Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming

The Arctic climate system is very sensitive to external perturbations, which results in more rapid surface air temperature (SAT) changes in the Arctic compared to lower latitudes. This study aims at assessing the performance of global climate models from the phases 5 and 6 of the Coupled Model Inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Science
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16886
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016755/
id ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00016886
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00016886 2023-05-15T14:32:25+02:00 Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming 2021-12 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16886 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016755/ en eng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100677 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16886 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016755/ Polar Science, 30, 100677(2021-12) 18739652 Early twentieth century warming Arctic amplification Global climate models The Arctic Internal variability Journal Article 2021 ftnipr https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100677 2023-02-18T20:11:55Z The Arctic climate system is very sensitive to external perturbations, which results in more rapid surface air temperature (SAT) changes in the Arctic compared to lower latitudes. This study aims at assessing the performance of global climate models from the phases 5 and 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6) in reproducing the periods of Arctic warming and cooling known from the observations. Two experiments are considered for 9 CMIP5 models, and one experiment is used for the 108 ensemble members from 32 CMIP6 models. The ensemble mean of unforced Arctic amplification variability in the CMIP5 pre-industrial control experiment suggests a crucial role of external forcings in the present Arctic amplification. The ensemble mean of the same models in the historical experiment shows a century-long upward trend and clearly reproduces the present-day Arctic amplification. However, there is no consistent response of increasing Arctic amplification in the early twentieth century warming period during the 1920s–1940s in the CMIP5 models. This indicates the 1920s–1940s Arctic warming was unlikely to happen due to external forcings. Using the large CMIP6 ensemble in the historical experiment we show that the multi-model ensemble mean in the new generation of high-resolution CMIP6 models does not reproduce that warming either, thus posing questions how well the models capture internal climate variability and distinguish it from natural and anthropogenic forcings. This issue ultimately affects the reliability of future Arctic climate projections. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Polar Science Polar Science National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan Arctic Polar Science 30 100677
institution Open Polar
collection National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan
op_collection_id ftnipr
language English
topic Early twentieth century warming
Arctic amplification
Global climate models
The Arctic
Internal variability
spellingShingle Early twentieth century warming
Arctic amplification
Global climate models
The Arctic
Internal variability
Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming
topic_facet Early twentieth century warming
Arctic amplification
Global climate models
The Arctic
Internal variability
description The Arctic climate system is very sensitive to external perturbations, which results in more rapid surface air temperature (SAT) changes in the Arctic compared to lower latitudes. This study aims at assessing the performance of global climate models from the phases 5 and 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6) in reproducing the periods of Arctic warming and cooling known from the observations. Two experiments are considered for 9 CMIP5 models, and one experiment is used for the 108 ensemble members from 32 CMIP6 models. The ensemble mean of unforced Arctic amplification variability in the CMIP5 pre-industrial control experiment suggests a crucial role of external forcings in the present Arctic amplification. The ensemble mean of the same models in the historical experiment shows a century-long upward trend and clearly reproduces the present-day Arctic amplification. However, there is no consistent response of increasing Arctic amplification in the early twentieth century warming period during the 1920s–1940s in the CMIP5 models. This indicates the 1920s–1940s Arctic warming was unlikely to happen due to external forcings. Using the large CMIP6 ensemble in the historical experiment we show that the multi-model ensemble mean in the new generation of high-resolution CMIP6 models does not reproduce that warming either, thus posing questions how well the models capture internal climate variability and distinguish it from natural and anthropogenic forcings. This issue ultimately affects the reliability of future Arctic climate projections.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming
title_short Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming
title_full Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming
title_fullStr Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming
title_full_unstemmed Multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century Arctic warming
title_sort multi-model ensemble mean of global climate models fails to reproduce early twentieth century arctic warming
publishDate 2021
url https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16886
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016755/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Polar Science
Polar Science
genre_facet Arctic
Polar Science
Polar Science
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100677
https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16886
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016755/
Polar Science, 30, 100677(2021-12)
18739652
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100677
container_title Polar Science
container_volume 30
container_start_page 100677
_version_ 1766305826104934400