Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements

This study presents a comparison between the retrieval of optical properties of aerosol above clouds (AAC) from different techniques developed for the A-Train sensors CALIOP/CALIPSO and POLDER/PARASOL. The main objective is to analyse the consistency between the results derived from the active and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Main Authors: Deaconu, Lucia T., Waquet, Fabien, Josset, Damien, Ferlay, Nicolas, Peers, Fanny, Thieuleux, François, Ducos, Fabrice, Pascal, Nicolas, Tanré, Didier, Pelon, Jacques, Goloub, Philippe
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00008645
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00008602/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf
https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/3499/2017/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf
id ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00008645
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA
op_collection_id ftnonlinearchiv
language English
topic article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
spellingShingle article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
Deaconu, Lucia T.
Waquet, Fabien
Josset, Damien
Ferlay, Nicolas
Peers, Fanny
Thieuleux, François
Ducos, Fabrice
Pascal, Nicolas
Tanré, Didier
Pelon, Jacques
Goloub, Philippe
Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements
topic_facet article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
description This study presents a comparison between the retrieval of optical properties of aerosol above clouds (AAC) from different techniques developed for the A-Train sensors CALIOP/CALIPSO and POLDER/PARASOL. The main objective is to analyse the consistency between the results derived from the active and the passive measurements. We compare the aerosol optical thickness (AOT) above optically thick clouds (cloud optical thickness (COT) larger than 3) and their Ångström exponent (AE). These parameters are retrieved with the CALIOP operational method, the POLDER operational polarization method and the CALIOP-based depolarization ratio method (DRM) – for which we also propose a calibrated version (denominated DRMSODA, where SODA is the Synergized Optical Depth of Aerosols). We analyse 6 months of data over three distinctive regions characterized by different types of aerosols and clouds. Additionally, for these regions, we select three case studies: a biomass-burning event over the South Atlantic Ocean, a Saharan dust case over the North Atlantic Ocean and a Siberian biomass-burning event over the North Pacific Ocean. Four and a half years of data are studied over the entire globe for distinct situations where aerosol and cloud layers are in contact or vertically separated. Overall, the regional analysis shows a good correlation between the POLDER and the DRMSODA AOTs when the microphysics of aerosols is dominated by fine-mode particles of biomass-burning aerosols from southern Africa (correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.83) or coarse-mode aerosols of Saharan dust (R2 of 0.82). A good correlation between these methods (R2 of 0.68) is also observed in the global treatment, when the aerosol and cloud layers are separated well. The analysis of detached layers also shows a mean difference in AOT of 0.07 at 532 nm between POLDER and DRMSODA at a global scale. The correlation between the retrievals decreases when a complex mixture of aerosols is expected (R2 of 0.37) – as in the East Asia region – and when the aerosol–cloud layers are in contact (R2 of 0.36). The correlation coefficient between the CALIOP operational method and POLDER is found to be low, as the CALIOP method largely underestimates the aerosol loading above clouds by a factor that ranges from 2 to 4. Potential biases on the retrieved AOT as a function of cloud properties are also investigated. For different types of scenes, the retrieval of above-cloud AOT from POLDER and from DRM are compared for different underlying cloud properties (droplet effective radius (reff) and COT retrieved with MODIS). The results reveal that DRM AOT vary with reff. When accounting for reff in the DRM algorithm, the consistency between the methods increases. The sensitivity study shows that an additional polarized signal coming from aerosols located within the cloud could affect the polarization method, which leads to an overestimation of the AOT retrieved with POLDER algorithm. In addition, the aerosols attached to or within the cloud can potentially impact the DRM retrievals through the modification of the cloud droplet chemical composition and its ability to backscatter light. The next step of this work is to combine POLDER and CALIOP to investigate the impacts of aerosols on clouds and climate when these particles are transported above or within clouds.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Deaconu, Lucia T.
Waquet, Fabien
Josset, Damien
Ferlay, Nicolas
Peers, Fanny
Thieuleux, François
Ducos, Fabrice
Pascal, Nicolas
Tanré, Didier
Pelon, Jacques
Goloub, Philippe
author_facet Deaconu, Lucia T.
