Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set

The concentrations of sulfate, black carbon (BC) and other aerosols in the Arctic are characterized by high values in late winter and spring (so-called Arctic Haze) and low values in summer. Models have long been struggling to capture this seasonality and especially the high concentrations associate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Eckhardt, S., Quennehen, B., Olivié, D. J. L., Berntsen, T. K., Cherian, R., Christensen, J. H., Collins, W., Crepinsek, S., Daskalakis, N., Flanner, M., Herber, A., Heyes, C., Hodnebrog, Ø., Huang, L., Kanakidou, M., Klimont, Z., Langner, J., Law, K. S., Lund, M. T., Mahmood, R., Massling, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Nielsen, I. E., Nøjgaard, J. K., Quaas, J., Quinn, P. K., Raut, J.-C., Rumbold, S. T., Schulz, M., Sharma, S., Skeie, R. B., Skov, H., Uttal, T., von Salzen, K., Stohl, A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00044211
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00043831/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9413/2015/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf
id ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00044211
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA
op_collection_id ftnonlinearchiv
language English
topic article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
spellingShingle article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
Eckhardt, S.
Quennehen, B.
Olivié, D. J. L.
Berntsen, T. K.
Cherian, R.
Christensen, J. H.
Collins, W.
Crepinsek, S.
Daskalakis, N.
Flanner, M.
Herber, A.
Heyes, C.
Hodnebrog, Ø.
Huang, L.
Kanakidou, M.
Klimont, Z.
Langner, J.
Law, K. S.
Lund, M. T.
Mahmood, R.
Massling, A.
Myriokefalitakis, S.
Nielsen, I. E.
Nøjgaard, J. K.
Quaas, J.
Quinn, P. K.
Raut, J.-C.
Rumbold, S. T.
Schulz, M.
Sharma, S.
Skeie, R. B.
Skov, H.
Uttal, T.
von Salzen, K.
Stohl, A.
Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set
topic_facet article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
description The concentrations of sulfate, black carbon (BC) and other aerosols in the Arctic are characterized by high values in late winter and spring (so-called Arctic Haze) and low values in summer. Models have long been struggling to capture this seasonality and especially the high concentrations associated with Arctic Haze. In this study, we evaluate sulfate and BC concentrations from eleven different models driven with the same emission inventory against a comprehensive pan-Arctic measurement data set over a time period of 2 years (2008–2009). The set of models consisted of one Lagrangian particle dispersion model, four chemistry transport models (CTMs), one atmospheric chemistry-weather forecast model and five chemistry climate models (CCMs), of which two were nudged to meteorological analyses and three were running freely. The measurement data set consisted of surface measurements of equivalent BC (eBC) from five stations (Alert, Barrow, Pallas, Tiksi and Zeppelin), elemental carbon (EC) from Station Nord and Alert and aircraft measurements of refractory BC (rBC) from six different campaigns. We find that the models generally captured the measured eBC or rBC and sulfate concentrations quite well, compared to previous comparisons. However, the aerosol seasonality at the surface is still too weak in most models. Concentrations of eBC and sulfate averaged over three surface sites are underestimated in winter/spring in all but one model (model means for January–March underestimated by 59 and 37 % for BC and sulfate, respectively), whereas concentrations in summer are overestimated in the model mean (by 88 and 44 % for July–September), but with overestimates as well as underestimates present in individual models. The most pronounced eBC underestimates, not included in the above multi-site average, are found for the station Tiksi in Siberia where the measured annual mean eBC concentration is 3 times higher than the average annual mean for all other stations. This suggests an underestimate of BC sources in Russia in the emission inventory used. Based on the campaign data, biomass burning was identified as another cause of the modeling problems. For sulfate, very large differences were found in the model ensemble, with an apparent anti-correlation between modeled surface concentrations and total atmospheric columns. There is a strong correlation between observed sulfate and eBC concentrations with consistent sulfate/eBC slopes found for all Arctic stations, indicating that the sources contributing to sulfate and BC are similar throughout the Arctic and that the aerosols are internally mixed and undergo similar removal. However, only three models reproduced this finding, whereas sulfate and BC are weakly correlated in the other models. Overall, no class of models (e.g., CTMs, CCMs) performed better than the others and differences are independent of model resolution.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Eckhardt, S.
Quennehen, B.
Olivié, D. J. L.
Berntsen, T. K.
Cherian, R.
Christensen, J. H.
Collins, W.
Crepinsek, S.
Daskalakis, N.
Flanner, M.
Herber, A.
Heyes, C.
Hodnebrog, Ø.
Huang, L.
Kanakidou, M.
Klimont, Z.
Langner, J.
Law, K. S.
Lund, M. T.
Mahmood, R.
Massling, A.
Myriokefalitakis, S.
Nielsen, I. E.
Nøjgaard, J. K.
Quaas, J.
Quinn, P. K.
Raut, J.-C.
Rumbold, S. T.
Schulz, M.
Sharma, S.
Skeie, R. B.
Skov, H.
Uttal, T.
von Salzen, K.
Stohl, A.
author_facet Eckhardt, S.
Quennehen, B.
Olivié, D. J. L.
Berntsen, T. K.
Cherian, R.
Christensen, J. H.
