The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS

The effect of photoperiod manipulation on growth, smoltification and maturation was assessed in Atlantic salmon through an observational study performed in a commercial RAS facility from June (25.0 ± 11.0 g) to October 2018 (151.1 ± 25.5 g). Half of the commercial cohort 721 was raised in continuous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquaculture Research
Main Authors: Pino, Enrique, Balseiro Vigo, Pablo, Pedrosa, Cindy, Haugen, Tilde, Fleming, Mitchell Stewart, Handeland, Sigurd Olav
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2771086
https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107
id ftnorce:oai:norceresearch.brage.unit.no:11250/2771086
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnorce:oai:norceresearch.brage.unit.no:11250/2771086 2023-05-15T15:31:32+02:00 The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS Pino, Enrique Balseiro Vigo, Pablo Pedrosa, Cindy Haugen, Tilde Fleming, Mitchell Stewart Handeland, Sigurd Olav 2021 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2771086 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 eng eng urn:issn:1355-557X https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2771086 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 cristin:1885935 CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2021, The Authors CC-BY Aquaculture Research Peer reviewed Journal article 2021 ftnorce https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107 2022-10-13T05:50:48Z The effect of photoperiod manipulation on growth, smoltification and maturation was assessed in Atlantic salmon through an observational study performed in a commercial RAS facility from June (25.0 ± 11.0 g) to October 2018 (151.1 ± 25.5 g). Half of the commercial cohort 721 was raised in continuous light LD24:0 (LL) while the other received a 6-week LD12:12 winter signal (WS) for smoltification from 12 August to 21 September. Parameters related to growth (body weight, gene expression of pituitary gh1 and gh2, and liver ghr1, igf1 and igfbp1a), smoltification (condition factor, plasma sodium and cortisol, gill NKA activity and nka1a, nka1b and nkcc1a expression) and maturation (GSI and pituitary fshb and lhb expression) were analysed. Afterwards, a multivariate analysis was performed on production data from five commercial cohorts raised in the facility (including 721) to identify variables potentially linked to early maturation in RAS. Results from the observational study indicated weak compensatory growth and slightly better smoltification in WS, although signs of size-induced smoltification were present in LL. Smoltification indicators were poor in both treatments, suggesting that smolts may not be yet ready for seawater. No maturation was observed in any photoperiod treatment; however, the multivariate assessment suggested that such lack of maturation might be rather linked to the low mean temperature and SGR experienced by our cohort. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre) Aquaculture Research 52 6 2593 2608
institution Open Polar
collection NORCE vitenarkiv (Norwegian Research Centre)
op_collection_id ftnorce
language English
description The effect of photoperiod manipulation on growth, smoltification and maturation was assessed in Atlantic salmon through an observational study performed in a commercial RAS facility from June (25.0 ± 11.0 g) to October 2018 (151.1 ± 25.5 g). Half of the commercial cohort 721 was raised in continuous light LD24:0 (LL) while the other received a 6-week LD12:12 winter signal (WS) for smoltification from 12 August to 21 September. Parameters related to growth (body weight, gene expression of pituitary gh1 and gh2, and liver ghr1, igf1 and igfbp1a), smoltification (condition factor, plasma sodium and cortisol, gill NKA activity and nka1a, nka1b and nkcc1a expression) and maturation (GSI and pituitary fshb and lhb expression) were analysed. Afterwards, a multivariate analysis was performed on production data from five commercial cohorts raised in the facility (including 721) to identify variables potentially linked to early maturation in RAS. Results from the observational study indicated weak compensatory growth and slightly better smoltification in WS, although signs of size-induced smoltification were present in LL. Smoltification indicators were poor in both treatments, suggesting that smolts may not be yet ready for seawater. No maturation was observed in any photoperiod treatment; however, the multivariate assessment suggested that such lack of maturation might be rather linked to the low mean temperature and SGR experienced by our cohort. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pino, Enrique
Balseiro Vigo, Pablo
Pedrosa, Cindy
Haugen, Tilde
Fleming, Mitchell Stewart
Handeland, Sigurd Olav
spellingShingle Pino, Enrique
Balseiro Vigo, Pablo
Pedrosa, Cindy
Haugen, Tilde
Fleming, Mitchell Stewart
Handeland, Sigurd Olav
The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS
author_facet Pino, Enrique
Balseiro Vigo, Pablo
Pedrosa, Cindy
Haugen, Tilde
Fleming, Mitchell Stewart
Handeland, Sigurd Olav
author_sort Pino, Enrique
title The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS
title_short The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS
title_full The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS
title_fullStr The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS
title_full_unstemmed The effect of photoperiod manipulation on Atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: A case study of a commercial RAS
title_sort effect of photoperiod manipulation on atlantic salmon growth, smoltification and sexual maturation: a case study of a commercial ras
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2771086
https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107
genre Atlantic salmon
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
op_source Aquaculture Research
op_relation urn:issn:1355-557X
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2771086
https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107
cristin:1885935
op_rights CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© 2021, The Authors
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15107
container_title Aquaculture Research
container_volume 52
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2593
op_container_end_page 2608
_version_ 1766362052975132672