Waquet, Fabien
Josset, Damien
Ferlay, Nicolas
Peers, Fanny
Thieuleux, François
Ducos, Fabrice
Pascal, Nicolas
Tanré, Didier
Pelon, Jacques
Goloub, Philippe
author_sort Deaconu, Lucia T.
title Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements
title_short Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements
title_full Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements
title_fullStr Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements
title_full_unstemmed Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements
title_sort consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from a-train active and passive measurements
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00008645
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00008602/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf
https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/3499/2017/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
South Atlantic Ocean
genre_facet North Atlantic
South Atlantic Ocean
op_relation Atmospheric Measurement Techniques -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2505596 -- http://www.atmospheric-measurement-techniques.net/ -- 1867-8548
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00008645
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00008602/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf
https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/3499/2017/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf
op_rights uneingeschränkt
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017
container_title Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
container_volume 10
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3499
op_container_end_page 3523
_version_ 1766137321506209792
spelling ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00008645 2023-05-15T17:37:24+02:00 Consistency of aerosols above clouds characterization from A-Train active and passive measurements Deaconu, Lucia T. Waquet, Fabien Josset, Damien Ferlay, Nicolas Peers, Fanny Thieuleux, François Ducos, Fabrice Pascal, Nicolas Tanré, Didier Pelon, Jacques Goloub, Philippe 2017-09 electronic https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00008645 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00008602/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/3499/2017/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf eng eng Copernicus Publications Atmospheric Measurement Techniques -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2505596 -- http://www.atmospheric-measurement-techniques.net/ -- 1867-8548 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00008645 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00008602/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/3499/2017/amt-10-3499-2017.pdf uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article Verlagsveröffentlichung article Text doc-type:article 2017 ftnonlinearchiv https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3499-2017 2022-02-08T22:57:56Z This study presents a comparison between the retrieval of optical properties of aerosol above clouds (AAC) from different techniques developed for the A-Train sensors CALIOP/CALIPSO and POLDER/PARASOL. The main objective is to analyse the consistency between the results derived from the active and the passive measurements. We compare the aerosol optical thickness (AOT) above optically thick clouds (cloud optical thickness (COT) larger than 3) and their Ångström exponent (AE). These parameters are retrieved with the CALIOP operational method, the POLDER operational polarization method and the CALIOP-based depolarization ratio method (DRM) – for which we also propose a calibrated version (denominated DRMSODA, where SODA is the Synergized Optical Depth of Aerosols). We analyse 6 months of data over three distinctive regions characterized by different types of aerosols and clouds. Additionally, for these regions, we select three case studies: a biomass-burning event over the South Atlantic Ocean, a Saharan dust case over the North Atlantic Ocean and a Siberian biomass-burning event over the North Pacific Ocean. Four and a half years of data are studied over the entire globe for distinct situations where aerosol and cloud layers are in contact or vertically separated. Overall, the regional analysis shows a good correlation between the POLDER and the DRMSODA AOTs when the microphysics of aerosols is dominated by fine-mode particles of biomass-burning aerosols from southern Africa (correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.83) or coarse-mode aerosols of Saharan dust (R2 of 0.82). A good correlation between these methods (R2 of 0.68) is also observed in the global treatment, when the aerosol and cloud layers are separated well. The analysis of detached layers also shows a mean difference in AOT of 0.07 at 532 nm between POLDER and DRMSODA at a global scale. The correlation between the retrievals decreases when a complex mixture of aerosols is expected (R2 of 0.37) – as in the East Asia region – and when the aerosol–cloud layers are in contact (R2 of 0.36). The correlation coefficient between the CALIOP operational method and POLDER is found to be low, as the CALIOP method largely underestimates the aerosol loading above clouds by a factor that ranges from 2 to 4. Potential biases on the retrieved AOT as a function of cloud properties are also investigated. For different types of scenes, the retrieval of above-cloud AOT from POLDER and from DRM are compared for different underlying cloud properties (droplet effective radius (reff) and COT retrieved with MODIS). The results reveal that DRM AOT vary with reff. When accounting for reff in the DRM algorithm, the consistency between the methods increases. The sensitivity study shows that an additional polarized signal coming from aerosols located within the cloud could affect the polarization method, which leads to an overestimation of the AOT retrieved with POLDER algorithm. In addition, the aerosols attached to or within the cloud can potentially impact the DRM retrievals through the modification of the cloud droplet chemical composition and its ability to backscatter light. The next step of this work is to combine POLDER and CALIOP to investigate the impacts of aerosols on clouds and climate when these particles are transported above or within clouds. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic South Atlantic Ocean Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA Pacific Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 10 9 3499 3523