Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries

Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies
Main Authors: Nordgård-Hansen, Ellen Marie, Fjellså, Ingvild Firman, Medgyes, Tamás, Guðmundsdóttir, María, Pétursson, Baldur, Miecznik, Maciej, Pająk, Leszek, Halás, Oto, Leknes, Einar, Midttømme, Kirsti
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091237
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465
id ftnorce:oai:norceresearch.brage.unit.no:11250/3091237
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnorce:oai:norceresearch.brage.unit.no:11250/3091237 2023-10-25T01:39:44+02:00 Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries Nordgård-Hansen, Ellen Marie Fjellså, Ingvild Firman Medgyes, Tamás Guðmundsdóttir, María Pétursson, Baldur Miecznik, Maciej Pająk, Leszek Halás, Oto Leknes, Einar Midttømme, Kirsti 2023 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091237 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 eng eng The EEA and Norway Grants Fund for Regional Cooperation: 2018-1-0502 Energies. 2023, 16 . urn:issn:1996-1073 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091237 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 cristin:2173251 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no © 2023 by the authors Energies 16 30 Peer reviewed Journal article 2023 ftnorce https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465 2023-09-27T22:49:50Z Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differences directly related to geothermal energy, the topic that is investigated in this study. The present work proposes using the societal embeddedness level (SEL) method to analyze and compare the status of non-technical factors affecting geothermal energy use in Hungary, Iceland, Norway, Poland, and Slovakia. The method considers four dimensions: environment, stakeholder involvement, policy and regulations, and markets and financial resources. Only Iceland fully covers the four dimensions by reaching all the milestones in the SEL framework. Iceland has the advantage of a long history of active use of geothermal energy for domestic use. The other countries face challenges within several of the dimensions, while the form and cause of these challenges are specific to each country. The findings illustrate that to mitigate climate change and drive the energy transition forward, both technical and societal factors related to various renewable energy sources must be assessed. Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre) Norway Energies 16 18 6465
institution Open Polar
collection NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre)
op_collection_id ftnorce
language English
description Geothermal energy has emerged as an alternative heating source that can replace fossil energy. This mature technology is already in use all over Europe, but there are significant differences in its use between European countries. One possible explanation for this phenomenon concerns societal differences directly related to geothermal energy, the topic that is investigated in this study. The present work proposes using the societal embeddedness level (SEL) method to analyze and compare the status of non-technical factors affecting geothermal energy use in Hungary, Iceland, Norway, Poland, and Slovakia. The method considers four dimensions: environment, stakeholder involvement, policy and regulations, and markets and financial resources. Only Iceland fully covers the four dimensions by reaching all the milestones in the SEL framework. Iceland has the advantage of a long history of active use of geothermal energy for domestic use. The other countries face challenges within several of the dimensions, while the form and cause of these challenges are specific to each country. The findings illustrate that to mitigate climate change and drive the energy transition forward, both technical and societal factors related to various renewable energy sources must be assessed. Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nordgård-Hansen, Ellen Marie
Fjellså, Ingvild Firman
Medgyes, Tamás
Guðmundsdóttir, María
Pétursson, Baldur
Miecznik, Maciej
Pająk, Leszek
Halás, Oto
Leknes, Einar
Midttømme, Kirsti
spellingShingle Nordgård-Hansen, Ellen Marie
Fjellså, Ingvild Firman
Medgyes, Tamás
Guðmundsdóttir, María
Pétursson, Baldur
Miecznik, Maciej
Pająk, Leszek
Halás, Oto
Leknes, Einar
Midttømme, Kirsti
Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
author_facet Nordgård-Hansen, Ellen Marie
Fjellså, Ingvild Firman
Medgyes, Tamás
Guðmundsdóttir, María
Pétursson, Baldur
Miecznik, Maciej
Pająk, Leszek
Halás, Oto
Leknes, Einar
Midttømme, Kirsti
author_sort Nordgård-Hansen, Ellen Marie
title Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_short Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_full Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_fullStr Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries
title_sort differences in direct geothermal energy utilization for heating and cooling in central and northern european countries
publishDate 2023
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091237
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Energies
16
30
op_relation The EEA and Norway Grants Fund for Regional Cooperation: 2018-1-0502
Energies. 2023, 16 .
urn:issn:1996-1073
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3091237
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465
cristin:2173251
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
© 2023 by the authors
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186465
container_title Energies
container_volume 16
container_issue 18
container_start_page 6465
_version_ 1780735197179805696