Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs

Alternatives in ecosystem‐based management often differ with respect to trade‐offs between ecosystem values. Ecosystem or food‐web models and demographic models are typically employed to evaluate alternatives, but the approaches are rarely integrated to uncover conflicts between values. We applied m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Author: Kadin, Martina
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Enheten för miljöforskning och övervakning 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-3309
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385
id ftnrm:oai:DiVA.org:nrm-3309
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnrm:oai:DiVA.org:nrm-3309 2023-05-15T18:41:32+02:00 Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs Kadin, Martina 2019 application/pdf http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-3309 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385 eng eng Enheten för miljöforskning och övervakning Ecology and Evolution, 2045-7758, 2019 http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-3309 doi:10.1002/ece3.5385 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Ecology Ekologi Article in journal info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2019 ftnrm https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385 2021-10-08T07:21:19Z Alternatives in ecosystem‐based management often differ with respect to trade‐offs between ecosystem values. Ecosystem or food‐web models and demographic models are typically employed to evaluate alternatives, but the approaches are rarely integrated to uncover conflicts between values. We applied multistate models to a capture–recapture dataset on common guillemots Uria aalge breeding in the Baltic Sea to identify factors influencing survival. The estimated relationships were employed together with Ecopath‐with‐Ecosim food‐web model simulations to project guillemot survival under six future scenarios incorporating climate change. The scenarios were based on management alternatives for eutrophication and cod fisheries, issues considered top priority for regional management, but without known direct effects on the guillemot population. Our demographic models identified prey quantity (abundance and biomass of sprat Sprattus sprattus) as the main factor influencing guillemot survival. Most scenarios resulted in projections of increased survival, in the near (2016–2040) and distant (2060–2085) future. However, in the scenario of reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing, guillemot survival was projected to be lower in both future periods due to lower sprat stocks. Matrix population models suggested a substantial decline of the guillemot population in the near future, 24% per 10 years, and a smaller reduction, 1.1% per 10 years, in the distant future. To date, many stakeholders and Baltic Sea governments have supported reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing and implementation is underway. Negative effects on nonfocal species have previously not been uncovered, but our results show that the scenario is likely to negatively impact the guillemot population. Linking model results allowed identifying trade‐offs associated with management alternatives. This information is critical to thorough evaluation by decision‐makers, but not easily obtained by food‐web models or demographic models in isolation. Appropriate datasets are often available, making it feasible to apply a linked approach for better‐informed decisions in ecosystem‐based management. Article in Journal/Newspaper Uria aalge uria Swedish Museum of Natural History: Publications (DiVA) Ecology and Evolution 9 15 8587 8600
institution Open Polar
collection Swedish Museum of Natural History: Publications (DiVA)
op_collection_id ftnrm
language English
topic Ecology
Ekologi
spellingShingle Ecology
Ekologi
Kadin, Martina
Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
topic_facet Ecology
Ekologi
description Alternatives in ecosystem‐based management often differ with respect to trade‐offs between ecosystem values. Ecosystem or food‐web models and demographic models are typically employed to evaluate alternatives, but the approaches are rarely integrated to uncover conflicts between values. We applied multistate models to a capture–recapture dataset on common guillemots Uria aalge breeding in the Baltic Sea to identify factors influencing survival. The estimated relationships were employed together with Ecopath‐with‐Ecosim food‐web model simulations to project guillemot survival under six future scenarios incorporating climate change. The scenarios were based on management alternatives for eutrophication and cod fisheries, issues considered top priority for regional management, but without known direct effects on the guillemot population. Our demographic models identified prey quantity (abundance and biomass of sprat Sprattus sprattus) as the main factor influencing guillemot survival. Most scenarios resulted in projections of increased survival, in the near (2016–2040) and distant (2060–2085) future. However, in the scenario of reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing, guillemot survival was projected to be lower in both future periods due to lower sprat stocks. Matrix population models suggested a substantial decline of the guillemot population in the near future, 24% per 10 years, and a smaller reduction, 1.1% per 10 years, in the distant future. To date, many stakeholders and Baltic Sea governments have supported reduced nutrient input and precautionary cod fishing and implementation is underway. Negative effects on nonfocal species have previously not been uncovered, but our results show that the scenario is likely to negatively impact the guillemot population. Linking model results allowed identifying trade‐offs associated with management alternatives. This information is critical to thorough evaluation by decision‐makers, but not easily obtained by food‐web models or demographic models in isolation. Appropriate datasets are often available, making it feasible to apply a linked approach for better‐informed decisions in ecosystem‐based management.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kadin, Martina
author_facet Kadin, Martina
author_sort Kadin, Martina
title Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_short Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_full Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_fullStr Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_full_unstemmed Linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
title_sort linking demographic and food‐web models to understand management trade‐offs
publisher Enheten för miljöforskning och övervakning
publishDate 2019
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-3309
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385
genre Uria aalge
uria
genre_facet Uria aalge
uria
op_relation Ecology and Evolution, 2045-7758, 2019
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-3309
doi:10.1002/ece3.5385
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5385
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 9
container_issue 15
container_start_page 8587
op_container_end_page 8600
_version_ 1766231071345606656