Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models

The simulated Northern Hemisphere winter stationary wave (SW) field is investigated in 11 Subseasonal-to-Seasonal (S2S) prediction project models. It is shown that while most models considered can well simulate the stationary wavenumbers 1 and 2 during the first 2 weeks of integration, they diverge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weather and Climate Dynamics
Main Authors: Schwartz, Chen, Garfinkel, Chaim I., Yadav, Priyanka, Chen, Wen, Domeisen, Daniela I. V.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00061612
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00061048/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf
https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/3/679/2022/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf
_version_ 1821650842710704128
author Schwartz, Chen
Garfinkel, Chaim I.
Yadav, Priyanka
Chen, Wen
Domeisen, Daniela I. V.
author_facet Schwartz, Chen
Garfinkel, Chaim I.
Yadav, Priyanka
Chen, Wen
Domeisen, Daniela I. V.
author_sort Schwartz, Chen
collection Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA
container_issue 2
container_start_page 679
container_title Weather and Climate Dynamics
container_volume 3
description The simulated Northern Hemisphere winter stationary wave (SW) field is investigated in 11 Subseasonal-to-Seasonal (S2S) prediction project models. It is shown that while most models considered can well simulate the stationary wavenumbers 1 and 2 during the first 2 weeks of integration, they diverge from observations following week 3. Those models with a poor resolution in the stratosphere struggle to simulate the waves, in both the troposphere and the stratosphere, even during the first 2 weeks. Focusing on the tropospheric regions where SWs peak in amplitude reveals that the models generally do a better job in simulating the northwestern Pacific stationary trough, while certain models struggle to simulate the stationary ridges in both western North America and the North Atlantic. In addition, a strong relationship is found between regional biases in the stationary height field and model errors in simulated upward propagation of planetary waves into the stratosphere. In the stratosphere, biases are mostly in wave 2 in those models with high stratospheric resolution, whereas in those models with low resolution in the stratosphere, a wave 1 bias is evident, which leads to a strong bias in the stratospheric mean zonal circulation due to the predominance of wave 1 there. Finally, biases in both amplitude and location of mean tropical convection and the subsequent subtropical downwelling are identified as possible contributors to biases in the regional SW field in the troposphere.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
id ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00061612
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftnonlinearchiv
op_container_end_page 692
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022
op_relation Weather and Climate Dynamics -- https://www.weather-climate-dynamics.net/ -- 2698-4016
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00061612
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00061048/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf
https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/3/679/2022/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
uneingeschränkt
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
publishDate 2022
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00061612 2025-01-16T23:42:09+00:00 Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models Schwartz, Chen Garfinkel, Chaim I. Yadav, Priyanka Chen, Wen Domeisen, Daniela I. V. 2022-06 electronic https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00061612 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00061048/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/3/679/2022/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf eng eng Copernicus Publications Weather and Climate Dynamics -- https://www.weather-climate-dynamics.net/ -- 2698-4016 https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00061612 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00061048/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/3/679/2022/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY article Verlagsveröffentlichung article Text doc-type:article 2022 ftnonlinearchiv https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022 2022-06-26T23:11:40Z The simulated Northern Hemisphere winter stationary wave (SW) field is investigated in 11 Subseasonal-to-Seasonal (S2S) prediction project models. It is shown that while most models considered can well simulate the stationary wavenumbers 1 and 2 during the first 2 weeks of integration, they diverge from observations following week 3. Those models with a poor resolution in the stratosphere struggle to simulate the waves, in both the troposphere and the stratosphere, even during the first 2 weeks. Focusing on the tropospheric regions where SWs peak in amplitude reveals that the models generally do a better job in simulating the northwestern Pacific stationary trough, while certain models struggle to simulate the stationary ridges in both western North America and the North Atlantic. In addition, a strong relationship is found between regional biases in the stationary height field and model errors in simulated upward propagation of planetary waves into the stratosphere. In the stratosphere, biases are mostly in wave 2 in those models with high stratospheric resolution, whereas in those models with low resolution in the stratosphere, a wave 1 bias is evident, which leads to a strong bias in the stratospheric mean zonal circulation due to the predominance of wave 1 there. Finally, biases in both amplitude and location of mean tropical convection and the subsequent subtropical downwelling are identified as possible contributors to biases in the regional SW field in the troposphere. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA Pacific Weather and Climate Dynamics 3 2 679 692
spellingShingle article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
Schwartz, Chen
Garfinkel, Chaim I.
Yadav, Priyanka
Chen, Wen
Domeisen, Daniela I. V.
Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models
title Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models
title_full Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models
title_fullStr Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models
title_full_unstemmed Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models
title_short Stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models
title_sort stationary wave biases and their effect on upward troposphere– stratosphere coupling in sub-seasonal prediction models
topic article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
topic_facet article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
url https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00061612
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00061048/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf
https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/3/679/2022/wcd-3-679-2022.pdf