台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究

本研究目的為探討圈養台灣山羌(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus)之瘤胃生態及飼糧消化率,並比較圈養與野生山羌胃腸道之異同與瘤胃乳突於組織學上之差異,藉以瞭解圈養對動物之消化生理及利用狀態之影響。試驗I個別飼養之雌山羌於餵飼後四小時以胃管抽取胃液,記錄攝食量並分析胃液,分析項目包括胃液酸鹼值及揮發性脂肪酸濃度以及體外瘤胃細菌之培養與原蟲計數。試驗II測量圈養山羌與野生山羌之消化道長度和觀察胃腸道之特徵並截取瘤胃乳突進行組織切片。試驗III進行圈養山羌飼糧消化率測定並分析瘤胃內容物與皺胃內容物之營養成分,藉以探討山羌於圈養環境或野外地區其食性之差異。 圈養山羌之胃液酸鹼值介於6...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 洪淑玲, Ang, Sow-Ling
Other Authors: 林美峰, 臺灣大學:畜產學研究所
Format: Thesis
Language:Chinese
English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/63608
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/63608/1/ntu-94-R92626009-1.pdf
id ftntaiwanuniv:oai:140.112.114.62:246246/63608
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection National Taiwan University Institutional Repository (NTUR)
op_collection_id ftntaiwanuniv
language Chinese
English
topic 台灣山羌
胃腸道
瘤胃生態
gastrointestinal tract
rumen ecology
spellingShingle 台灣山羌
胃腸道
瘤胃生態
gastrointestinal tract
rumen ecology
洪淑玲
Ang, Sow-Ling
台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究
topic_facet 台灣山羌
胃腸道
瘤胃生態
gastrointestinal tract
rumen ecology
description 本研究目的為探討圈養台灣山羌(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus)之瘤胃生態及飼糧消化率,並比較圈養與野生山羌胃腸道之異同與瘤胃乳突於組織學上之差異,藉以瞭解圈養對動物之消化生理及利用狀態之影響。試驗I個別飼養之雌山羌於餵飼後四小時以胃管抽取胃液,記錄攝食量並分析胃液,分析項目包括胃液酸鹼值及揮發性脂肪酸濃度以及體外瘤胃細菌之培養與原蟲計數。試驗II測量圈養山羌與野生山羌之消化道長度和觀察胃腸道之特徵並截取瘤胃乳突進行組織切片。試驗III進行圈養山羌飼糧消化率測定並分析瘤胃內容物與皺胃內容物之營養成分,藉以探討山羌於圈養環境或野外地區其食性之差異。 圈養山羌之胃液酸鹼值介於6.1∼6.8,且胃液中乙酸、丙酸與丁酸濃度偏低。每毫升胃液其菌數約0.03∼120.33 x 107,而總菌、纖維素分解菌與澱粉分解菌數目之間呈正相關(r >0.9)。周身纖毛原蟲佔總原蟲數30%以下,而局部纖毛原蟲則大於70%。圈養山羌瘤胃乳突為線性形狀,野生山羌其乳突為扁平舌狀,此為顯著差異處,而圈養山羌之小腸有較長之趨勢。山羌對於粗蛋白質(CP)、中洗纖維(NDF)與無氮萃取物(NFE)之消化率表現最佳,乙醚萃取物(EE)與灰分(Ash)則較差。再者,圈養與野生山羌其瘤胃內容物之CP、NDF、NFE與酸洗纖維(ADF)含量均相當,唯圈養山羌之EE有較高趨勢。 本研究結果顯示,試驗中圈養山羌所給飼之飼糧可使胃液酸鹼值維持在正常範圍,唯瘤胃中細菌數較一般畜養之反芻動物低,此導致揮發性脂肪酸之濃度亦降低,而小體型局部纖毛原蟲則為主要原蟲種別。山羌之腸道長度為體長之13.9∼15.1倍,此與“精緻性”攝食之反芻動物相似。圈養與野生山羌之瘤胃乳突形態具明顯差異,此與飼糧刺激乳突發育之影響具相關性。 The aim of this study is to investigate the rumen ecology and feed digestion in Formosan Reeves’ muntjac(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus). We also observed the effect of captive environment on animal digestive physiology by comparing the characteristics of gastrointestinal tract and tissue samples of ruminal papillae between captive and wild muntjac. In experiment I, the rumen fluid of female muntjacs was taken through a stomach tube at 4 hours after feeding for further analysis. The items analyzed include pH value, concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA), counts of rumen bacteria and protozoa. In experiment II, we measured the length of intestinal tract of muntjac and observed gastrointestinal characteristics of it which was dissected; a portion of ruminal papillae was cut off for tissue sample. In Experiment III, we analyzed the feed digestibility ration of captive muntjac and compositions of nutrients in captive muntjac rumen and abomasum content which are correlated to muntjac feeding type and living environment. Results reveal that the pH value of rumen fluids of captive muntjac ranges between 6.1∼6.8 and the concentration of VFA is lower than that of the domestic animal. The rumen bacteria count is between 0.03∼120.33 x 107 colony counts / ml rumen fluids. There is positive correlation among the quantity of total bacteria, cellulolytic bacteria and amylolytic bacteria. The percentage of Isotrichidae’s quantity among all protozoa is lower than 30%, whereas the quantity of Ophryoscolecidae is greater than 70%. The morphology of ruminal papillae between captive muntjac and wild muntjac showed distinct difference and the length of small intestinal tract tends to be longer than that of the wild. The muntjac had better digestibility on crude protein (CP), acid-detergent fiber (NDF) and nitrogen free extract (NFE). The CP, NDF, NFE and acid-detergent fiber of rumen content between captive and wild muntjac were similar whereas EE was higher in captive