The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites

Time series of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour using 33 data sets from 15 different satellite instruments were compared in the framework of the second SPARC (Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate) water vapour assessment (WAVAS-II). This comparison aimed to pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Main Authors: Khosrawi, Farahnaz, Lossow, Stefan, Stiller, Gabriele P., Rosenlof, Karen H., Urban, Joachim, Burrows, John P., Damadeo, Robert P., Eriksson, Patrick, García-Comas, Maya, Gille, John C., Kasai, Yasuko, Kiefer, Michael, Nedoluha, Gerald E., Noël, Stefan, Raspollini, Piera, Read, William G., Rozanov, Alexei, Sioris, Christopher E., Walker, Kaley A., Weigel, Katja
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4435-2018
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00005216
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00005173/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf
https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4435/2018/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf
_version_ 1821518104559091712
author Khosrawi, Farahnaz
Lossow, Stefan
Stiller, Gabriele P.
Rosenlof, Karen H.
Urban, Joachim
Burrows, John P.
Damadeo, Robert P.
Eriksson, Patrick
García-Comas, Maya
Gille, John C.
Kasai, Yasuko
Kiefer, Michael
Nedoluha, Gerald E.
Noël, Stefan
Raspollini, Piera
Read, William G.
Rozanov, Alexei
Sioris, Christopher E.
Walker, Kaley A.
Weigel, Katja
author_facet Khosrawi, Farahnaz
Lossow, Stefan
Stiller, Gabriele P.
Rosenlof, Karen H.
Urban, Joachim
Burrows, John P.
Damadeo, Robert P.
Eriksson, Patrick
García-Comas, Maya
Gille, John C.
Kasai, Yasuko
Kiefer, Michael
Nedoluha, Gerald E.
Noël, Stefan
Raspollini, Piera
Read, William G.
Rozanov, Alexei
Sioris, Christopher E.
Walker, Kaley A.
Weigel, Katja
author_sort Khosrawi, Farahnaz
collection Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4435
container_title Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
container_volume 11
description Time series of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour using 33 data sets from 15 different satellite instruments were compared in the framework of the second SPARC (Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate) water vapour assessment (WAVAS-II). This comparison aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the typical uncertainties in the observational database that can be considered in the future in observational and modelling studies, e.g addressing stratospheric water vapour trends. The time series comparisons are presented for the three latitude bands, the Antarctic (80∘–70∘ S), the tropics (15∘ S–15∘ N) and the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes (50∘–60∘ N) at four different altitudes (0.1, 3, 10 and 80 hPa) covering the stratosphere and lower mesosphere. The combined temporal coverage of observations from the 15 satellite instruments allowed the consideration of the time period 1986–2014. In addition to the qualitative comparison of the time series, the agreement of the data sets is assessed quantitatively in the form of the spread (i.e. the difference between the maximum and minimum volume mixing ratios among the data sets), the (Pearson) correlation coefficient and the drift (i.e. linear changes of the difference between time series over time). Generally, good agreement between the time series was found in the middle stratosphere while larger differences were found in the lower mesosphere and near the tropopause. Concerning the latitude bands, the largest differences were found in the Antarctic while the best agreement was found for the tropics. From our assessment we find that most data sets can be considered in future observational and modelling studies, e.g. addressing stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour variability and trends, if data set specific characteristics (e.g. drift) and restrictions (e.g. temporal and spatial coverage) are taken into account.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
id ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00005216
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftnonlinearchiv
op_container_end_page 4463
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4435-2018
op_relation Atmospheric Measurement Techniques -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2505596 -- http://www.atmospheric-measurement-techniques.net/ -- 1867-8548
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4435-2018
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00005216
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00005173/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf
https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4435/2018/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
uneingeschränkt
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
publishDate 2018
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnonlinearchiv:oai:noa.gwlb.de:cop_mods_00005216 2025-01-16T19:01:03+00:00 The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites Khosrawi, Farahnaz Lossow, Stefan Stiller, Gabriele P. Rosenlof, Karen H. Urban, Joachim Burrows, John P. Damadeo, Robert P. Eriksson, Patrick García-Comas, Maya Gille, John C. Kasai, Yasuko Kiefer, Michael Nedoluha, Gerald E. Noël, Stefan Raspollini, Piera Read, William G. Rozanov, Alexei Sioris, Christopher E. Walker, Kaley A. Weigel, Katja 2018-07 electronic https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4435-2018 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00005216 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00005173/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4435/2018/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf eng eng Copernicus Publications Atmospheric Measurement Techniques -- http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2505596 -- http://www.atmospheric-measurement-techniques.net/ -- 1867-8548 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4435-2018 https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00005216 https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00005173/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4435/2018/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ uneingeschränkt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY article Verlagsveröffentlichung article Text doc-type:article 2018 ftnonlinearchiv https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4435-2018 2022-02-08T22:59:42Z Time series of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour using 33 data sets from 15 different satellite instruments were compared in the framework of the second SPARC (Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And their Role in Climate) water vapour assessment (WAVAS-II). This comparison aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the typical uncertainties in the observational database that can be considered in the future in observational and modelling studies, e.g addressing stratospheric water vapour trends. The time series comparisons are presented for the three latitude bands, the Antarctic (80∘–70∘ S), the tropics (15∘ S–15∘ N) and the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes (50∘–60∘ N) at four different altitudes (0.1, 3, 10 and 80 hPa) covering the stratosphere and lower mesosphere. The combined temporal coverage of observations from the 15 satellite instruments allowed the consideration of the time period 1986–2014. In addition to the qualitative comparison of the time series, the agreement of the data sets is assessed quantitatively in the form of the spread (i.e. the difference between the maximum and minimum volume mixing ratios among the data sets), the (Pearson) correlation coefficient and the drift (i.e. linear changes of the difference between time series over time). Generally, good agreement between the time series was found in the middle stratosphere while larger differences were found in the lower mesosphere and near the tropopause. Concerning the latitude bands, the largest differences were found in the Antarctic while the best agreement was found for the tropics. From our assessment we find that most data sets can be considered in future observational and modelling studies, e.g. addressing stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour variability and trends, if data set specific characteristics (e.g. drift) and restrictions (e.g. temporal and spatial coverage) are taken into account. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Niedersächsisches Online-Archiv NOA Antarctic The Antarctic Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 11 7 4435 4463
spellingShingle article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
Khosrawi, Farahnaz
Lossow, Stefan
Stiller, Gabriele P.
Rosenlof, Karen H.
Urban, Joachim
Burrows, John P.
Damadeo, Robert P.
Eriksson, Patrick
García-Comas, Maya
Gille, John C.
Kasai, Yasuko
Kiefer, Michael
Nedoluha, Gerald E.
Noël, Stefan
Raspollini, Piera
Read, William G.
Rozanov, Alexei
Sioris, Christopher E.
Walker, Kaley A.
Weigel, Katja
The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
title The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
title_full The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
title_fullStr The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
title_full_unstemmed The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
title_short The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
title_sort sparc water vapour assessment ii: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
topic article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
topic_facet article
Verlagsveröffentlichung
url https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4435-2018
https://noa.gwlb.de/receive/cop_mods_00005216
https://noa.gwlb.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/cop_derivate_00005173/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf
https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4435/2018/amt-11-4435-2018.pdf