Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations
Energetic particle precipitation associated with pulsating aurora (PsA) can reach down to lower mesospheric altitudes and deplete ozone. It is well documented that pulsating aurora is a common phenomenon during substorm recovery phases. This indicates that using magnetic indices to model the chemist...
Published in: | Annales Geophysicae |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00059789 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00059438/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/40/1/2022/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf |
_version_ | 1821501998211530752 |
---|---|
author | Tesema, Fasil Partamies, Noora Whiter, Daniel K. Ogawa, Yasunobu |
author_facet | Tesema, Fasil Partamies, Noora Whiter, Daniel K. Ogawa, Yasunobu |
author_sort | Tesema, Fasil |
collection | Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Annales Geophysicae |
container_volume | 40 |
description | Energetic particle precipitation associated with pulsating aurora (PsA) can reach down to lower mesospheric altitudes and deplete ozone. It is well documented that pulsating aurora is a common phenomenon during substorm recovery phases. This indicates that using magnetic indices to model the chemistry induced by PsA electrons could underestimate the energy deposition in the atmosphere. Integrating satellite measurements of precipitating electrons in models is considered to be an alternative way to account for such an underestimation. One way to do this is to test and validate the existing ion chemistry models using integrated measurements from satellite and ground-based observations. By using satellite measurements, an average or typical spectrum of PsA electrons can be constructed and used as an input in models to study the effects of the energetic electrons in the atmosphere. In this study, we compare electron densities from the EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter scientific radar system) radars with auroral ion chemistry and the energetics model by using pulsating aurora spectra derived from the Polar Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) as an energy input for the model. We found a good agreement between the model and EISCAT electron densities in the region dominated by patchy pulsating aurora. However, the magnitude of the observed electron densities suggests a significant difference in the flux of precipitating electrons for different pulsating aurora types (structures) observed. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | EISCAT |
genre_facet | EISCAT |
id | ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00059789 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftnonlinearchiv |
op_container_end_page | 10 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022 |
op_relation | Annales Geophysicae -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?1458425 -- https://www.ann-geophys.net/ -- https://www.ann-geophys.net/volumes.html -- http://link.springer.com/journal/585 -- 1432-0576 https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00059789 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00059438/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/40/1/2022/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf |
op_rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Copernicus Publications |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00059789 2025-01-16T21:41:58+00:00 Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations Tesema, Fasil Partamies, Noora Whiter, Daniel K. Ogawa, Yasunobu 2022-01 electronic https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00059789 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00059438/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/40/1/2022/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf eng eng Copernicus Publications Annales Geophysicae -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?1458425 -- https://www.ann-geophys.net/ -- https://www.ann-geophys.net/volumes.html -- http://link.springer.com/journal/585 -- 1432-0576 https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00059789 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00059438/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/40/1/2022/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article Verlagsveröffentlichung article Text doc-type:article 2022 ftnonlinearchiv https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022 2024-06-26T04:34:57Z Energetic particle precipitation associated with pulsating aurora (PsA) can reach down to lower mesospheric altitudes and deplete ozone. It is well documented that pulsating aurora is a common phenomenon during substorm recovery phases. This indicates that using magnetic indices to model the chemistry induced by PsA electrons could underestimate the energy deposition in the atmosphere. Integrating satellite measurements of precipitating electrons in models is considered to be an alternative way to account for such an underestimation. One way to do this is to test and validate the existing ion chemistry models using integrated measurements from satellite and ground-based observations. By using satellite measurements, an average or typical spectrum of PsA electrons can be constructed and used as an input in models to study the effects of the energetic electrons in the atmosphere. In this study, we compare electron densities from the EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter scientific radar system) radars with auroral ion chemistry and the energetics model by using pulsating aurora spectra derived from the Polar Operational Environmental Satellite (POES) as an energy input for the model. We found a good agreement between the model and EISCAT electron densities in the region dominated by patchy pulsating aurora. However, the magnitude of the observed electron densities suggests a significant difference in the flux of precipitating electrons for different pulsating aurora types (structures) observed. Article in Journal/Newspaper EISCAT Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA Annales Geophysicae 40 1 1 10 |
spellingShingle | article Verlagsveröffentlichung Tesema, Fasil Partamies, Noora Whiter, Daniel K. Ogawa, Yasunobu Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations |
title | Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations |
title_full | Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations |
title_fullStr | Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations |
title_full_unstemmed | Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations |
title_short | Types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and EISCAT electron density observations |
title_sort | types of pulsating aurora: comparison of model and eiscat electron density observations |
topic | article Verlagsveröffentlichung |
topic_facet | article Verlagsveröffentlichung |
url | https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-1-2022 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00059789 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00059438/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/40/1/2022/angeo-40-1-2022.pdf |