muntjac. In conclusion, the pH value of rumen fluid was within normal ranges, and the quantity of rumen bacteria is lower than that of the domestic ruminants, resulting in lower concentration of VFA in captive muntjac. Furthermore, study indicates that small Ophryoscolecidae is the major protozoa species in the rumen. The ratio of intestinal length to body length is approximately 13.9∼15.1 which is similar to concentrate selector. Finally, the morphology of ruminal papillae showed significant difference between captive and wild muntjac which could be related to the diets that stimulate the growth of papillae. 目錄 頁次 目錄…………………………………………………………. ………. I 表次…………………………………………………………………. II 圖次………………………………………………………………….III 誌謝……………………….………………………………………….IV 壹、中文摘要……….….……………………………………………1 貳、緒言…….…………………………………………………….3 參、文獻檢討….………………………………………………….5 一、 台灣山羌之生物學研究 二、 飼糧消化率、瘤胃內容物之鑑定與鹿科動物乳之組成 三、 瘤胃生態 肆、材料與方法….……………………………………………….34 伍、結果與討論….……………………………………………….47一、 餵飼後瘤胃生態之變化 二、 台灣山羌之生長體重與胃腸道特徵 三、 飼糧消化率與胃內容物分析 陸、結論……….………………………………………………….88柒、參考文獻.…………………………………………………….89 捌、英文摘要…….……………………………………………….94
author2 林美峰
臺灣大學:畜產學研究所
format Thesis
author 洪淑玲
Ang, Sow-Ling
author_facet 洪淑玲
Ang, Sow-Ling
author_sort 洪淑玲
title 台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究
title_short 台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究
title_full 台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究
title_fullStr 台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究
title_full_unstemmed 台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究
title_sort 台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究
publishDate 2005
url http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/63608
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/63608/1/ntu-94-R92626009-1.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-67.983,-67.983,-67.133,-67.133)
geographic Reeves
geographic_facet Reeves
genre Rangifer
genre_facet Rangifer
op_relation 王敏男。1989。台灣山羌之生物學研究-分佈現況及性別與年齡的辨 別。碩士論文。國立師範大學生物學所。台北。 白火成。1995。家畜解剖生理。三民書局印行。台北。 吳志仁。1990。動物園台灣山羌行為的研究。碩士論文。國立師範大 學生物學所。台北。 吳春利。2001。畜牧學實習(飼料分析)。合記圖書出版社。台北。 吳應寧。1976。各品種牛瘤胃內纖毛蟲叢之調查。碩士論文。國立台 灣大學獸醫學所。台北。 李登元。1995。乳牛學。台灣商務印書館。台北。 林俊義、林良恭。1983。台灣哺乳類的動物地理初探。省立博物館科 學年刊。26:53-62。 洪燕琦。1994。飼糧澱粉與蛋白質之分解速率組合對台灣山羊瘤胃 微生物的影響。碩士論文。國立台灣大學畜產學研究所。台北。 馬春祥、楊錫坤。1996。養鹿學。華香園出版社。台北。 郭欽賢。1994。家畜組織學。國立編譯館。台北。 陳怡君。1997。瓦拉米地區台灣山羌之食性、棲地利用與活動習性。 內政部85年度研究報告。玉山國家公園管理處。南投。 陳怡君。2003。瓦拉米地區台灣山羌之活動習性。博士論文。國立 師範大學生物學所。台北。 陳慧娟、陳寶忠、王光平。1990。台灣七種本土中、大型哺乳動物之 繁殖及成長生物學研究:台灣獼猴(Macaca cyclopis)與台灣山 羌(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus)成長資料初步研究。79年生態 研究第014號。行政院農委會。台北。 陳擎霞。1990。宜蘭縣舊金洋地區台灣山羌棲息地之選擇及其植被分 析。79年生態研究第015號。行政院農委會。台北。 楊价民。1997。瘤胃生態系統與反芻動物對養分的利用。藝軒圖書出 版社。台北。 董光中。1989。台灣地區牛羊鹿瘤胃纖毛蟲分類與形態學之觀察。碩 士論文。國立中興大學獸醫學所。台中。 賴景陽。1986。世界哺乳動物名典。台灣省立博物館。台北。 Aagnes, T. H., W. Sørmo, and S. D. Mathiesen. 1995. Ruminal microbial digestion in free-living, in captive lichen-fed, and in starved reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in winter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:583-591. Abe, M., T. Iriki, N. Tobe, and H. Shibui. 1981. Sequestration of holotrich protozoa in the reticulo-rumen of cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:758-765. Abou Akkada, A. R., and T. H. Blackburn. 1963. Some observations on the nitrogen metabolism of rumen proteolytic bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 31:461-469. Anthony, R. G. and N. S. Smith. 1974. Comparison of rumen and fecal analysis to describe deer diets. J. Wildl. Manage. 38:535-540. Arman, P., R. N. B. Kay, E. D. Goodall, and G. A. M. Sharman. 1974. The composition and yield of milk from captive red deer(Cervus elaphus L.). J. Reprod. Fert. 37:67-84. Beharka, A. A., T. G. Nagaraja, J. L. Morrill, G. A. Kennedy, and R. D. Klemm. 1998. Effects of form of the diet on anatomical, microbial, and fermentative development of the rumen of neonatal calves. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1946-1955. Bryant, M. P. and I. M. Robinson. 