Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation

The interplay of faulting and folding has long been recognized in extensional systems and numerous investigations have documented the importance of mechanical layering on development of normal-fault related monoclines. In this study we use discrete element modeling to explore the impact of mechanica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Structural Geology
Main Authors: Smart, Kevin J., Ferrill, David A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/1/Smart.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:44167
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:44167 2023-05-15T16:48:01+02:00 Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation Smart, Kevin J. Ferrill, David A. 2018 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/1/Smart.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009 en eng Elsevier https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/1/Smart.pdf Smart, K. J. and Ferrill, D. A. (2018) Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation. Journal of Structural Geology, 115 . pp. 82-90. DOI 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009>. doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009 info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Article PeerReviewed 2018 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009 2023-04-07T15:41:11Z The interplay of faulting and folding has long been recognized in extensional systems and numerous investigations have documented the importance of mechanical layering on development of normal-fault related monoclines. In this study we use discrete element modeling to explore the impact of mechanical layering and fault geometry on normal-fault related folding for a well-exposed field example in southwestern Iceland. The model honors the mechanically stratified character of the deformed sequence and replicates the monocline geometry by simulating displacement and upward propagation of a buried fault. A close match between model geometry and field observations was obtained using a refracted fault geometry and a cover sequence with alternating 40-m-thick relatively strong and 10-m-thick relatively weak layers. Initial deformation is accommodated by folding of mechanically weaker intervals and fracturing of mechanically stronger layers, and maximum monocline width is developed early. As overall fault displacement increases, throughgoing fracture connections along the footwall side of the monocline develop, leaving the monocline limb attached to the hanging wall. Consistent with field observations, model results suggest that significant near-surface and subsurface fracture porosity is developed in strong layers. Reproducing the complexity of the natural normal fault-related monocline in Iceland requires incorporating strongly contrasting mechanical properties within a layered cover sequence. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Journal of Structural Geology 115 82 90
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description The interplay of faulting and folding has long been recognized in extensional systems and numerous investigations have documented the importance of mechanical layering on development of normal-fault related monoclines. In this study we use discrete element modeling to explore the impact of mechanical layering and fault geometry on normal-fault related folding for a well-exposed field example in southwestern Iceland. The model honors the mechanically stratified character of the deformed sequence and replicates the monocline geometry by simulating displacement and upward propagation of a buried fault. A close match between model geometry and field observations was obtained using a refracted fault geometry and a cover sequence with alternating 40-m-thick relatively strong and 10-m-thick relatively weak layers. Initial deformation is accommodated by folding of mechanically weaker intervals and fracturing of mechanically stronger layers, and maximum monocline width is developed early. As overall fault displacement increases, throughgoing fracture connections along the footwall side of the monocline develop, leaving the monocline limb attached to the hanging wall. Consistent with field observations, model results suggest that significant near-surface and subsurface fracture porosity is developed in strong layers. Reproducing the complexity of the natural normal fault-related monocline in Iceland requires incorporating strongly contrasting mechanical properties within a layered cover sequence.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Smart, Kevin J.
Ferrill, David A.
spellingShingle Smart, Kevin J.
Ferrill, David A.
Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation
author_facet Smart, Kevin J.
Ferrill, David A.
author_sort Smart, Kevin J.
title Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation
title_short Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation
title_full Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation
title_fullStr Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation
title_full_unstemmed Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation
title_sort discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2018
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/1/Smart.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/44167/1/Smart.pdf
Smart, K. J. and Ferrill, D. A. (2018) Discrete element modeling of extensional fault-related monocline formation. Journal of Structural Geology, 115 . pp. 82-90. DOI 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009>.
doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.07.009
container_title Journal of Structural Geology
container_volume 115
container_start_page 82
op_container_end_page 90
_version_ 1766038114923446272