Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water

Utilization of infertile coastal lands in the north Iran and Caspian Sea brackish water for reproduction and rearing of Beluga was the main objective of this study. To do so, 600 Huso huso fingerlings with an average weight of 48.29 grams were reared in fiberglass tanks (1.9*1.9*0.53m), amounting to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pourali Fashtami, H.R., Mohseni, M., Alizadeh, M.
Format: Book
Language:Persian
Published: 2006
Subjects:
FCR
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1834/12842
id ftoceandocs:oai:aquadocs.org:1834/12842
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoceandocs:oai:aquadocs.org:1834/12842 2023-05-15T15:41:41+02:00 Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water Pourali Fashtami, H.R. Mohseni, M. Alizadeh, M. Iran Caspian Sea Sefidroud River 2006 pp.43-50 http://hdl.handle.net/1834/12842 fa per http://isfj.areo.ir/ 1026-1354 http://hdl.handle.net/1834/12842 Beluga Huso huso FCR Growth Rate Weight Temperature Density ANOVA Brackish water Fresh water Journal Contribution Refereed 2006 ftoceandocs 2023-04-06T16:59:47Z Utilization of infertile coastal lands in the north Iran and Caspian Sea brackish water for reproduction and rearing of Beluga was the main objective of this study. To do so, 600 Huso huso fingerlings with an average weight of 48.29 grams were reared in fiberglass tanks (1.9*1.9*0.53m), amounting to 25 fish per square meter. We used a random statistical design in two trials under similar conditions (feeding rate, stocking density etc.) over a rearing period of 80 days. Brackish water was transferred from the Caspian Sea and used in four tanks (Group 1) and freshwater from the Sefidroud River was used in the remaining two tanks. Four replicates were used for experimental tanks and two were used for control tanks. Water flow in both groups was maintained at 0.2 to 0.5 liters per second. Results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. Mean water temperatures for brackish and freshwater treatments were 22.4±3.7 and 23.1±3.9 degrees centigrade respectively. Results of ANOVA on biometrical measurements during 71 rearing days indicated a significant difference in food conversion ratio (FCR) for the two treatments at 95% confidence level. After 71 days of rearing, FCR in Group I was 1.19±0.04, more suitable as compared to that in Group 2 (1.39±0.043). Fishes in Group 1 reached an average weight of 196.8g and those in Group 2 reached an average weight of 193.1g, indicating no significant difference in the final body weight of fishes in the two groups. Our observation showed better results for culture of Beluga in brackish water as compared to freshwater. Published Book Beluga Beluga* IODE-UNESCO: OceanDocs - E-Repository of Ocean Publications
institution Open Polar
collection IODE-UNESCO: OceanDocs - E-Repository of Ocean Publications
op_collection_id ftoceandocs
language Persian
topic Beluga
Huso huso
FCR
Growth Rate
Weight
Temperature
Density
ANOVA
Brackish water
Fresh water
spellingShingle Beluga
Huso huso
FCR
Growth Rate
Weight
Temperature
Density
ANOVA
Brackish water
Fresh water
Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
Mohseni, M.
Alizadeh, M.
Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
topic_facet Beluga
Huso huso
FCR
Growth Rate
Weight
Temperature
Density
ANOVA
Brackish water
Fresh water
description Utilization of infertile coastal lands in the north Iran and Caspian Sea brackish water for reproduction and rearing of Beluga was the main objective of this study. To do so, 600 Huso huso fingerlings with an average weight of 48.29 grams were reared in fiberglass tanks (1.9*1.9*0.53m), amounting to 25 fish per square meter. We used a random statistical design in two trials under similar conditions (feeding rate, stocking density etc.) over a rearing period of 80 days. Brackish water was transferred from the Caspian Sea and used in four tanks (Group 1) and freshwater from the Sefidroud River was used in the remaining two tanks. Four replicates were used for experimental tanks and two were used for control tanks. Water flow in both groups was maintained at 0.2 to 0.5 liters per second. Results were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. Mean water temperatures for brackish and freshwater treatments were 22.4±3.7 and 23.1±3.9 degrees centigrade respectively. Results of ANOVA on biometrical measurements during 71 rearing days indicated a significant difference in food conversion ratio (FCR) for the two treatments at 95% confidence level. After 71 days of rearing, FCR in Group I was 1.19±0.04, more suitable as compared to that in Group 2 (1.39±0.043). Fishes in Group 1 reached an average weight of 196.8g and those in Group 2 reached an average weight of 193.1g, indicating no significant difference in the final body weight of fishes in the two groups. Our observation showed better results for culture of Beluga in brackish water as compared to freshwater. Published
format Book
author Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
Mohseni, M.
Alizadeh, M.
author_facet Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
Mohseni, M.
Alizadeh, M.
author_sort Pourali Fashtami, H.R.
title Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_short Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_full Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_fullStr Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Beluga (Huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
title_sort comparison of beluga (huso huso) growth rate in brackish and fresh-water
publishDate 2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/1834/12842
op_coverage Iran
Caspian Sea
Sefidroud River
genre Beluga
Beluga*
genre_facet Beluga
Beluga*
op_relation http://isfj.areo.ir/
1026-1354
http://hdl.handle.net/1834/12842
_version_ 1766374579239911424