Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna

The expansion of pelagic longline tuna fisheries, along with increasing fisheries observer coverage, has resulted in an increased documentation of interactions with small cetacean marine mammals. In particular, western North Atlantic fisheries interact with short- and long-finned pilot whale and Ros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kerstetter, David W.
Format: Conference Object
Language:unknown
Published: NSUWorks 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/212
id ftnsoutheastern:oai:nsuworks.nova.edu:occ_facpresentations-1246
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnsoutheastern:oai:nsuworks.nova.edu:occ_facpresentations-1246 2023-05-15T17:30:51+02:00 Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna Kerstetter, David W. 2012-05-01T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/212 unknown NSUWorks https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/212 Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures Marine Biology Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology conference 2012 ftnsoutheastern 2022-04-10T21:30:52Z The expansion of pelagic longline tuna fisheries, along with increasing fisheries observer coverage, has resulted in an increased documentation of interactions with small cetacean marine mammals. In particular, western North Atlantic fisheries interact with short- and long-finned pilot whale and Rosso's dolphins, while the central North Pacific fisheries interact with false killer whales. Other species infrequently also interact with this gear type, including bottlenose and common dolphins. Small cetacean interactions include depredation of caught fishes, hooking events, and entanglements. Although some seasonality and area effects occur with small cetacean interaction rates, such effects are generally weak, and time-area closure discussions for these fisheries have met with strong opposition within U.S. constituent-based take reduction teams. A variety of alternative mitigation methods have instead been examined, including restrictions on the lengths of pelagic longline sets, limited soak times, and changes to baits. Another strategy involves requiring vessels to move a selected distance away from the location of any interaction. More recently, investigations into so-called “weak hook” technology, which exploit the weight difference between the target tunas and the bycatch small cetaceans, have been underway in the central North Pacific and the western North Atlantic. All of these strategies will be discussed within the context of reducing small cetacean interactions with pelagic longline fisheries. Conference Object North Atlantic Nova Southeastern University: NSU Works Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection Nova Southeastern University: NSU Works
op_collection_id ftnsoutheastern
language unknown
topic Marine Biology
Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
spellingShingle Marine Biology
Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
Kerstetter, David W.
Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna
topic_facet Marine Biology
Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
description The expansion of pelagic longline tuna fisheries, along with increasing fisheries observer coverage, has resulted in an increased documentation of interactions with small cetacean marine mammals. In particular, western North Atlantic fisheries interact with short- and long-finned pilot whale and Rosso's dolphins, while the central North Pacific fisheries interact with false killer whales. Other species infrequently also interact with this gear type, including bottlenose and common dolphins. Small cetacean interactions include depredation of caught fishes, hooking events, and entanglements. Although some seasonality and area effects occur with small cetacean interaction rates, such effects are generally weak, and time-area closure discussions for these fisheries have met with strong opposition within U.S. constituent-based take reduction teams. A variety of alternative mitigation methods have instead been examined, including restrictions on the lengths of pelagic longline sets, limited soak times, and changes to baits. Another strategy involves requiring vessels to move a selected distance away from the location of any interaction. More recently, investigations into so-called “weak hook” technology, which exploit the weight difference between the target tunas and the bycatch small cetaceans, have been underway in the central North Pacific and the western North Atlantic. All of these strategies will be discussed within the context of reducing small cetacean interactions with pelagic longline fisheries.
format Conference Object
author Kerstetter, David W.
author_facet Kerstetter, David W.
author_sort Kerstetter, David W.
title Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna
title_short Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna
title_full Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna
title_fullStr Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation and Deterrence Methods to Reduce Marine Mammal Interactions in Longline Fisheries for Tuna
title_sort mitigation and deterrence methods to reduce marine mammal interactions in longline fisheries for tuna
publisher NSUWorks
publishDate 2012
url https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/212
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures
op_relation https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/212
_version_ 1766127967599067136