Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons

The Global Commons – the High Seas, Antarctica, the Atmosphere, and Outer Space – are resource domains outside the authority of states. Historically, the Global Commons have been practically inaccessible and thus rarely subject to sovereignty claims and international regulations. With technological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Relations
Main Authors: Riddervold, Marianne, Newsome, Akasemi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3008755
https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211036598
id ftnupi:oai:nupi.brage.unit.no:11250/3008755
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnupi:oai:nupi.brage.unit.no:11250/3008755 2023-05-15T13:32:55+02:00 Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons Riddervold, Marianne Newsome, Akasemi 2022-07-27T07:28:30Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3008755 https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211036598 eng eng International Relations. 2021, 1-19. urn:issn:0047-1178 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3008755 https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211036598 cristin:1924654 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no CC-BY 1-19 International Relations Peer reviewed Journal article 2022 ftnupi https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211036598 2022-10-13T05:49:44Z The Global Commons – the High Seas, Antarctica, the Atmosphere, and Outer Space – are resource domains outside the authority of states. Historically, the Global Commons have been practically inaccessible and thus rarely subject to sovereignty claims and international regulations. With technological advances and environmental developments, the Global Commons have become a key site for international relations (hereinafter IR). In spite of often competing claims from state and non-state actors to these areas, the Global Commons have remained mainly cooperative. This is not what one would expect from most IR perspectives in a close to anarchical environment and a volatile geopolitical international environment. This Special Issue sets out to address this puzzle by asking: To what extent and why is there little conflict in the Global Commons? For this purpose, this introduction develops a common framework that distinguishes between three models and corresponding hypotheses of the factors affecting the level of cooperation and conflict in these domains. While two are based on realist and liberal IR perspectives, we draw on constructivism, political theory, and law to develop a third model, called the Human Heritage model. To conclude, this introduction also sums up the findings and discusses their implications for the Global Commons and IR studies. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Norwegian Institute of international affairs: NUPI Research Online (Brage) International Relations 35 3 365 383
institution Open Polar
collection Norwegian Institute of international affairs: NUPI Research Online (Brage)
op_collection_id ftnupi
language English
description The Global Commons – the High Seas, Antarctica, the Atmosphere, and Outer Space – are resource domains outside the authority of states. Historically, the Global Commons have been practically inaccessible and thus rarely subject to sovereignty claims and international regulations. With technological advances and environmental developments, the Global Commons have become a key site for international relations (hereinafter IR). In spite of often competing claims from state and non-state actors to these areas, the Global Commons have remained mainly cooperative. This is not what one would expect from most IR perspectives in a close to anarchical environment and a volatile geopolitical international environment. This Special Issue sets out to address this puzzle by asking: To what extent and why is there little conflict in the Global Commons? For this purpose, this introduction develops a common framework that distinguishes between three models and corresponding hypotheses of the factors affecting the level of cooperation and conflict in these domains. While two are based on realist and liberal IR perspectives, we draw on constructivism, political theory, and law to develop a third model, called the Human Heritage model. To conclude, this introduction also sums up the findings and discusses their implications for the Global Commons and IR studies. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Riddervold, Marianne
Newsome, Akasemi
spellingShingle Riddervold, Marianne
Newsome, Akasemi
Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons
author_facet Riddervold, Marianne
Newsome, Akasemi
author_sort Riddervold, Marianne
title Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons
title_short Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons
title_full Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons
title_fullStr Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons
title_full_unstemmed Introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons
title_sort introduction: cooperation, conflict, and interaction in the global commons
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3008755
https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211036598
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source 1-19
International Relations
op_relation International Relations. 2021, 1-19.
urn:issn:0047-1178
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3008755
https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211036598
cristin:1924654
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211036598
container_title International Relations
container_volume 35
container_issue 3
container_start_page 365
op_container_end_page 383
_version_ 1766036969061613568