1961. An improved nonselective culture medium for ruminal bacteria and its use in determining diurnal variation in numbers of bacteria in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1446-1456. Bryant, M. P. and I. M. Robinson. 1968. Effects of diet, time after feeding, and position sampled on numbers of viable bacteria in the bovine rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 51:1446-1456. Chapman, N. G., M. Furlong, and S. Harris. 1997. Reproductive strategies and the influence of date of birth on growth and sexual development of an aseasonally- breeding ungulate: Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Zool. Lond. 241:551-570. Christiansen, W. C., W. Woods, and W. Burroughs. 1964. Ration characteristics influencing rumen protozoal populations. J. Anim. Sci. 23:984-988. Cooker, B. A., C. J. Sniffen, W. H. Hoover, and L. L. Johnson. 1978. Solvents for soluble nitrogen measurements in feed stuffs. J. Dairy Sci. 61:437-447. Craig, W. M., G. A. Broderick, and D.B. Ricker. 1987. Quantitation of microorganisms associated with the particulate phase of ruminal ingesta. J. Nutr. 117:56-62. Dearth, R. N., B. A. Dehority, and E. L. Potter. 1974. Rumen microbial numbers in lamb as affected by level of feed intake and dietary diethylstilestrol. J. Anim. Sci. 38:991-996。 Dehority, B. A. 2003. Rumen Microbiology. Nottingham University Press. U.K. Di Giancamillo, A., G. Bosi, S. Arrighi, G. Savoini, and C. Domeneghini. 2003. The influence of different fibrous supplements in the diet on ruminal histology and histometry in veal calves. Histol. Histopathol. 18:727- 733. Dönmez, N., M. A. Karslı, A. Çınar, T. Aksu, and E. Baytok. 2003. The effects of different silage additives on rumen protozoan number and volatile fatty acid concentration in sheep fed corn silage. Small Ruminant Res. 48:227-231. Erwin, E. S., G. J. Marco, and E. M. Emery. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1768-1771. Forsyth, D. M. and K. W. Fraser. 1999. Seasonal changes in the rumen morphology of Himalayan tahr(Hemitragus jemlahicus)in the Two Thumb Range, South Island, New Zealand. J. Zool. Lond. 249:241-248. Froetschel, M. A., A. C. Martin, H. E. Amos, and J. J. Evans. 1990. Effects of zinc sulfate concentration and feeding frequency of ruminal protozoal numbers, fermentation patterns and amino acid passage in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 68:2874-2884. Ghorbani, G. R., D. P. Morgavi, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. A. Z. Leedle. 2002. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1977-1985. Goering, H. K. and P. J. van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis. Agric. Handbook No.379, Agric. Rev. Serv., US Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. Hofmann, R. R. 1985. Digestive physiology of the deer-their morphophysiological specialization and adaptation. pp. 393-407. in: P. F. Fennessy and K. R. Drew ed. Biology of Deer Production. The Royal Society of New Zealand . N. Z. Hofmann, R. R. 1988. Anatomy of the gastro-intestinal tract. pp. 14-43. in: D. C. Church ed. The Ruminant Animal Digestive Physiology and Nutrition. Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Hungate, R.E. 1966. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Academic Press. N.Y. Jackson, J. E., D. I. Chapman, and O. Dansie. 1977. A note on the food of Muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Zool. Lond. 183:546-548. Kozaki, M., R. Oura, and J. Sekine. 1991. Studies on digestion physiology of herbivorous feral animals. II. The comparison of intake of total digestible nutrients among diverse sizes of ruminant and monogastrric animals. J. Fac. Agric. Tottori Univ. 27:61-68. Leedle, J. A. Z. and R. B. Hespell. 1980. Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate - utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbial. 39:709-719 Long, J. L. 2003. Introduced mammals to the world. pp. 394- 395.CSIRO publishing. Australia. Martinka, C. J. 1968. Habitat relationships of white-tailed and mule deer in Northern Montana. J. Wildl. Manage. 