedimentological evidence.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hay, William W.
DeConto, Robert M.
de Boer, Poppe
Flögel, Sascha
Song, Ying
Stepashko, Andrei
spellingShingle Hay, William W.
DeConto, Robert M.
de Boer, Poppe
Flögel, Sascha
Song, Ying
Stepashko, Andrei
Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate
author_facet Hay, William W.
DeConto, Robert M.
de Boer, Poppe
Flögel, Sascha
Song, Ying
Stepashko, Andrei
author_sort Hay, William W.
title Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate
title_short Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate
title_full Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate
title_fullStr Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate
title_full_unstemmed Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate
title_sort possible solutions to several enigmas of cretaceous climate
publisher Springer
publishDate 2019
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/7/Hay%20et.al.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/45062/7/Hay%20et.al.pdf
Hay, W. W., DeConto, R. M., de Boer, P., Flögel, S., Song, Y. and Stepashko, A. (2019) Possible solutions to several enigmas of Cretaceous climate. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 108 . pp. 587-620. DOI 10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2>.
doi:10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1670-2
container_title International Journal of Earth Sciences
container_volume 108
container_issue 2
container_start_page 587
op_container_end_page 620
_version_ 1766344124280078336