Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea?

Projected future changes in primary production in the Barents Sea vary among different regional biogeochemical models, with some showing an increase, some a decrease, and some no change. This variability has been attributed to differences in the underlying physics, but little effort has been spent t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Sea Research
Main Authors: Mousing, Erik Askov, Ellingsen, Ingrid Helene, Hjøllo, Solfrid Sætre, Husson, Berengere, Skogen, Morten D., Wallhead, Philip
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102366
id ftnorskinstvf:oai:niva.brage.unit.no:11250/3091115
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnorskinstvf:oai:niva.brage.unit.no:11250/3091115 2023-10-25T01:35:56+02:00 Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea? Mousing, Erik Askov Ellingsen, Ingrid Helene Hjøllo, Solfrid Sætre Husson, Berengere Skogen, Morten D. Wallhead, Philip 2023 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102366 eng eng Elsevier The EEA and Norway Grants Fund for Regional Cooperation: RO-NO-2019-0520 Framsenteret: Ocean Acidification Flagship Sigma2: ns9630k Sigma2: nn2967k Journal of Sea Research. 2023, 192, 102366. urn:issn:1385-1101 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102366 cristin:2134698 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no © 2023 The Authors 7 192 Journal of Sea Research 102366 Peer reviewed Journal article 2023 ftnorskinstvf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102366 2023-09-27T22:46:48Z Projected future changes in primary production in the Barents Sea vary among different regional biogeochemical models, with some showing an increase, some a decrease, and some no change. This variability has been attributed to differences in the underlying physics, but little effort has been spent to understand the primary causal processes. In this study, we compare two extreme projections: one model (NORWECOM.E2E) projects a 36% increase and another model (SINMOD) projects a 9% decrease in primary production in a future warmer Barents Sea. Using structural equation modeling, we identify the direct and indirect effects of the major environmental variables on primary production. The results show that the two biogeochemical models agree on the directions of impacts, and that differences in the physical environment, specifically the factors controlling nutrient availability, are the main cause of the disparities. Both models agree that decreasing ice-coverage leads to increased primary production. However, the projection with a decrease in primary production was characterized by a decrease in winter nitrate concentrations and stronger temperature-induced stratification. By contrast, the projection with an increase in primary production was characterized by an increase in winter nitrate concentrations and weaker stratification due to a relatively smaller temperature increase which was offset by increasing wind stress. The results emphasize the need for accurate descriptions of the physical environments and inform discussions about the future of the Barents Sea ecosystem and the potential for Arctic blue growth. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Barents Sea Norwegian Institute for Water research: NIVA Open Access Archive (Brage) Arctic Barents Sea Journal of Sea Research 192 102366
institution Open Polar
collection Norwegian Institute for Water research: NIVA Open Access Archive (Brage)
op_collection_id ftnorskinstvf
language English
description Projected future changes in primary production in the Barents Sea vary among different regional biogeochemical models, with some showing an increase, some a decrease, and some no change. This variability has been attributed to differences in the underlying physics, but little effort has been spent to understand the primary causal processes. In this study, we compare two extreme projections: one model (NORWECOM.E2E) projects a 36% increase and another model (SINMOD) projects a 9% decrease in primary production in a future warmer Barents Sea. Using structural equation modeling, we identify the direct and indirect effects of the major environmental variables on primary production. The results show that the two biogeochemical models agree on the directions of impacts, and that differences in the physical environment, specifically the factors controlling nutrient availability, are the main cause of the disparities. Both models agree that decreasing ice-coverage leads to increased primary production. However, the projection with a decrease in primary production was characterized by a decrease in winter nitrate concentrations and stronger temperature-induced stratification. By contrast, the projection with an increase in primary production was characterized by an increase in winter nitrate concentrations and weaker stratification due to a relatively smaller temperature increase which was offset by increasing wind stress. The results emphasize the need for accurate descriptions of the physical environments and inform discussions about the future of the Barents Sea ecosystem and the potential for Arctic blue growth. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mousing, Erik Askov
Ellingsen, Ingrid Helene
Hjøllo, Solfrid Sætre
Husson, Berengere
Skogen, Morten D.
Wallhead, Philip
spellingShingle Mousing, Erik Askov
Ellingsen, Ingrid Helene
Hjøllo, Solfrid Sætre
Husson, Berengere
Skogen, Morten D.
Wallhead, Philip
Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea?
author_facet Mousing, Erik Askov
Ellingsen, Ingrid Helene
Hjøllo, Solfrid Sætre
Husson, Berengere
Skogen, Morten D.
Wallhead, Philip
author_sort Mousing, Erik Askov
title Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea?
title_short Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea?
title_full Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea?
title_fullStr Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea?
title_full_unstemmed Why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the Barents Sea?
title_sort why do regional biogeochemical models produce contrasting future projections of primary production in the barents sea?
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102366
geographic Arctic
Barents Sea
geographic_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
genre Arctic
Barents Sea
genre_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
op_source 7
192
Journal of Sea Research
102366
op_relation The EEA and Norway Grants Fund for Regional Cooperation: RO-NO-2019-0520
Framsenteret: Ocean Acidification Flagship
Sigma2: ns9630k
Sigma2: nn2967k
Journal of Sea Research. 2023, 192, 102366.
urn:issn:1385-1101
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102366
cristin:2134698
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
© 2023 The Authors
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2023.102366
container_title Journal of Sea Research
container_volume 192
container_start_page 102366
_version_ 1780730948700078080