When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod

Many fish stocks are controlled by fish quotas divided among individual firms. Such quota regimes need an enforcement mechanism in order to be effective. Whether or not quota management regimes are worth while depends on whether the rents generated by such regimes cover their costs. Cost-efficient q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hannesson, Rögnvaldur
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: SNF 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/166054
id ftnorgehandelshs:oai:openaccess.nhh.no:11250/166054
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnorgehandelshs:oai:openaccess.nhh.no:11250/166054 2023-05-15T14:30:22+02:00 When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod Hannesson, Rögnvaldur 2008-09 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11250/166054 eng eng SNF Working paper 2008:27 urn:issn:1503-2140 http://hdl.handle.net/11250/166054 VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920 Working paper 2008 ftnorgehandelshs 2021-10-19T20:05:58Z Many fish stocks are controlled by fish quotas divided among individual firms. Such quota regimes need an enforcement mechanism in order to be effective. Whether or not quota management regimes are worth while depends on whether the rents generated by such regimes cover their costs. Cost-efficient quota regimes would attain an optimal deterrence through minimal control and high fines, but in practice there are likely to be socially-determined limits on how high fines could be set. For shared stocks, the optimal degree of enforcement in one country depends critically on the degree of enforcement achieved by the other countries involved. We analyze these questions for the Northeast Arctic cod stock, using data on enforcement of Norwegian fish quotas. Report Arctic cod Arctic Northeast Arctic cod NHH Brage Open institutional repository (Norwegian School of Economics) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection NHH Brage Open institutional repository (Norwegian School of Economics)
op_collection_id ftnorgehandelshs
language English
topic VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920
spellingShingle VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920
Hannesson, Rögnvaldur
When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod
topic_facet VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Fiskerifag: 920
description Many fish stocks are controlled by fish quotas divided among individual firms. Such quota regimes need an enforcement mechanism in order to be effective. Whether or not quota management regimes are worth while depends on whether the rents generated by such regimes cover their costs. Cost-efficient quota regimes would attain an optimal deterrence through minimal control and high fines, but in practice there are likely to be socially-determined limits on how high fines could be set. For shared stocks, the optimal degree of enforcement in one country depends critically on the degree of enforcement achieved by the other countries involved. We analyze these questions for the Northeast Arctic cod stock, using data on enforcement of Norwegian fish quotas.
format Report
author Hannesson, Rögnvaldur
author_facet Hannesson, Rögnvaldur
author_sort Hannesson, Rögnvaldur
title When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod
title_short When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod
title_full When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod
title_fullStr When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod
title_full_unstemmed When is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the Northeast Arctic cod
title_sort when is fish quota enforcement worth while? : a study of the northeast arctic cod
publisher SNF
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/166054
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic cod
Arctic
Northeast Arctic cod
genre_facet Arctic cod
Arctic
Northeast Arctic cod
op_relation Working paper
2008:27
urn:issn:1503-2140
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/166054
_version_ 1766304216704352256