Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway

Strategic environmental assessments (SEAs) are used in coastal zone planning in Norway to assess how changed area-use can impact a variety of uses and interests and make recommendations for trade-off decisions between them. The transparency and consistency of the SEAs are important for their through...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean & Coastal Management
Main Authors: Mikkelsen, Eirik Inge, Sørdahl, Patrick Berg, Solås, Ann-Magnhild
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2994611
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106150
id ftnofima:oai:nofima.brage.unit.no:11250/2994611
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnofima:oai:nofima.brage.unit.no:11250/2994611 2023-05-15T17:43:32+02:00 Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway Mikkelsen, Eirik Inge Sørdahl, Patrick Berg Solås, Ann-Magnhild 2022 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2994611 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106150 eng eng Nofima AS: 11553 Nofima AS: 11670 Norges forskningsråd: 254850 Norges forskningsråd: 294799 Norges forskningsråd: 255767 Nofima AS: 12647 urn:issn:0964-5691 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2994611 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106150 cristin:2020728 225 Ocean and Coastal Management Peer reviewed Journal article 2022 ftnofima https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106150 2022-11-18T06:50:56Z Strategic environmental assessments (SEAs) are used in coastal zone planning in Norway to assess how changed area-use can impact a variety of uses and interests and make recommendations for trade-off decisions between them. The transparency and consistency of the SEAs are important for their throughput legitimacy. This paper analyses how the set up and practices of SEA processes affect their transparency and consistency, how they can be improved, and what trade-offs there may be between the two. This is based on cases studies of SEAs in two intermunicipal planning processes involving 143 proposed aquaculture areas in 18 municipalities in Northern Norway. Marine aquaculture in the form of salmon farming has grown into a major industry on the Norwegian coast, and there are ambitions for further growth. Salmon farming is a major driver for coastal zone planning in Norway as many municipalities hope it will provide jobs and income and fish farms must be placed in accordance with municipal coastal zone plans. The paper specifically analyses how proposed aquaculture areas were handled in the SEAs, including their knowledge base, assessment methods used and actual trade-offs, and how this impact transparency and consistency. Consistency is considered both across geographies and SEA processes and through the individual SEA processes. Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway Nofima Knowledge Archive (Brage) Norway Ocean & Coastal Management 225 106150
institution Open Polar
collection Nofima Knowledge Archive (Brage)
op_collection_id ftnofima
language English
description Strategic environmental assessments (SEAs) are used in coastal zone planning in Norway to assess how changed area-use can impact a variety of uses and interests and make recommendations for trade-off decisions between them. The transparency and consistency of the SEAs are important for their throughput legitimacy. This paper analyses how the set up and practices of SEA processes affect their transparency and consistency, how they can be improved, and what trade-offs there may be between the two. This is based on cases studies of SEAs in two intermunicipal planning processes involving 143 proposed aquaculture areas in 18 municipalities in Northern Norway. Marine aquaculture in the form of salmon farming has grown into a major industry on the Norwegian coast, and there are ambitions for further growth. Salmon farming is a major driver for coastal zone planning in Norway as many municipalities hope it will provide jobs and income and fish farms must be placed in accordance with municipal coastal zone plans. The paper specifically analyses how proposed aquaculture areas were handled in the SEAs, including their knowledge base, assessment methods used and actual trade-offs, and how this impact transparency and consistency. Consistency is considered both across geographies and SEA processes and through the individual SEA processes. Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mikkelsen, Eirik Inge
Sørdahl, Patrick Berg
Solås, Ann-Magnhild
spellingShingle Mikkelsen, Eirik Inge
Sørdahl, Patrick Berg
Solås, Ann-Magnhild
Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway
author_facet Mikkelsen, Eirik Inge
Sørdahl, Patrick Berg
Solås, Ann-Magnhild
author_sort Mikkelsen, Eirik Inge
title Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway
title_short Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway
title_full Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway
title_fullStr Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Transparent and consistent? Aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in Norway
title_sort transparent and consistent? aquaculture impact assessments and trade-offs in coastal zone planning in norway
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2994611
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106150
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_source 225
Ocean and Coastal Management
op_relation Nofima AS: 11553
Nofima AS: 11670
Norges forskningsråd: 254850
Norges forskningsråd: 294799
Norges forskningsråd: 255767
Nofima AS: 12647
urn:issn:0964-5691
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2994611
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106150
cristin:2020728
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106150
container_title Ocean & Coastal Management
container_volume 225
container_start_page 106150
_version_ 1766145625376686080