A life detection problem in a High Arctic microbial community

• Published in: Planetary and Space Science
• Main Authors: Rogers, J. D., Perreault, N. N., Niederberger, T. D., Lichten, C., Whyte, L. G., Nadeau, J. L.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2009
• Subjects: High Arctic; cold springs; sulfur oxidizers; biosignature; fluorescence microscopy; FISH; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.06.014; https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=3f0c60a5-aeeb-4d90-9cae-1cd03fbadc84; https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=3f0c60a5-aeeb-4d90-9cae-1cd03fbadc84

Fluorescent labeling of bacterial cell walls, DNA, and metabolic processes demonstrates high (potentially single molecule) sensitivity, is non-invasive, and in some cases can differentiate strains and species. Robust microscopes such as the custom instruments presented here can provide good image quality in the field and are potentially suitable for flight. However, ambiguous or false-positive results with bacterial stains can occur and can create difficulties in interpretation even on Earth. We present a “real” life detection problem in a sample of biofilms taken from the Canadian High Arctic. The samples consisted of numerous small sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and larger structures resembling fungi or diatoms. The identity of these latter structures remained ambiguous until electron microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy were performed, indicating that they were unusual sulfur minerals probably precipitated by the bacterial communities. While such mineral structures may possibly serve as biosignatures after the cells have disappeared, it is important that they not be mistaken for cells themselves. It is also possible that unusual mineral structures will be performed under extraterrestrial conditions, so great care is needed to differentiate cell structures from minerals. Peer reviewed: Yes NRC publication: No