32:558-565. McCullough, D. R., K. C. J. Pei, and Y. Wang. 2000. Home range, activity patterns, and habitat relations of Reeves’ muntjacs in Taiwan. J. Wildl. Manage. 64:430- 441. McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, and C. A. Morgan. 2002. Animal Nutrition, 6th ed. Ashford Colour Press Ltd., Gosport. McGavin, M. D. and J. L. Morrill. 1976. Scanning electron microscopy of ruminal papillae in calves fed various amounts and forms of roughage. Am. J. Vet. Res. 37:497- 508. Murphy, M. R., P. E. Drone, JR., and S. T. Woodford. 1985. Factors stimulating migration of holotrich protozoa into the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:1329-1331. Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker’s Mammals of The World. 6th ed., vol. 2. The Johns Hopkins Press. Baltimore and London. Ogimoto, K. and S. Imai. 1981. Atlas of Rumen Microbiology. Japan Scientific Societies Press. Tokyo. Oh, J. H., I. D. Hume, and D. T. Torell. 1972. Development of microbial activity in the alimentary tract of lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 35:450-459. Pearson, H. A. 1965. Rumen organisms in white-tailed deer from South Texas. J. Wildl. Manage. 29:493-496. Pearson, H. A. 1969. Rumen microbial ecology in mule deer. Appl. Microbiol. 17:819-824. Pei, K. 1994. Reproductive biology of male Formosan Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi micrurus). J. Zool. Lond. 233:293-306. Pei, K. 1996. Post-natal growth of the Formosan Reeves’ muntjac Muntiacus reevesi micrurus. Zool. Stud. 35:111- 117. Rabinowitz, A., T. Myint, S. T. Khaing, and S. Rabinowitz. 1999. Description of the leaf deer (Muntiacus putaoensis), a new species of muntjac from northern Myanmar. J. Zool. Lond. 249:427-435. Sadleir, R. M. F. S. 1982. Reproduction of female cervids. pp. 123-144. in: C. M. Wemmer ed. Biology and management of the cervidae. Smithsonian Institution Press. London. Sahu, N. P. and D. N. Kamra. 2002. Microbial eco-system of the gastro-intestinal tract of wild herbivorous animals. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 21:207-230. Sander, E. G., R. G. Warner, H. N. Harrison, and J. K. Loosli. 1959. The stimulatory effect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionate on the development of rumen mucosa in the young calf. J. Dairy Sci. 42:1600-1605. SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User’s guide. Release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Schaller, G. B. and E. S. Vrba. 1996. Description of the giant muntjac (Megamuntiacus vuquangensis) in Laos. J. Mammal. 77:675-683. Schurg, W. A, D. L. Frei, P. R. Cheeke, and D. W. Holtan. 1977. Utilization of whole corn plant pellets by horses and rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 45:1317-1321. Sheng, H., and H. Lu. 1980. Current studies on the rare Chinese black muntjac. J. Nat. Hist. 14:803-807. Trautmann, A., and J. Fiebiger. 1957. Fundamentals of The Histology of Domestic Animals. A Division of Cornell University Press. N.Y. Van Keulen, J., and B. A. Young. 1977. Evaluation of acid- insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci. 44:282-287. van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lenis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. Veira, D. M. 1986. The role of ciliate protozoa in nutrition of the ruminant. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1547-1560. Wardrop, I. D. and J. B. Coombe. 1960. The post-natal growth of the visceral organs of the lamb. J. Agri. Sci. 54:140-143. Williams, A. G. and G. S. Coleman. 1988. The rumen protozoa. pp. 77-128. in:P. N. Hobson. ed. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Elsevier Applied Science. London. Yahner, R. H. 1980. Activity patterns of captive Reeve’s muntjacs (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Mamm. 61:368-371.
