Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica

In situ ozonesonde observations across nine Antarctic stations were used to validate the vertical profiles retrieved by the satellite-based Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) instrument from 2004 to 2019. Intra-annual variations in the ozone concentration, along with the shape of the vertical profiles are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Science
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
MLS
Online Access:https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16866
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016736/
id ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00016866
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00016866 2023-05-15T13:46:39+02:00 Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica 2021-12 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16866 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016736/ en eng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100688 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16866 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016736/ Polar Science, 30, 100688(2021-12) 18739652 Ozone depletion Antarctic ozone MLS Ozonesonde Journal Article 2021 ftnipr https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100688 2023-02-18T20:11:55Z In situ ozonesonde observations across nine Antarctic stations were used to validate the vertical profiles retrieved by the satellite-based Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) instrument from 2004 to 2019. Intra-annual variations in the ozone concentration, along with the shape of the vertical profiles are well reproduced by the MLS with differences in the range of ±20%, although seasonally the differences were as high as 60%. The largest differences were also observed during the spring (September-October-November), when largescale ozone depletion takes place over Antarctica, with MLS overestimating concentrations at almost all the stations, except the northernmost stations of Marambio and Dumont d’Urville. This has implications for the estimations of ozone recovery over Antarctica based on MLS. The under-estimation or over-estimation in the MLS data caused differences up to ±1 K day−1 in the estimated heating rate. For the whole dataset, a good correlation (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.001) was seen at all the stations except at Maitri, where the correlation coefficient was lower but still significant (R2 = 0.77, p < 0.001). These results show that although the MLS data match the in-situ observations over longer averaging periods, for individual profiles the discrepancies are much higher and need to be considered when computing the ozone impacts using MLS data. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Polar Science Polar Science National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan Antarctic Marambio ENVELOPE(-56.750,-56.750,-64.283,-64.283) Maitri ENVELOPE(11.733,11.733,-70.764,-70.764) Dumont d’Urville ENVELOPE(140.000,140.000,-66.667,-66.667) Polar Science 30 100688
institution Open Polar
collection National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan
op_collection_id ftnipr
language English
topic Ozone depletion
Antarctic ozone
MLS
Ozonesonde
spellingShingle Ozone depletion
Antarctic ozone
MLS
Ozonesonde
Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica
topic_facet Ozone depletion
Antarctic ozone
MLS
Ozonesonde
description In situ ozonesonde observations across nine Antarctic stations were used to validate the vertical profiles retrieved by the satellite-based Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) instrument from 2004 to 2019. Intra-annual variations in the ozone concentration, along with the shape of the vertical profiles are well reproduced by the MLS with differences in the range of ±20%, although seasonally the differences were as high as 60%. The largest differences were also observed during the spring (September-October-November), when largescale ozone depletion takes place over Antarctica, with MLS overestimating concentrations at almost all the stations, except the northernmost stations of Marambio and Dumont d’Urville. This has implications for the estimations of ozone recovery over Antarctica based on MLS. The under-estimation or over-estimation in the MLS data caused differences up to ±1 K day−1 in the estimated heating rate. For the whole dataset, a good correlation (R2 > 0.9, p < 0.001) was seen at all the stations except at Maitri, where the correlation coefficient was lower but still significant (R2 = 0.77, p < 0.001). These results show that although the MLS data match the in-situ observations over longer averaging periods, for individual profiles the discrepancies are much higher and need to be considered when computing the ozone impacts using MLS data.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica
title_short Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica
title_full Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica
title_fullStr Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica
title_full_unstemmed Differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across Antarctica
title_sort differences between in-situ ozonesonde observations and satellite retrieved ozone vertical profiles across antarctica
publishDate 2021
url https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16866
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016736/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.750,-56.750,-64.283,-64.283)
ENVELOPE(11.733,11.733,-70.764,-70.764)
ENVELOPE(140.000,140.000,-66.667,-66.667)
geographic Antarctic
Marambio
Maitri
Dumont d’Urville
geographic_facet Antarctic
Marambio
Maitri
Dumont d’Urville
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Science
Polar Science
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Polar Science
Polar Science
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100688
https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=16866
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00016736/
Polar Science, 30, 100688(2021-12)
18739652
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100688
container_title Polar Science
container_volume 30
container_start_page 100688
_version_ 1766244948992065536