Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering

We examine extreme temperature and precipitation under two potential geoengineering methods forming part of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). The solar dimming experiment G1 is designed to completely offset the global mean radiative forcing due to a CO2-quadrupling experimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Ji, Duoying, Fang, Songsong, Curry, Charles L., Kashimura, Hiroki, Watanabe, Shingo, Cole, Jason N. S., Lenton, Andrew, Muri, Helene, Kravitz, Ben, Moore, John C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00041621
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00041241/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10133/2018/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf
id ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00041621
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00041621 2023-05-15T18:18:54+02:00 Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering Ji, Duoying Fang, Songsong Curry, Charles L. Kashimura, Hiroki Watanabe, Shingo Cole, Jason N. S. Lenton, Andrew Muri, Helene Kravitz, Ben Moore, John C. 2018-07 electronic https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00041621 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00041241/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10133/2018/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf eng eng Copernicus Publications Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics -- http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/volumes_and_issues.html -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2069847 -- 1680-7324 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00041621 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00041241/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10133/2018/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY article Verlagsveröffentlichung article Text doc-type:article 2018 ftnonlinearchiv https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018 2022-02-08T22:41:29Z We examine extreme temperature and precipitation under two potential geoengineering methods forming part of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). The solar dimming experiment G1 is designed to completely offset the global mean radiative forcing due to a CO2-quadrupling experiment (abrupt4 × CO2), while in GeoMIP experiment G4, the radiative forcing due to the representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) scenario is partly offset by a simulated layer of aerosols in the stratosphere. Both G1 and G4 geoengineering simulations lead to lower minimum temperatures (TNn) at higher latitudes and on land, primarily through feedback effects involving high-latitude processes such as snow cover, sea ice and soil moisture. There is larger cooling of TNn and maximum temperatures (TXx) over land compared with oceans, and the land–sea cooling contrast is larger for TXx than TNn. Maximum 5-day precipitation (Rx5day) increases over subtropical oceans, whereas warm spells (WSDI) decrease markedly in the tropics, and the number of consecutive dry days (CDDs) decreases in most deserts. The precipitation during the tropical cyclone (hurricane) seasons becomes less intense, whilst the remainder of the year becomes wetter. Stratospheric aerosol injection is more effective than solar dimming in moderating extreme precipitation (and flooding). Despite the magnitude of the radiative forcing applied in G1 being ∼ 7.7 times larger than in G4 and despite differences in the aerosol chemistry and transport schemes amongst the models, the two types of geoengineering show similar spatial patterns in normalized differences in extreme temperatures changes. Large differences mainly occur at northern high latitudes, where stratospheric aerosol injection more effectively reduces TNn and TXx. While the pattern of normalized differences in extreme precipitation is more complex than that of extreme temperatures, generally stratospheric aerosol injection is more effective in reducing tropical Rx5day, while solar dimming is more effective over extra-tropical regions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18 14 10133 10156
institution Open Polar
collection Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA
op_collection_id ftnonlinearchiv
language English
topic article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
spellingShingle article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
Ji, Duoying
Fang, Songsong
Curry, Charles L.
Kashimura, Hiroki
Watanabe, Shingo
Cole, Jason N. S.
Lenton, Andrew
Muri, Helene
Kravitz, Ben
Moore, John C.
Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
topic_facet article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
description We examine extreme temperature and precipitation under two potential geoengineering methods forming part of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). The solar dimming experiment G1 is designed to completely offset the global mean radiative forcing due to a CO2-quadrupling experiment (abrupt4 × CO2), while in GeoMIP experiment G4, the radiative forcing due to the representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) scenario is partly offset by a simulated layer of aerosols in the stratosphere. Both G1 and G4 geoengineering simulations lead to lower minimum temperatures (TNn) at higher latitudes and on land, primarily through feedback effects involving high-latitude processes such as snow cover, sea ice and soil moisture. There is larger cooling of TNn and maximum temperatures (TXx) over land compared with oceans, and the land–sea cooling contrast is larger for TXx than TNn. Maximum 5-day precipitation (Rx5day) increases over subtropical oceans, whereas warm spells (WSDI) decrease markedly in the tropics, and the number of consecutive dry days (CDDs) decreases in most deserts. The precipitation during the tropical cyclone (hurricane) seasons becomes less intense, whilst the remainder of the year becomes wetter. Stratospheric aerosol injection is more effective than solar dimming in moderating extreme precipitation (and flooding). Despite the magnitude of the radiative forcing applied in G1 being ∼ 7.7 times larger than in G4 and despite differences in the aerosol chemistry and transport schemes amongst the models, the two types of geoengineering show similar spatial patterns in normalized differences in extreme temperatures changes. Large differences mainly occur at northern high latitudes, where stratospheric aerosol injection more effectively reduces TNn and TXx. While the pattern of normalized differences in extreme precipitation is more complex than that of extreme temperatures, generally stratospheric aerosol injection is more effective in reducing tropical Rx5day, while solar dimming is more effective over extra-tropical regions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ji, Duoying
Fang, Songsong
Curry, Charles L.
Kashimura, Hiroki
Watanabe, Shingo
Cole, Jason N. S.
Lenton, Andrew
Muri, Helene
Kravitz, Ben
Moore, John C.
author_facet Ji, Duoying
Fang, Songsong
Curry, Charles L.
Kashimura, Hiroki
Watanabe, Shingo
Cole, Jason N. S.
Lenton, Andrew
Muri, Helene
Kravitz, Ben
Moore, John C.
author_sort Ji, Duoying
title Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
title_short Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
title_full Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
title_fullStr Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
title_full_unstemmed Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
title_sort extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00041621
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00041241/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10133/2018/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_relation Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics -- http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/volumes_and_issues.html -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2069847 -- 1680-7324
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00041621
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00041241/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/18/10133/2018/acp-18-10133-2018.pdf
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
uneingeschränkt
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 18
container_issue 14
container_start_page 10133
op_container_end_page 10156
_version_ 1766195647292112896