Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis

Concerning their sensitivity to ocean acidification, coccolithophores, a group of calcifying single-celled phytoplankton, are one of the best-studied groups of marine organisms. However, in spite of the large number of studies investigating coccolithophore physiological responses to ocean acidificat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences
Main Authors: Meyer, J., Riebesell, U.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1671-2015
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00017168
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00017123/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf
https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/1671/2015/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf
id ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00017168
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00017168 2023-05-15T17:49:37+02:00 Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis Meyer, J. Riebesell, U. 2015-03 electronic https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1671-2015 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00017168 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00017123/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/1671/2015/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf eng eng Copernicus Publications Biogeosciences -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2158181 -- http://www.copernicus.org/EGU/bg/bg.html -- 1726-4189 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1671-2015 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00017168 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00017123/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/1671/2015/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article Verlagsveröffentlichung article Text doc-type:article 2015 ftnonlinearchiv https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1671-2015 2022-02-08T22:53:50Z Concerning their sensitivity to ocean acidification, coccolithophores, a group of calcifying single-celled phytoplankton, are one of the best-studied groups of marine organisms. However, in spite of the large number of studies investigating coccolithophore physiological responses to ocean acidification, uncertainties still remain due to variable and partly contradictory results. In the present study we have used all existing data in a meta-analysis to estimate the effect size of future pCO2 changes on the rates of calcification and photosynthesis and the ratio of particulate inorganic to organic carbon (PIC / POC) in different coccolithophore species. Our results indicate that ocean acidification has a negative effect on calcification and the cellular PIC / POC ratio in the two most abundant coccolithophore species: Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica. In contrast, the more heavily calcified species Coccolithus braarudii did not show a distinct response when exposed to elevated pCO2/reduced pH. Photosynthesis in Gephyrocapsa oceanica was positively affected by high CO2, while no effect was observed for the other coccolithophore species. There was no indication that the method of carbonate chemistry manipulation was responsible for the inconsistent results regarding observed responses in calcification and the PIC / POC ratio. The perturbation method, however, appears to affect photosynthesis, as responses varied significantly between total alkalinity (TA) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) manipulations. These results emphasize that coccolithophore species respond differently to ocean acidification, both in terms of calcification and photosynthesis. Where negative effects occur, they become evident at CO2 levels in the range projected for this century in the case of unabated CO2 emissions. As the data sets used in this meta-analysis do not account for adaptive responses, ecological fitness and ecosystem interactions, the question remains as to how these physiological responses play out in the natural environment. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA Biogeosciences 12 6 1671 1682
institution Open Polar
collection Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA
op_collection_id ftnonlinearchiv
language English
topic article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
spellingShingle article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
Meyer, J.
Riebesell, U.
Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis
topic_facet article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
description Concerning their sensitivity to ocean acidification, coccolithophores, a group of calcifying single-celled phytoplankton, are one of the best-studied groups of marine organisms. However, in spite of the large number of studies investigating coccolithophore physiological responses to ocean acidification, uncertainties still remain due to variable and partly contradictory results. In the present study we have used all existing data in a meta-analysis to estimate the effect size of future pCO2 changes on the rates of calcification and photosynthesis and the ratio of particulate inorganic to organic carbon (PIC / POC) in different coccolithophore species. Our results indicate that ocean acidification has a negative effect on calcification and the cellular PIC / POC ratio in the two most abundant coccolithophore species: Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica. In contrast, the more heavily calcified species Coccolithus braarudii did not show a distinct response when exposed to elevated pCO2/reduced pH. Photosynthesis in Gephyrocapsa oceanica was positively affected by high CO2, while no effect was observed for the other coccolithophore species. There was no indication that the method of carbonate chemistry manipulation was responsible for the inconsistent results regarding observed responses in calcification and the PIC / POC ratio. The perturbation method, however, appears to affect photosynthesis, as responses varied significantly between total alkalinity (TA) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) manipulations. These results emphasize that coccolithophore species respond differently to ocean acidification, both in terms of calcification and photosynthesis. Where negative effects occur, they become evident at CO2 levels in the range projected for this century in the case of unabated CO2 emissions. As the data sets used in this meta-analysis do not account for adaptive responses, ecological fitness and ecosystem interactions, the question remains as to how these physiological responses play out in the natural environment.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Meyer, J.
Riebesell, U.
author_facet Meyer, J.
Riebesell, U.
author_sort Meyer, J.
title Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis
title_short Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis
title_full Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reviews and Syntheses: Responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis
title_sort reviews and syntheses: responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1671-2015
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00017168
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00017123/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf
https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/1671/2015/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation Biogeosciences -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2158181 -- http://www.copernicus.org/EGU/bg/bg.html -- 1726-4189
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1671-2015
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00017168
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00017123/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf
https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/1671/2015/bg-12-1671-2015.pdf
op_rights uneingeschränkt
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1671-2015
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 12
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1671
op_container_end_page 1682
_version_ 1766156007868727296