Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water

Utilization of infertile coastal lands in the north Iran and Caspian Sea brackish water for reproduction and rearing of Beluga was the main objective of this study. To do so, 600 Huso huso fingerlings with an average weight of 4829 grams were reared in fiberglass tanks (1.9*1.9*0.53m), amounting to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pourali Fashtami, H.R., Mohseni, M., Alizadeh, M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Persian
Published: 2006
Subjects:
FCR
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1834/39113
id ftoceandocs:oai:aquadocs.org:1834/39113
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceandocs:oai:aquadocs.org:1834/39113 2023-05-15T15:41:44+02:00 Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water Pourali Fashtami, H.R. Mohseni, M. Alizadeh, M. 2006 application/pdf 43-50 http://hdl.handle.net/1834/39113 fa per http://www.ifro.ir 1026-1354 http://hdl.handle.net/1834/39113 http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/24694 18721 2018-08-04 15:56:38 24694 Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute Aquaculture Huso huso FCR Growth rate Caspian Sea Sefidrood River Iran article TRUE 2006 ftoceandocs 2023-04-06T17:06:21Z Utilization of infertile coastal lands in the north Iran and Caspian Sea brackish water for reproduction and rearing of Beluga was the main objective of this study. To do so, 600 Huso huso fingerlings with an average weight of 4829 grams were reared in fiberglass tanks (1.9*1.9*0.53m), amounting to 25 fish per square meter. We used a random statistical design in two trials under similar conditions (feeding rate, stocking density etc.) over a rearing period of 80 days. Brackish water was transferred from the Caspian Sea and used in four tanks (Group I) and freshwater from the Sefidrood River was used in the remaining two tanks. Four replicates were used for experimental tanks and two were used for control tanks. Water flow in both groups was maintained at 0.2 to 0.5 liters per second. Results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. Mean water temperatures for brackish and freshwater treatments were 22.4±3.7 and 23.1±3/9 degrees centigrade respectively. Results of ANOVA on biometrical measurements during 71 rearing days indicated a significant difference in food conversion ratio (FCR) for the two treatments at 95% confidence level. After 71 days of rearing, FCR in Group 1 was 1.190.44, more suitable as compared to that in Group 2 (1.39±0.043). Fishes in Group 1 reached an average weight of 196.88 and those in Group 2 reached an average weight of 193.1g, indicating no significant difference in the final body weight of fishes in the two groups. Our observation showed better results for culture of Beluga in brackish water as compared to freshwater. Article in Journal/Newspaper Beluga Beluga* IODE-UNESCO: OceanDocs - E-Repository of Ocean Publications
institution Open Polar
collection IODE-UNESCO: OceanDocs - E-Repository of Ocean Publications
op_collection_id ftoceandocs
language Persian
topic Aquaculture
Huso huso
FCR
Growth rate
Caspian Sea
Sefidrood River
Iran
spellingShingle Aquaculture
Huso huso
FCR
Growth rate
Caspian Sea
Sefidrood River
Iran
Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
Mohseni, M.
Alizadeh, M.
Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
topic_facet Aquaculture
Huso huso
FCR
Growth rate
Caspian Sea
Sefidrood River
Iran
description Utilization of infertile coastal lands in the north Iran and Caspian Sea brackish water for reproduction and rearing of Beluga was the main objective of this study. To do so, 600 Huso huso fingerlings with an average weight of 4829 grams were reared in fiberglass tanks (1.9*1.9*0.53m), amounting to 25 fish per square meter. We used a random statistical design in two trials under similar conditions (feeding rate, stocking density etc.) over a rearing period of 80 days. Brackish water was transferred from the Caspian Sea and used in four tanks (Group I) and freshwater from the Sefidrood River was used in the remaining two tanks. Four replicates were used for experimental tanks and two were used for control tanks. Water flow in both groups was maintained at 0.2 to 0.5 liters per second. Results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. Mean water temperatures for brackish and freshwater treatments were 22.4±3.7 and 23.1±3/9 degrees centigrade respectively. Results of ANOVA on biometrical measurements during 71 rearing days indicated a significant difference in food conversion ratio (FCR) for the two treatments at 95% confidence level. After 71 days of rearing, FCR in Group 1 was 1.190.44, more suitable as compared to that in Group 2 (1.39±0.043). Fishes in Group 1 reached an average weight of 196.88 and those in Group 2 reached an average weight of 193.1g, indicating no significant difference in the final body weight of fishes in the two groups. Our observation showed better results for culture of Beluga in brackish water as compared to freshwater.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
Mohseni, M.
Alizadeh, M.
author_facet Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
Mohseni, M.
Alizadeh, M.
author_sort Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
title Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_short Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_full Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_fullStr Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_sort comparison of beluga (huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
publishDate 2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/1834/39113
genre Beluga
Beluga*
genre_facet Beluga
Beluga*
op_source http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/24694
18721
2018-08-04 15:56:38
24694
Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute
op_relation http://www.ifro.ir
1026-1354
http://hdl.handle.net/1834/39113
_version_ 1766374624978796544