_version_ 1766175347831734272
spelling ftntaiwanuniv:oai:140.112.114.62:246246/63608 2023-05-15T18:04:05+02:00 台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究 Study on the characteristics of gastrointestinal tract and rumen ecology of Formosan Reeves' muntjac 洪淑玲 Ang, Sow-Ling 林美峰 臺灣大學:畜產學研究所 2005 671716 bytes application/pdf http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/63608 http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/63608/1/ntu-94-R92626009-1.pdf zh-TW en_US chi eng 王敏男。1989。台灣山羌之生物學研究-分佈現況及性別與年齡的辨 別。碩士論文。國立師範大學生物學所。台北。 白火成。1995。家畜解剖生理。三民書局印行。台北。 吳志仁。1990。動物園台灣山羌行為的研究。碩士論文。國立師範大 學生物學所。台北。 吳春利。2001。畜牧學實習(飼料分析)。合記圖書出版社。台北。 吳應寧。1976。各品種牛瘤胃內纖毛蟲叢之調查。碩士論文。國立台 灣大學獸醫學所。台北。 李登元。1995。乳牛學。台灣商務印書館。台北。 林俊義、林良恭。1983。台灣哺乳類的動物地理初探。省立博物館科 學年刊。26:53-62。 洪燕琦。1994。飼糧澱粉與蛋白質之分解速率組合對台灣山羊瘤胃 微生物的影響。碩士論文。國立台灣大學畜產學研究所。台北。 馬春祥、楊錫坤。1996。養鹿學。華香園出版社。台北。 郭欽賢。1994。家畜組織學。國立編譯館。台北。 陳怡君。1997。瓦拉米地區台灣山羌之食性、棲地利用與活動習性。 內政部85年度研究報告。玉山國家公園管理處。南投。 陳怡君。2003。瓦拉米地區台灣山羌之活動習性。博士論文。國立 師範大學生物學所。台北。 陳慧娟、陳寶忠、王光平。1990。台灣七種本土中、大型哺乳動物之 繁殖及成長生物學研究:台灣獼猴(Macaca cyclopis)與台灣山 羌(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus)成長資料初步研究。79年生態 研究第014號。行政院農委會。台北。 陳擎霞。1990。宜蘭縣舊金洋地區台灣山羌棲息地之選擇及其植被分 析。79年生態研究第015號。行政院農委會。台北。 楊价民。1997。瘤胃生態系統與反芻動物對養分的利用。藝軒圖書出 版社。台北。 董光中。1989。台灣地區牛羊鹿瘤胃纖毛蟲分類與形態學之觀察。碩 士論文。國立中興大學獸醫學所。台中。 賴景陽。1986。世界哺乳動物名典。台灣省立博物館。台北。 Aagnes, T. H., W. Sørmo, and S. D. Mathiesen. 1995. Ruminal microbial digestion in free-living, in captive lichen-fed, and in starved reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in winter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:583-591. Abe, M., T. Iriki, N. Tobe, and H. Shibui. 1981. Sequestration of holotrich protozoa in the reticulo-rumen of cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:758-765. Abou Akkada, A. R., and T. H. Blackburn. 1963. Some observations on the nitrogen metabolism of rumen proteolytic bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 31:461-469. Anthony, R. G. and N. S. Smith. 1974. Comparison of rumen and fecal analysis to describe deer diets. J. Wildl. Manage. 38:535-540. Arman, P., R. N. B. Kay, E. D. Goodall, and G. A. M. Sharman. 1974. The composition and yield of milk from captive red deer(Cervus elaphus L.). J. Reprod. Fert. 37:67-84. Beharka, A. A., T. G. Nagaraja, J. L. Morrill, G. A. Kennedy, and R. D. Klemm. 1998. Effects of form of the diet on anatomical, microbial, and fermentative development of the rumen of neonatal calves. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1946-1955. Bryant, M. P. and I. M. Robinson. 1961. An improved nonselective culture medium for ruminal bacteria and its use in determining diurnal variation in numbers of bacteria in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1446-1456. Bryant, M. P. and I. M. Robinson. 1968. Effects of diet, time after feeding, and position sampled on numbers of viable bacteria in the bovine rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 51:1446-1456. Chapman, N. G., M. Furlong, and S. Harris. 1997. Reproductive strategies and the influence of date of birth on growth and sexual development of an aseasonally- breeding ungulate: Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Zool. Lond. 241:551-570. Christiansen, W. C., W. Woods, and W. Burroughs. 1964. Ration characteristics influencing rumen protozoal populations. J. Anim. Sci. 23:984-988. Cooker, B. A., C. J. Sniffen, W. H. Hoover, and L. L. Johnson. 1978. Solvents for soluble nitrogen measurements in feed stuffs. J. Dairy Sci. 61:437-447. Craig, W. M., G. A. Broderick, and D.B. Ricker. 