When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?

We tested the efficacy of three methods (historical nest search, broadcast search, and tree transect search) for detecting presence of the Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) at occupied nest areas during the 1994 breeding season using only a single visit to a previously known nest area. We used d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boyce, Douglas A., Kennedy, Patricia L., Beier, Paul, Ingraldi, Michael F., MacVean, Susie R., Siders, Melissa S., Squires, John R., Woodbridge, Brian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/
http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/7/Boyce_etal_2005_goshawk_surveys.pdf
http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/publications/journal-of-raptor-research
id ftnortharizonaun:oai:openknowledge.nau.edu:982
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnortharizonaun:oai:openknowledge.nau.edu:982 2023-05-15T13:00:50+02:00 When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas? Boyce, Douglas A. Kennedy, Patricia L. Beier, Paul Ingraldi, Michael F. MacVean, Susie R. Siders, Melissa S. Squires, John R. Woodbridge, Brian 2005 text http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/ http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/7/Boyce_etal_2005_goshawk_surveys.pdf http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/publications/journal-of-raptor-research en eng http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/7/Boyce_etal_2005_goshawk_surveys.pdf Boyce, Douglas A. and Kennedy, Patricia L. and Beier, Paul and Ingraldi, Michael F. and MacVean, Susie R. and Siders, Melissa S. and Squires, John R. and Woodbridge, Brian (2005) When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas? Journal of Raptor Research, 39 (3). pp. 296-302. ISSN 0892-1016 QL Zoology Article PeerReviewed 2005 ftnortharizonaun 2020-12-11T11:43:45Z We tested the efficacy of three methods (historical nest search, broadcast search, and tree transect search) for detecting presence of the Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) at occupied nest areas during the 1994 breeding season using only a single visit to a previously known nest area. We used detection rates in a probability model to determine how many visits are required to have confidence in reporting absence of goshawks. The purpose of this study is to understand if the three methods for detecting goshawks are robust enough for managers to rely on them for making land management decisions that may impact goshawk nest areas. Blind tests were conducted throughout the western United States. Results were similar among methods with goshawk presence going undetected at 36-42% of the Occupied nest areas after a single visit. These results indicate that a single visit to a nest area is inadequate to provide reliable information on nest area occupation. Our probability of detection model showed that if each detection method is repeated three (historical or tree transect) or four (broadcast) Limes, goshawk absence can be inferred with a high level of confidence. Conclusions regarding nest area Occupation using a single visit sampling method should be made with utmost caution. Classifying a nest area as vacant, when in fact goshawks are present, is a serious concern and leads to spurious Conclusions. Land managers making habitat-altering decisions should not rely on a single visit to nest areas to establish the absence of goshawks. Possibilities for improving the detection of nesting goshawks include Multiple independent visits using the same method, using a sequence of techniques in combination to yield an improved Cumulative probability of detection, or developing a new method yielding a higher probability of detection. The historical nest search obtained the best results, followed by the tree transect and broadcast search. Article in Journal/Newspaper Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk OpenKnowledge@NAU (Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff)
institution Open Polar
collection OpenKnowledge@NAU (Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff)
op_collection_id ftnortharizonaun
language English
topic QL Zoology
spellingShingle QL Zoology
Boyce, Douglas A.
Kennedy, Patricia L.
Beier, Paul
Ingraldi, Michael F.
MacVean, Susie R.
Siders, Melissa S.
Squires, John R.
Woodbridge, Brian
When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?
topic_facet QL Zoology
description We tested the efficacy of three methods (historical nest search, broadcast search, and tree transect search) for detecting presence of the Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) at occupied nest areas during the 1994 breeding season using only a single visit to a previously known nest area. We used detection rates in a probability model to determine how many visits are required to have confidence in reporting absence of goshawks. The purpose of this study is to understand if the three methods for detecting goshawks are robust enough for managers to rely on them for making land management decisions that may impact goshawk nest areas. Blind tests were conducted throughout the western United States. Results were similar among methods with goshawk presence going undetected at 36-42% of the Occupied nest areas after a single visit. These results indicate that a single visit to a nest area is inadequate to provide reliable information on nest area occupation. Our probability of detection model showed that if each detection method is repeated three (historical or tree transect) or four (broadcast) Limes, goshawk absence can be inferred with a high level of confidence. Conclusions regarding nest area Occupation using a single visit sampling method should be made with utmost caution. Classifying a nest area as vacant, when in fact goshawks are present, is a serious concern and leads to spurious Conclusions. Land managers making habitat-altering decisions should not rely on a single visit to nest areas to establish the absence of goshawks. Possibilities for improving the detection of nesting goshawks include Multiple independent visits using the same method, using a sequence of techniques in combination to yield an improved Cumulative probability of detection, or developing a new method yielding a higher probability of detection. The historical nest search obtained the best results, followed by the tree transect and broadcast search.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Boyce, Douglas A.
Kennedy, Patricia L.
Beier, Paul
Ingraldi, Michael F.
MacVean, Susie R.
Siders, Melissa S.
Squires, John R.
Woodbridge, Brian
author_facet Boyce, Douglas A.
Kennedy, Patricia L.
Beier, Paul
Ingraldi, Michael F.
MacVean, Susie R.
Siders, Melissa S.
Squires, John R.
Woodbridge, Brian
author_sort Boyce, Douglas A.
title When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?
title_short When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?
title_full When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?
title_fullStr When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?
title_full_unstemmed When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?
title_sort when are goshawks not there? is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas?
publishDate 2005
url http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/
http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/7/Boyce_etal_2005_goshawk_surveys.pdf
http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/publications/journal-of-raptor-research
genre Accipiter gentilis
Northern Goshawk
genre_facet Accipiter gentilis
Northern Goshawk
op_relation http://openknowledge.nau.edu/982/7/Boyce_etal_2005_goshawk_surveys.pdf
Boyce, Douglas A. and Kennedy, Patricia L. and Beier, Paul and Ingraldi, Michael F. and MacVean, Susie R. and Siders, Melissa S. and Squires, John R. and Woodbridge, Brian (2005) When are goshawks not there? Is a single visit enough to infer absence at occupied nest areas? Journal of Raptor Research, 39 (3). pp. 296-302. ISSN 0892-1016
_version_ 1766261739904565248