Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?

The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foods
Main Authors: Waldenstrøm, Lene, Wahlgren, Marte Berg, Strand, Åse, Lerfall, Jørgen, Øvrum Gaarder, Mari
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3035068
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170
id ftnofima:oai:nofima.brage.unit.no:11250/3035068
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnofima:oai:nofima.brage.unit.no:11250/3035068 2023-05-15T15:32:30+02:00 Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real? Waldenstrøm, Lene Wahlgren, Marte Berg Strand, Åse Lerfall, Jørgen Øvrum Gaarder, Mari 2022 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3035068 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170 eng eng Nofima AS: 202103 Norges forskningsråd: 314318 Foods. 2022, 11 (14), . urn:issn:2304-8158 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3035068 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170 cristin:2041231 18 11 Foods 14 Quantitative Smoke flavoring Consumer Attitude Atlantisk laks Atlantic salmon Peer reviewed Journal article 2022 ftnofima https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170 2022-12-07T23:46:20Z The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conventional smoking. Manufacturers of CSS are, however, hesitant to use all kinds of smoke-flavoring due to expected consumer skepticism. In the digital survey, the expected skepticism was confirmed (n = 487). Only 15% of the respondents were positively oriented toward smoke-flavoring of CSS. The selection criterion for the focus group discussion was based on the results from the survey and resulted in three attitude-oriented focus groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The negative focus group considered smoke-flavored CSS to be unnatural and out of the question to buy or eat. Unlike the negative focus group, the neutral group was curious to learn more and open to potential smoke-flavor benefits. However, credible information or science was crucial to influence CSS choice. Future studies may investigate whether the existent of this large group of curious neutral consumers (47% of the respondents) influence manufacturers (of CSS) skepticism or how various types of product information could steer consumer acceptance of smoke-flavoring of CSS. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Nofima Knowledge Archive (Brage) Foods 11 14 2170
institution Open Polar
collection Nofima Knowledge Archive (Brage)
op_collection_id ftnofima
language English
topic Quantitative
Smoke flavoring
Consumer
Attitude
Atlantisk laks
Atlantic salmon
spellingShingle Quantitative
Smoke flavoring
Consumer
Attitude
Atlantisk laks
Atlantic salmon
Waldenstrøm, Lene
Wahlgren, Marte Berg
Strand, Åse
Lerfall, Jørgen
Øvrum Gaarder, Mari
Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
topic_facet Quantitative
Smoke flavoring
Consumer
Attitude
Atlantisk laks
Atlantic salmon
description The aim of the present study was to explore Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward smoke-flavoring of cold smoked salmon (CSS), by conducting a digital survey and focus group discussions. Some of the smoke-flavoring techniques, like atomized purified condensed smoke, is considered healthier than conventional smoking. Manufacturers of CSS are, however, hesitant to use all kinds of smoke-flavoring due to expected consumer skepticism. In the digital survey, the expected skepticism was confirmed (n = 487). Only 15% of the respondents were positively oriented toward smoke-flavoring of CSS. The selection criterion for the focus group discussion was based on the results from the survey and resulted in three attitude-oriented focus groups (negative, neutral, and positive). The negative focus group considered smoke-flavored CSS to be unnatural and out of the question to buy or eat. Unlike the negative focus group, the neutral group was curious to learn more and open to potential smoke-flavor benefits. However, credible information or science was crucial to influence CSS choice. Future studies may investigate whether the existent of this large group of curious neutral consumers (47% of the respondents) influence manufacturers (of CSS) skepticism or how various types of product information could steer consumer acceptance of smoke-flavoring of CSS. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Waldenstrøm, Lene
Wahlgren, Marte Berg
Strand, Åse
Lerfall, Jørgen
Øvrum Gaarder, Mari
author_facet Waldenstrøm, Lene
Wahlgren, Marte Berg
Strand, Åse
Lerfall, Jørgen
Øvrum Gaarder, Mari
author_sort Waldenstrøm, Lene
title Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_short Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_full Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_fullStr Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_full_unstemmed Norwegian Consumers’ Skepticism towards Smoke-Flavoring of Salmon—Is It for Real?
title_sort norwegian consumers’ skepticism towards smoke-flavoring of salmon—is it for real?
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3035068
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170
genre Atlantic salmon
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
op_source 18
11
Foods
14
op_relation Nofima AS: 202103
Norges forskningsråd: 314318
Foods. 2022, 11 (14), .
urn:issn:2304-8158
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3035068
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170
cristin:2041231
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142170
container_title Foods
container_volume 11
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2170
_version_ 1766362992452042752