1987. Quantitation of microorganisms associated with the particulate phase of ruminal ingesta. J. Nutr. 117:56-62. Dearth, R. N., B. A. Dehority, and E. L. Potter. 1974. Rumen microbial numbers in lamb as affected by level of feed intake and dietary diethylstilestrol. J. Anim. Sci. 38:991-996。 Dehority, B. A. 2003. Rumen Microbiology. Nottingham University Press. U.K. Di Giancamillo, A., G. Bosi, S. Arrighi, G. Savoini, and C. Domeneghini. 2003. The influence of different fibrous supplements in the diet on ruminal histology and histometry in veal calves. Histol. Histopathol. 18:727- 733. Dönmez, N., M. A. Karslı, A. Çınar, T. Aksu, and E. Baytok. 2003. The effects of different silage additives on rumen protozoan number and volatile fatty acid concentration in sheep fed corn silage. Small Ruminant Res. 48:227-231. Erwin, E. S., G. J. Marco, and E. M. Emery. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1768-1771. Forsyth, D. M. and K. W. Fraser. 1999. Seasonal changes in the rumen morphology of Himalayan tahr(Hemitragus jemlahicus)in the Two Thumb Range, South Island, New Zealand. J. Zool. Lond. 249:241-248. Froetschel, M. A., A. C. Martin, H. E. Amos, and J. J. Evans. 1990. Effects of zinc sulfate concentration and feeding frequency of ruminal protozoal numbers, fermentation patterns and amino acid passage in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 68:2874-2884. Ghorbani, G. R., D. P. Morgavi, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. A. Z. Leedle. 2002. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1977-1985. Goering, H. K. and P. J. van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis. Agric. Handbook No.379, Agric. Rev. Serv., US Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. Hofmann, R. R. 1985. Digestive physiology of the deer-their morphophysiological specialization and adaptation. pp. 393-407. in: P. F. Fennessy and K. R. Drew ed. Biology of Deer Production. The Royal Society of New Zealand . N. Z. Hofmann, R. R. 1988. Anatomy of the gastro-intestinal tract. pp. 14-43. in: D. C. Church ed. The Ruminant Animal Digestive Physiology and Nutrition. Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Hungate, R.E. 1966. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Academic Press. N.Y. Jackson, J. E., D. I. Chapman, and O. Dansie. 1977. A note on the food of Muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Zool. Lond. 183:546-548. Kozaki, M., R. Oura, and J. Sekine. 1991. Studies on digestion physiology of herbivorous feral animals. II. The comparison of intake of total digestible nutrients among diverse sizes of ruminant and monogastrric animals. J. Fac. Agric. Tottori Univ. 27:61-68. Leedle, J. A. Z. and R. B. Hespell. 1980. Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate - utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbial. 39:709-719 Long, J. L. 2003. Introduced mammals to the world. pp. 394- 395.CSIRO publishing. Australia. Martinka, C. J. 1968. Habitat relationships of white-tailed and mule deer in Northern Montana. J. Wildl. Manage. 32:558-565. McCullough, D. R., K. C. J. Pei, and Y. Wang. 2000. Home range, activity patterns, and habitat relations of Reeves’ muntjacs in Taiwan. J. Wildl. Manage. 64:430- 441. McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, and C. A. Morgan. 2002. Animal Nutrition, 6th ed. Ashford Colour Press Ltd., Gosport. McGavin, M. D. and J. L. Morrill. 1976. Scanning electron microscopy of ruminal papillae in calves fed various amounts and forms of roughage. Am. J. Vet. Res. 37:497- 508. Murphy, M. R., P. E. Drone, JR., and S. T. Woodford. 1985. Factors stimulating migration of holotrich protozoa into the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:1329-1331. Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker’s Mammals of The World. 6th ed., vol. 2. The Johns Hopkins Press. Baltimore and London. Ogimoto, K. and S. Imai. 1981. Atlas of Rumen Microbiology. Japan Scientific Societies Press. Tokyo. Oh, J. H., I. D. Hume, and D. T. Torell. 1972. Development of microbial activity in the alimentary tract of lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 35:450-459. Pearson, H. A. 1965. Rumen organisms in white-tailed deer from South Texas. J. Wildl. Manage. 29:493-496. Pearson, H. A. 1969. Rumen microbial ecology in mule deer. Appl. Microbiol. 17:819-824. Pei, K. 1994. Reproductive biology of male Formosan Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi micrurus). J. Zool. Lond. 233:293-306. Pei, K. 1996. Post-natal growth of the Formosan Reeves’ muntjac Muntiacus reevesi micrurus. Zool. Stud. 35:111- 117. Rabinowitz, A., T. Myint, S. T. Khaing, and S. Rabinowitz. 1999. Description of the leaf deer (Muntiacus putaoensis), a new species of muntjac from northern Myanmar. J. Zool. Lond. 249:427-435. Sadleir, R. M. F. S. 1982. Reproduction of female cervids. pp. 123-144. in: C. M. Wemmer ed. Biology and management of the cervidae. Smithsonian Institution Press. London. Sahu, N. P. and D. N. Kamra. 2002. Microbial eco-system of the gastro-intestinal tract of wild herbivorous animals. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 21:207-230. Sander, E. G., R. G. Warner, H. N. Harrison, and J. K. Loosli. 1959. The stimulatory effect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionate on the development of rumen mucosa in the young calf. J. Dairy Sci. 42:1600-1605. SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User’s guide. Release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Schaller, G. B. and E. S. Vrba. 1996. Description of the giant muntjac (Megamuntiacus vuquangensis) in Laos. J. Mammal. 77:675-683. Schurg, W. A, D. L. Frei, P. R. Cheeke, and D. W. Holtan. 1977. Utilization of whole corn plant pellets by horses and rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 45:1317-1321. Sheng, H., and H. Lu. 1980. Current studies on the rare Chinese black muntjac. J. Nat. Hist. 14:803-807. Trautmann, A., and J. Fiebiger. 1957. Fundamentals of The Histology of Domestic Animals. A Division of Cornell University Press. N.Y. Van Keulen, J., and B. A. Young. 1977. Evaluation of acid- insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci. 44:282-287. van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lenis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. Veira, D. M. 1986. The role of ciliate protozoa in nutrition of the ruminant. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1547-1560. Wardrop, I. D. and J. B. Coombe. 1960. The post-natal growth of the visceral organs of the lamb. J. Agri. Sci. 54:140-143. Williams, A. G. and G. S. Coleman. 1988. The rumen protozoa. pp. 77-128. in:P. N. Hobson. ed. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Elsevier Applied Science. London. Yahner, R. H. 1980. Activity patterns of captive Reeve’s muntjacs (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Mamm. 61:368-371. 台灣山羌 胃腸道 瘤胃生態 gastrointestinal tract rumen ecology thesis 2005 ftntaiwanuniv 2016-02-20T00:22:28Z 本研究目的為探討圈養台灣山羌(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus)之瘤胃生態及飼糧消化率,並比較圈養與野生山羌胃腸道之異同與瘤胃乳突於組織學上之差異,藉以瞭解圈養對動物之消化生理及利用狀態之影響。試驗I個別飼養之雌山羌於餵飼後四小時以胃管抽取胃液,記錄攝食量並分析胃液,分析項目包括胃液酸鹼值及揮發性脂肪酸濃度以及體外瘤胃細菌之培養與原蟲計數。試驗II測量圈養山羌與野生山羌之消化道長度和觀察胃腸道之特徵並截取瘤胃乳突進行組織切片。試驗III進行圈養山羌飼糧消化率測定並分析瘤胃內容物與皺胃內容物之營養成分,藉以探討山羌於圈養環境或野外地區其食性之差異。 圈養山羌之胃液酸鹼值介於6.1∼6.8,且胃液中乙酸、丙酸與丁酸濃度偏低。