Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda

After a period of relative neglect in the 1990s and early 2000s, the Arctic is back on the agenda of the Russian authorities. To ensure efficient coordination and implementation of its Arctic strategy, the government in 2015 established a State Commission for Arctic Development. It was to serve as a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics
Main Author: Blakkisrud, Helge
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2647809
https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1929
id ftnupi:oai:nupi.brage.unit.no:11250/2647809
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnupi:oai:nupi.brage.unit.no:11250/2647809 2023-05-15T14:21:29+02:00 Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda Blakkisrud, Helge 2020-03-20T11:27:35Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2647809 https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1929 eng eng Norges forskningsråd: 257638/H30 Arctic Review on Law and Politics. 2019, 10 190-216. urn:issn:1891-6252 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2647809 https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1929 cristin:1787198 Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no CC-BY-NC 190-216 10 Arctic Review on Law and Politics Peer reviewed Journal article 2020 ftnupi https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1929 2022-10-13T05:49:44Z After a period of relative neglect in the 1990s and early 2000s, the Arctic is back on the agenda of the Russian authorities. To ensure efficient coordination and implementation of its Arctic strategy, the government in 2015 established a State Commission for Arctic Development. It was to serve as a platform for coordinating the implementation of the government’s ambitious plans for the Arctic, for exchange of information among Arctic actors, and for ironing out interagency and interregional conflicts. Based on a case study of the State Commission for Arctic Development, this article has a twofold goal. First, it explores the current Russian domestic Arctic agenda, mapping key actors and priorities and examining the results achieved so far. Second, it discusses what this case study may tell us the about policy formulation and implementation in Russia today. We find that while the government’s renewed focus on the Arctic Zone has yielded some impressive results, the State Commission has been at best a mixed success. The case study demonstrates how, in the context of authoritarian modernization, the Russian government struggles to come up with effective and efficient institutions for Arctic governance. Moreover, the widespread image of a Russian governance model based on a strictly hierarchic “power vertical” must be modified. Russia’s Arctic policy agenda is characterized by infighting and bureaucratic obstructionism: even when Putin intervenes personally, achieving the desired goals can prove difficult. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Arctic review on law and politics Norwegian Institute of international affairs: NUPI Research Online (Brage) Arctic Arctic Review on Law and Politics 10 0 190
institution Open Polar
collection Norwegian Institute of international affairs: NUPI Research Online (Brage)
op_collection_id ftnupi
language English
description After a period of relative neglect in the 1990s and early 2000s, the Arctic is back on the agenda of the Russian authorities. To ensure efficient coordination and implementation of its Arctic strategy, the government in 2015 established a State Commission for Arctic Development. It was to serve as a platform for coordinating the implementation of the government’s ambitious plans for the Arctic, for exchange of information among Arctic actors, and for ironing out interagency and interregional conflicts. Based on a case study of the State Commission for Arctic Development, this article has a twofold goal. First, it explores the current Russian domestic Arctic agenda, mapping key actors and priorities and examining the results achieved so far. Second, it discusses what this case study may tell us the about policy formulation and implementation in Russia today. We find that while the government’s renewed focus on the Arctic Zone has yielded some impressive results, the State Commission has been at best a mixed success. The case study demonstrates how, in the context of authoritarian modernization, the Russian government struggles to come up with effective and efficient institutions for Arctic governance. Moreover, the widespread image of a Russian governance model based on a strictly hierarchic “power vertical” must be modified. Russia’s Arctic policy agenda is characterized by infighting and bureaucratic obstructionism: even when Putin intervenes personally, achieving the desired goals can prove difficult. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Blakkisrud, Helge
spellingShingle Blakkisrud, Helge
Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda
author_facet Blakkisrud, Helge
author_sort Blakkisrud, Helge
title Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda
title_short Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda
title_full Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda
title_fullStr Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda
title_full_unstemmed Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda
title_sort governing the arctic: the russian state commission for arctic development and the forging of a new domestic arctic policy agenda
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2647809
https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1929
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Arctic review on law and politics
op_source 190-216
10
Arctic Review on Law and Politics
op_relation Norges forskningsråd: 257638/H30
Arctic Review on Law and Politics. 2019, 10 190-216.
urn:issn:1891-6252
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2647809
https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1929
cristin:1787198
op_rights Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC
op_doi https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v10.1929
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 10
container_issue 0
container_start_page 190
_version_ 1766294211017048064