Collins, W.
Crepinsek, S.
Daskalakis, N.
Flanner, M.
Herber, A.
Heyes, C.
Hodnebrog, Ø.
Huang, L.
Kanakidou, M.
Klimont, Z.
Langner, J.
Law, K. S.
Lund, M. T.
Mahmood, R.
Massling, A.
Myriokefalitakis, S.
Nielsen, I. E.
Nøjgaard, J. K.
Quaas, J.
Quinn, P. K.
Raut, J.-C.
Rumbold, S. T.
Schulz, M.
Sharma, S.
Skeie, R. B.
Skov, H.
Uttal, T.
von Salzen, K.
Stohl, A.
author_sort Eckhardt, S.
title Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set
title_short Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set
title_full Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set
title_fullStr Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set
title_full_unstemmed Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set
title_sort current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00044211
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00043831/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9413/2015/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-16.663,-16.663,81.599,81.599)
ENVELOPE(128.867,128.867,71.633,71.633)
geographic Arctic
Station Nord
Tiksi
geographic_facet Arctic
Station Nord
Tiksi
genre Arctic
black carbon
Tiksi
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
black carbon
Tiksi
Siberia
op_relation Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics -- http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/volumes_and_issues.html -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2069847 -- 1680-7324
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00044211
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00043831/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9413/2015/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf
op_rights uneingeschränkt
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 15
container_issue 16
container_start_page 9413
op_container_end_page 9433
_version_ 1766320886566092800
spelling ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00044211 2023-05-15T14:49:49+02:00 Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set Eckhardt, S. Quennehen, B. Olivié, D. J. L. Berntsen, T. K. Cherian, R. Christensen, J. H. Collins, W. Crepinsek, S. Daskalakis, N. Flanner, M. Herber, A. Heyes, C. Hodnebrog, Ø. Huang, L. Kanakidou, M. Klimont, Z. Langner, J. Law, K. S. Lund, M. T. Mahmood, R. Massling, A. Myriokefalitakis, S. Nielsen, I. E. Nøjgaard, J. K. Quaas, J. Quinn, P. K. Raut, J.-C. Rumbold, S. T. Schulz, M. Sharma, S. Skeie, R. B. Skov, H. Uttal, T. von Salzen, K. Stohl, A. 2015-08 electronic https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00044211 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00043831/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9413/2015/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf eng eng Copernicus Publications Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics -- http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/volumes_and_issues.html -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2069847 -- 1680-7324 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00044211 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00043831/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/15/9413/2015/acp-15-9413-2015.pdf uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article Verlagsveröffentlichung article Text doc-type:article 2015 ftnonlinearchiv https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9413-2015 2022-02-08T22:40:13Z The concentrations of sulfate, black carbon (BC) and other aerosols in the Arctic are characterized by high values in late winter and spring (so-called Arctic Haze) and low values in summer. Models have long been struggling to capture this seasonality and especially the high concentrations associated with Arctic Haze. In this study, we evaluate sulfate and BC concentrations from eleven different models driven with the same emission inventory against a comprehensive pan-Arctic measurement data set over a time period of 2 years (2008–2009). The set of models consisted of one Lagrangian particle dispersion model, four chemistry transport models (CTMs), one atmospheric chemistry-weather forecast model and five chemistry climate models (CCMs), of which two were nudged to meteorological analyses and three were running freely. The measurement data set consisted of surface measurements of equivalent BC (eBC) from five stations (Alert, Barrow, Pallas, Tiksi and Zeppelin), elemental carbon (EC) from Station Nord and Alert and aircraft measurements of refractory BC (rBC) from six different campaigns. We find that the models generally captured the measured eBC or rBC and sulfate concentrations quite well, compared to previous comparisons. However, the aerosol seasonality at the surface is still too weak in most models. Concentrations of eBC and sulfate averaged over three surface sites are underestimated in winter/spring in all but one model (model means for January–March underestimated by 59 and 37 % for BC and sulfate, respectively), whereas concentrations in summer are overestimated in the model mean (by 88 and 44 % for July–September), but with overestimates as well as underestimates present in individual models. The most pronounced eBC underestimates, not included in the above multi-site average, are found for the station Tiksi in Siberia where the measured annual mean eBC concentration is 3 times higher than the average annual mean for all other stations. This suggests an underestimate of BC sources in Russia in the emission inventory used. Based on the campaign data, biomass burning was identified as another cause of the modeling problems. For sulfate, very large differences were found in the model ensemble, with an apparent anti-correlation between modeled surface concentrations and total atmospheric columns. There is a strong correlation between observed sulfate and eBC concentrations with consistent sulfate/eBC slopes found for all Arctic stations, indicating that the sources contributing to sulfate and BC are similar throughout the Arctic and that the aerosols are internally mixed and undergo similar removal. However, only three models reproduced this finding, whereas sulfate and BC are weakly correlated in the other models. Overall, no class of models (e.g., CTMs, CCMs) performed better than the others and differences are independent of model resolution. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic black carbon Tiksi Siberia Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA Arctic Station Nord ENVELOPE(-16.663,-16.663,81.599,81.599) Tiksi ENVELOPE(128.867,128.867,71.633,71.633) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15 16 9413 9433