每毫升胃液其菌數約0.03∼120.33 x 107,而總菌、纖維素分解菌與澱粉分解菌數目之間呈正相關(r >0.9)。周身纖毛原蟲佔總原蟲數30%以下,而局部纖毛原蟲則大於70%。圈養山羌瘤胃乳突為線性形狀,野生山羌其乳突為扁平舌狀,此為顯著差異處,而圈養山羌之小腸有較長之趨勢。山羌對於粗蛋白質(CP)、中洗纖維(NDF)與無氮萃取物(NFE)之消化率表現最佳,乙醚萃取物(EE)與灰分(Ash)則較差。再者,圈養與野生山羌其瘤胃內容物之CP、NDF、NFE與酸洗纖維(ADF)含量均相當,唯圈養山羌之EE有較高趨勢。 本研究結果顯示,試驗中圈養山羌所給飼之飼糧可使胃液酸鹼值維持在正常範圍,唯瘤胃中細菌數較一般畜養之反芻動物低,此導致揮發性脂肪酸之濃度亦降低,而小體型局部纖毛原蟲則為主要原蟲種別。山羌之腸道長度為體長之13.9∼15.1倍,此與“精緻性”攝食之反芻動物相似。圈養與野生山羌之瘤胃乳突形態具明顯差異,此與飼糧刺激乳突發育之影響具相關性。 The aim of this study is to investigate the rumen ecology and feed digestion in Formosan Reeves’ muntjac(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus). We also observed the effect of captive environment on animal digestive physiology by comparing the characteristics of gastrointestinal tract and tissue samples of ruminal papillae between captive and wild muntjac. In experiment I, the rumen fluid of female muntjacs was taken through a stomach tube at 4 hours after feeding for further analysis. The items analyzed include pH value, concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA), counts of rumen bacteria and protozoa. In experiment II, we measured the length of intestinal tract of muntjac and observed gastrointestinal characteristics of it which was dissected; a portion of ruminal papillae was cut off for tissue sample. In Experiment III, we analyzed the feed digestibility ration of captive muntjac and compositions of nutrients in captive muntjac rumen and abomasum content which are correlated to muntjac feeding type and living environment. Results reveal that the pH value of rumen fluids of captive muntjac ranges between 6.1∼6.8 and the concentration of VFA is lower than that of the domestic animal. The rumen bacteria count is between 0.03∼120.33 x 107 colony counts / ml rumen fluids. There is positive correlation among the quantity of total bacteria, cellulolytic bacteria and amylolytic bacteria. The percentage of Isotrichidae’s quantity among all protozoa is lower than 30%, whereas the quantity of Ophryoscolecidae is greater than 70%. The morphology of ruminal papillae between captive muntjac and wild muntjac showed distinct difference and the length of small intestinal tract tends to be longer than that of the wild. The muntjac had better digestibility on crude protein (CP), acid-detergent fiber (NDF) and nitrogen free extract (NFE). The CP, NDF, NFE and acid-detergent fiber of rumen content between captive and wild muntjac were similar whereas EE was higher in captive muntjac. In conclusion, the pH value of rumen fluid was within normal ranges, and the quantity of rumen bacteria is lower than that of the domestic ruminants, resulting in lower concentration of VFA in captive muntjac. Furthermore, study indicates that small Ophryoscolecidae is the major protozoa species in the rumen. The ratio of intestinal length to body length is approximately 13.9∼15.1 which is similar to concentrate selector. Finally, the morphology of ruminal papillae showed significant difference between captive and wild muntjac which could be related to the diets that stimulate the growth of papillae. 目錄 頁次 目錄…………………………………………………………. ………. I 表次…………………………………………………………………. II 圖次………………………………………………………………….III 誌謝……………………….………………………………………….IV 壹、中文摘要……….….……………………………………………1 貳、緒言…….…………………………………………………….3 參、文獻檢討….………………………………………………….5 一、 台灣山羌之生物學研究 二、 飼糧消化率、瘤胃內容物之鑑定與鹿科動物乳之組成 三、 瘤胃生態 肆、材料與方法….……………………………………………….34 伍、結果與討論….……………………………………………….47一、 餵飼後瘤胃生態之變化 二、 台灣山羌之生長體重與胃腸道特徵 三、 飼糧消化率與胃內容物分析 陸、結論……….………………………………………………….88柒、參考文獻.…………………………………………………….89 捌、英文摘要…….……………………………………………….94 Thesis Rangifer National Taiwan University Institutional Repository (NTUR) Reeves ENVELOPE(-67.983,-67.983,-67.133,-67.133)