Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic

The impact of a subgrid-scale ice thickness distribution (ITD) and two standard ice strength formulations on simulated Arctic sea ice climate is investigated. To this end, different model configurations with and without an ITD were tuned by minimizing the weighted mean error between the simulated an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Main Authors: Ungermann, Mischa, Tremblay, L. Bruno, Martin, Torge, Losch, Martin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: AGU (American Geophysical Union) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/1/jgrc22169.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012128
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:37342
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:37342 2023-05-15T14:26:51+02:00 Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic Ungermann, Mischa Tremblay, L. Bruno Martin, Torge Losch, Martin 2017-03-16 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/1/jgrc22169.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012128 en eng AGU (American Geophysical Union) Wiley https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/1/jgrc22169.pdf Ungermann, M., Tremblay, L. B., Martin, T. and Losch, M. (2017) Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic. Open Access Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122 (3). pp. 2090-2107. DOI 10.1002/2016JC012128 <https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012128>. doi:10.1002/2016JC012128 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Article PeerReviewed 2017 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012128 2023-04-07T15:32:19Z The impact of a subgrid-scale ice thickness distribution (ITD) and two standard ice strength formulations on simulated Arctic sea ice climate is investigated. To this end, different model configurations with and without an ITD were tuned by minimizing the weighted mean error between the simulated and observed sea ice concentration, thickness, and drift speed with an semiautomatic parameter optimization routine. The standard ITD and ice strength parameterization lead to larger errors when compared to the simple single-category model with an ice strength parameterization based on the mean ice thickness. Interestingly, the simpler ice strength formulation, which depends linearly on the mean ice thickness, also reduces the model-observation error when using an ITD. For the ice strength parameterization that makes use of the ITD, the effective ice strength depends strongly on the number of thickness categories, so that introducing more categories can lead to overall thicker ice that is more easily deformed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Sea ice OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Arctic Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 122 3 2090 2107
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description The impact of a subgrid-scale ice thickness distribution (ITD) and two standard ice strength formulations on simulated Arctic sea ice climate is investigated. To this end, different model configurations with and without an ITD were tuned by minimizing the weighted mean error between the simulated and observed sea ice concentration, thickness, and drift speed with an semiautomatic parameter optimization routine. The standard ITD and ice strength parameterization lead to larger errors when compared to the simple single-category model with an ice strength parameterization based on the mean ice thickness. Interestingly, the simpler ice strength formulation, which depends linearly on the mean ice thickness, also reduces the model-observation error when using an ITD. For the ice strength parameterization that makes use of the ITD, the effective ice strength depends strongly on the number of thickness categories, so that introducing more categories can lead to overall thicker ice that is more easily deformed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ungermann, Mischa
Tremblay, L. Bruno
Martin, Torge
Losch, Martin
spellingShingle Ungermann, Mischa
Tremblay, L. Bruno
Martin, Torge
Losch, Martin
Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic
author_facet Ungermann, Mischa
Tremblay, L. Bruno
Martin, Torge
Losch, Martin
author_sort Ungermann, Mischa
title Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic
title_short Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic
title_full Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic
title_fullStr Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic
title_sort impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the arctic
publisher AGU (American Geophysical Union)
publishDate 2017
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/1/jgrc22169.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012128
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Sea ice
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/37342/1/jgrc22169.pdf
Ungermann, M., Tremblay, L. B., Martin, T. and Losch, M. (2017) Impact of the ice strength formulation on the performance of a sea ice thickness distribution model in the Arctic. Open Access Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122 (3). pp. 2090-2107. DOI 10.1002/2016JC012128 <https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012128>.
doi:10.1002/2016JC012128
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012128
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
container_volume 122
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2090
op_container_end_page 2107
_version_ 1766300293376507904