Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research.

The development of evidence-based international strategies for the conservation and management of Arctic ecosystems in the face of climate change is hindered by critical knowledge gaps in Arctic floristic diversity and evolution. Particularly poorly studied are the bryophytes, which dominate the veg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Science
Main Authors: Lewis, Lily R., Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M., Biersma, Elisabeth M., Convey, Peter, Goffinet, Bernard, Hassel, Kristian, Kruijer, Hans J.D., La Farge, Catherine, Metzgar, Jordan, Stech, Michael, Villarreal, Juan Carlos, McDaniel, Stuart F.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: NRC Research Press (Canadian Science Publishing) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481069
https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
id ftntnutrondheimi:oai:ntnuopen.ntnu.no:11250/2481069
record_format openpolar
spelling ftntnutrondheimi:oai:ntnuopen.ntnu.no:11250/2481069 2023-05-15T14:20:28+02:00 Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research. Lewis, Lily R. Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M. Biersma, Elisabeth M. Convey, Peter Goffinet, Bernard Hassel, Kristian Kruijer, Hans J.D. La Farge, Catherine Metzgar, Jordan Stech, Michael Villarreal, Juan Carlos McDaniel, Stuart F. 2017 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481069 https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043 eng eng NRC Research Press (Canadian Science Publishing) Arctic Science. 2017, 3 (3), 475-497. urn:issn:2368-7460 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481069 https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043 cristin:1539908 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no CC-BY 475-497 3 Arctic Science Journal article Peer reviewed 2017 ftntnutrondheimi https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043 2019-09-17T06:53:30Z The development of evidence-based international strategies for the conservation and management of Arctic ecosystems in the face of climate change is hindered by critical knowledge gaps in Arctic floristic diversity and evolution. Particularly poorly studied are the bryophytes, which dominate the vegetation across vast areas of the Arctic and consequently play an important role in global biogeochemical cycles. Currently, much of what is known about Arctic floristic evolution is based on studies of vascular plants. Bryophytes, however, possess a number of features, such as poikilohydry, totipotency, several reproductive strategies, and the ability to disperse through microscopic diaspores, that may cause their responses to Arctic environments to differ from those of the vascular plants. Here we discuss several priority areas identified in the Arctic Council’s “Arctic Biodiversity Assessment” that are necessary to illuminate patterns of Arctic bryophyte evolution and diversity, including dispersal, glacial refugia, local adaptation, and ecological interactions with bryophyte-associated microbiomes. A survey of digitally available herbarium data archived in the largest online aggregate, GBIF, across the Arctic to boreal zones indicates that sampling coverage of mosses is heterogeneous and relatively sparse in the Arctic sensu stricto. A coordinated international effort across the Arctic will be necessary to address knowledge gaps in Arctic bryophyte diversity and evolution in the context of ongoing climate change. publishedVersion This article is open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic biodiversity Arctic Climate change NTNU Open Archive (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) Arctic Arctic Science 3 3 475 497
institution Open Polar
collection NTNU Open Archive (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
op_collection_id ftntnutrondheimi
language English
description The development of evidence-based international strategies for the conservation and management of Arctic ecosystems in the face of climate change is hindered by critical knowledge gaps in Arctic floristic diversity and evolution. Particularly poorly studied are the bryophytes, which dominate the vegetation across vast areas of the Arctic and consequently play an important role in global biogeochemical cycles. Currently, much of what is known about Arctic floristic evolution is based on studies of vascular plants. Bryophytes, however, possess a number of features, such as poikilohydry, totipotency, several reproductive strategies, and the ability to disperse through microscopic diaspores, that may cause their responses to Arctic environments to differ from those of the vascular plants. Here we discuss several priority areas identified in the Arctic Council’s “Arctic Biodiversity Assessment” that are necessary to illuminate patterns of Arctic bryophyte evolution and diversity, including dispersal, glacial refugia, local adaptation, and ecological interactions with bryophyte-associated microbiomes. A survey of digitally available herbarium data archived in the largest online aggregate, GBIF, across the Arctic to boreal zones indicates that sampling coverage of mosses is heterogeneous and relatively sparse in the Arctic sensu stricto. A coordinated international effort across the Arctic will be necessary to address knowledge gaps in Arctic bryophyte diversity and evolution in the context of ongoing climate change. publishedVersion This article is open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lewis, Lily R.
Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M.
Biersma, Elisabeth M.
Convey, Peter
Goffinet, Bernard
Hassel, Kristian
Kruijer, Hans J.D.
La Farge, Catherine
Metzgar, Jordan
Stech, Michael
Villarreal, Juan Carlos
McDaniel, Stuart F.
spellingShingle Lewis, Lily R.
Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M.
Biersma, Elisabeth M.
Convey, Peter
Goffinet, Bernard
Hassel, Kristian
Kruijer, Hans J.D.
La Farge, Catherine
Metzgar, Jordan
Stech, Michael
Villarreal, Juan Carlos
McDaniel, Stuart F.
Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research.
author_facet Lewis, Lily R.
Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M.
Biersma, Elisabeth M.
Convey, Peter
Goffinet, Bernard
Hassel, Kristian
Kruijer, Hans J.D.
La Farge, Catherine
Metzgar, Jordan
Stech, Michael
Villarreal, Juan Carlos
McDaniel, Stuart F.
author_sort Lewis, Lily R.
title Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research.
title_short Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research.
title_full Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research.
title_fullStr Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research.
title_full_unstemmed Future directions and priorities for Arctic bryophyte research.
title_sort future directions and priorities for arctic bryophyte research.
publisher NRC Research Press (Canadian Science Publishing)
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481069
https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic biodiversity
Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic biodiversity
Arctic
Climate change
op_source 475-497
3
Arctic Science
op_relation Arctic Science. 2017, 3 (3), 475-497.
urn:issn:2368-7460
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481069
https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
cristin:1539908
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0043
container_title Arctic Science
container_volume 3
container_issue 3
container_start_page 475
op_container_end_page 497
_version_ 1766292320328613888