Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish

Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV’s) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We compared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Fisheries Review
Main Authors: Eiler, John H., Grothues, Thomas M., Dobarro, Joseph A., Masuda, Michele M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30417
https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.75.4.2
id ftoceandocs:oai:aquadocs.org:1834/30417
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceandocs:oai:aquadocs.org:1834/30417 2023-05-15T17:54:37+02:00 Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish Eiler, John H. Grothues, Thomas M. Dobarro, Joseph A. Masuda, Michele M. 2013 application/pdf 27-42 http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30417 https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.75.4.2 en eng http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/mfr754/mfr7542.pdf 0090-1830 doi:10.7755/MFR.75.4.2 http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30417 john.eiler@noaa.gov http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/14555 403 2014-02-26 00:13:38 14555 United States National Marine Fisheries Service Ecology Fisheries Management article 2013 ftoceandocs https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.75.4.2 2023-04-06T17:04:08Z Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV’s) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We compared surface vessel and AUV tracking capabilities under rigorous conditions in coastal waters near Juneau, Alaska. Tracking surveys were conducted with a REMUS 100 AUV equipped with an integrated acoustic receiver and hydrophone. The AUV was programmed to navigate along predetermined routes to detect both reference transmitters at 20–500 m depths and tagged fish and crabs in situ. Comparable boat surveys were also conducted. Transmitter depth had a major impact on tracking performance. The AUV was equally effective or better than the boat at detecting reference transmitters in shallow water, and significantly better for transmitters at deeper depths. Similar results were observed for tagged animals. Red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus, at moderate depths were recorded by both tracking methods, while only the AUV detected Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, at depths exceeding 500 m. Strong currents and deep depths caused problems with AUV navigation, position estimation, and operational performance, but reflect problems encountered by other AUV applications that will likely diminish with future advances, enhanced methods, and increased use. Article in Journal/Newspaper Paralithodes camtschaticus Red king crab Alaska IODE-UNESCO: OceanDocs - E-Repository of Ocean Publications Marine Fisheries Review 75 4 27 42
institution Open Polar
collection IODE-UNESCO: OceanDocs - E-Repository of Ocean Publications
op_collection_id ftoceandocs
language English
topic Ecology
Fisheries
Management
spellingShingle Ecology
Fisheries
Management
Eiler, John H.
Grothues, Thomas M.
Dobarro, Joseph A.
Masuda, Michele M.
Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish
topic_facet Ecology
Fisheries
Management
description Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV’s) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We compared surface vessel and AUV tracking capabilities under rigorous conditions in coastal waters near Juneau, Alaska. Tracking surveys were conducted with a REMUS 100 AUV equipped with an integrated acoustic receiver and hydrophone. The AUV was programmed to navigate along predetermined routes to detect both reference transmitters at 20–500 m depths and tagged fish and crabs in situ. Comparable boat surveys were also conducted. Transmitter depth had a major impact on tracking performance. The AUV was equally effective or better than the boat at detecting reference transmitters in shallow water, and significantly better for transmitters at deeper depths. Similar results were observed for tagged animals. Red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus, at moderate depths were recorded by both tracking methods, while only the AUV detected Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, at depths exceeding 500 m. Strong currents and deep depths caused problems with AUV navigation, position estimation, and operational performance, but reflect problems encountered by other AUV applications that will likely diminish with future advances, enhanced methods, and increased use.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Eiler, John H.
Grothues, Thomas M.
Dobarro, Joseph A.
Masuda, Michele M.
author_facet Eiler, John H.
Grothues, Thomas M.
Dobarro, Joseph A.
Masuda, Michele M.
author_sort Eiler, John H.
title Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish
title_short Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish
title_full Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish
title_fullStr Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish
title_full_unstemmed Comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish
title_sort comparing autonomous underwater vehicle (auv) and vessel-based tracking performance for locating acoustically tagged fish
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30417
https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.75.4.2
genre Paralithodes camtschaticus
Red king crab
Alaska
genre_facet Paralithodes camtschaticus
Red king crab
Alaska
op_source john.eiler@noaa.gov
http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/14555
403
2014-02-26 00:13:38
14555
United States National Marine Fisheries Service
op_relation http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/mfr754/mfr7542.pdf
0090-1830
doi:10.7755/MFR.75.4.2
http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30417
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7755/MFR.75.4.2
container_title Marine Fisheries Review
container_volume 75
container_issue 4
container_start_page 27
op_container_end_page 42
_version_ 1766162417399627776