GREP reanalysis captures the evolution of the Arctic Marginal Ice Zone across timescales

• Main Authors: Cocetta, Francesco, Zampieri, Lorenzo, Selivanova, Julia, Iovino, Doroteaciro
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2024
• Subjects: article; Verlagsveröffentlichung; Arctic; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-413; https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00071862; https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00070110/egusphere-2024-413.pdf; https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-413/egusphere-2024-413.pdf

The recent development of data-assimilative reanalyses of the global ocean and sea ice enables a better understanding of the polar region dynamics and provides gridded descriptions of sea ice variables without temporal and spatial gaps. Here, we study the spatiotemporal variability of the Arctic sea ice area and thickness using the Global ocean Reanalysis Ensemble Product (GREP) produced and disseminated by the Copernicus Marine Service (CMS). GREP is compared and validated against the state-of-the-art regional reanalyses PIOMAS and TOPAZ, and observational datasets of sea ice concentration and thickness for the period 1993–2020. Our analysis presents pan-Arctic metrics but also emphasizes the different responses of ice classes, marginal ice zone (MIZ) and pack ice, to climate changes. This aspect is of primary importance since the MIZ has been widening and making up an increasing percentage of the summer sea ice as a consequence of the Arctic warming and sea ice extent retreat. Our results show that the GREP ensemble provides reliable estimates of present-day and recent past Arctic sea ice states and that the seasonal to interannual variability and linear trends in the MIZ area are properly reproduced, with ensemble spread often being as broad as the uncertainty of the observational dataset. The analysis is complemented by an assessment of the average MIZ latitude and its northward migration in recent years, a further indicator of the Arctic sea ice decline. There is substantial agreement between GREP and reference datasets in the summer. Overall, the GREP ensemble mean is an adequate tool for gaining an improved understanding of the Arctic sea ice, also in light of the expected warming and the Arctic transitions to ice-free summers.