Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2

The recovery of natural gas from CH4-hydrate deposits in sub-marine and sub-permafrost environments through injection of CO2 is considered a suitable strategy towards emission-neutral energy production. This study shows that the injection of hot, supercritical CO2 is particularly promising. The addi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies
Main Authors: Deusner, Christian, Bigalke, Nikolaus, Kossel, Elke, Haeckel, Matthias
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/1/2012_Deusner_etal_energies-05-02112.pdf
https://doi.org/10.3390/en5072112
id ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:19399
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceanrep:oai:oceanrep.geomar.de:19399 2023-05-15T17:12:07+02:00 Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2 Deusner, Christian Bigalke, Nikolaus Kossel, Elke Haeckel, Matthias 2012 text https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/ https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/1/2012_Deusner_etal_energies-05-02112.pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/en5072112 en eng MDPI https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/1/2012_Deusner_etal_energies-05-02112.pdf Deusner, C. , Bigalke, N., Kossel, E. and Haeckel, M. (2012) Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2. Open Access Energies, 5 (7). pp. 2112-2140. DOI 10.3390/en5072112 <https://doi.org/10.3390/en5072112>. doi:10.3390/en5072112 cc_by_3.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Article PeerReviewed 2012 ftoceanrep https://doi.org/10.3390/en5072112 2023-04-07T15:06:24Z The recovery of natural gas from CH4-hydrate deposits in sub-marine and sub-permafrost environments through injection of CO2 is considered a suitable strategy towards emission-neutral energy production. This study shows that the injection of hot, supercritical CO2 is particularly promising. The addition of heat triggers the dissociation of CH4-hydrate while the CO2, once thermally equilibrated, reacts with the pore water and is retained in the reservoir as immobile CO2-hydrate. Furthermore, optimal reservoir conditions of pressure and temperature are constrained. Experiments were conducted in a high-pressure flow-through reactor at different sediment temperatures (2 °C, 8 °C, 10 °C) and hydrostatic pressures (8 MPa, 13 MPa). The efficiency of both, CH4 production and CO2 retention is best at 8 °C, 13 MPa. Here, both CO2- and CH4-hydrate as well as mixed hydrates can form. At 2 °C, the production process was less effective due to congestion of transport pathways through the sediment by rapidly forming CO2-hydrate. In contrast, at 10 °C CH4 production suffered from local increases in permeability and fast breakthrough of the injection fluid, thereby confining the accessibility to the CH4 pool to only the most prominent fluid channels. Mass and volume balancing of the collected gas and fluid stream identified gas mobilization as equally important process parameter in addition to the rates of methane hydrate dissociation and hydrate conversion. Thus, the combination of heat supply and CO2 injection in one supercritical phase helps to overcome the mass transfer limitations usually observed in experiments with cold liquid or gaseous CO2. Article in Journal/Newspaper Methane hydrate permafrost OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel) Energies 5 7 2112 2140
institution Open Polar
collection OceanRep (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre für Ocean Research Kiel)
op_collection_id ftoceanrep
language English
description The recovery of natural gas from CH4-hydrate deposits in sub-marine and sub-permafrost environments through injection of CO2 is considered a suitable strategy towards emission-neutral energy production. This study shows that the injection of hot, supercritical CO2 is particularly promising. The addition of heat triggers the dissociation of CH4-hydrate while the CO2, once thermally equilibrated, reacts with the pore water and is retained in the reservoir as immobile CO2-hydrate. Furthermore, optimal reservoir conditions of pressure and temperature are constrained. Experiments were conducted in a high-pressure flow-through reactor at different sediment temperatures (2 °C, 8 °C, 10 °C) and hydrostatic pressures (8 MPa, 13 MPa). The efficiency of both, CH4 production and CO2 retention is best at 8 °C, 13 MPa. Here, both CO2- and CH4-hydrate as well as mixed hydrates can form. At 2 °C, the production process was less effective due to congestion of transport pathways through the sediment by rapidly forming CO2-hydrate. In contrast, at 10 °C CH4 production suffered from local increases in permeability and fast breakthrough of the injection fluid, thereby confining the accessibility to the CH4 pool to only the most prominent fluid channels. Mass and volume balancing of the collected gas and fluid stream identified gas mobilization as equally important process parameter in addition to the rates of methane hydrate dissociation and hydrate conversion. Thus, the combination of heat supply and CO2 injection in one supercritical phase helps to overcome the mass transfer limitations usually observed in experiments with cold liquid or gaseous CO2.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Deusner, Christian
Bigalke, Nikolaus
Kossel, Elke
Haeckel, Matthias
spellingShingle Deusner, Christian
Bigalke, Nikolaus
Kossel, Elke
Haeckel, Matthias
Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2
author_facet Deusner, Christian
Bigalke, Nikolaus
Kossel, Elke
Haeckel, Matthias
author_sort Deusner, Christian
title Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2
title_short Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2
title_full Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2
title_fullStr Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2
title_full_unstemmed Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2
title_sort methane production from gas hydrate deposits through injection of supercritical co2
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2012
url https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/
https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/1/2012_Deusner_etal_energies-05-02112.pdf
https://doi.org/10.3390/en5072112
genre Methane hydrate
permafrost
genre_facet Methane hydrate
permafrost
op_relation https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/19399/1/2012_Deusner_etal_energies-05-02112.pdf
Deusner, C. , Bigalke, N., Kossel, E. and Haeckel, M. (2012) Methane Production from Gas Hydrate Deposits through Injection of Supercritical CO2. Open Access Energies, 5 (7). pp. 2112-2140. DOI 10.3390/en5072112 <https://doi.org/10.3390/en5072112>.
doi:10.3390/en5072112
op_rights cc_by_3.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/en5072112
container_title Energies
container_volume 5
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2112
op_container_end_page 2140
_version_ 1766068885464809472