Surface networks in the Arctic may miss a future methane bomb

The Arctic is warming up to 4 times faster than the global average, leading to significant environmental changes. Given the sensitivity of natural methane (CH4) sources to environmental conditions, increasing Arctic temperatures are expected to lead to higher CH4 emissions, particularly due to perma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Wittig, Sophie, Berchet, Antoine, Pison, Isabelle, Saunois, Marielle, Paris, Jean-Daniel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6359-2024
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00073931
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00072064/acp-24-6359-2024.pdf
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/6359/2024/acp-24-6359-2024.pdf
Description
Summary:The Arctic is warming up to 4 times faster than the global average, leading to significant environmental changes. Given the sensitivity of natural methane (CH4) sources to environmental conditions, increasing Arctic temperatures are expected to lead to higher CH4 emissions, particularly due to permafrost thaw and the exposure of organic matter. Some estimates therefore assume the existence of an Arctic methane bomb, where vast CH4 quantities are suddenly and rapidly released over several years. This study examines the ability of the in situ observation network to detect such events in the Arctic, a generally poorly constrained region. Using the FLEXPART (FLEXible PARTicle) atmospheric transport model and varying CH4 emission scenarios, we found that areas with a dense observation network could detect a methane bomb occurring within 2 to 10 years. In contrast, regions with sparse coverage would need 10 to 30 years, with potential false positives in other areas.