Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016

The vast pan-Arctic wetlands appear to be a large source of methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas. Here, I simulated CH4 emission from pan-Arctic wetlands (above 60°N) over the period 1901–2016 using a process-based biogeochemical model (VISIT), including two different schemes of wetland CH4 produc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Science
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15913
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015807/
id ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00015913
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00015913 2023-05-15T14:54:47+02:00 Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016 2019-09 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15913 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015807/ en eng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.12.001 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15913 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015807/ Polar Science, 21, 26-36(2019-09) 18739652 Climate change Greenhouse gas Tundra VISIT model Journal Article 2019 ftnipr https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.12.001 2022-12-03T19:43:10Z The vast pan-Arctic wetlands appear to be a large source of methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas. Here, I simulated CH4 emission from pan-Arctic wetlands (above 60°N) over the period 1901–2016 using a process-based biogeochemical model (VISIT), including two different schemes of wetland CH4 production, that was forced by historical atmospheric composition, climate, and land-use conditions. The two schemes simulated mean wetland CH4 emission rates of 10.9 and 11.4 Tg CH4 yr−1 in the 2000s with slightly different spatial source distributions. Both simulations showed clear seasonal cycles of CH4 emission, but the two schemes had different amplitudes and peak months. The schemes differed markedly in their simulated long-term patterns (i.e., a stationary trend and an increasing decadal trend), making it difficult to relate them to global atmospheric trends in a consistent manner. Linear regression analysis clarified the agreements and differences in environmental sensitivity and biological control of CH4 production simulated by the schemes. The time-series of CH4 emission in northern North America, northern Europe, and Siberia showed different patterns of correlation with two major meteorological teleconnection indices. This model-based study implied that the high-latitude CH4 emission accounts for 5–7% of global wetland emission and would play increasingly important roles (e.g., positive feedback) under changing climate. To reduce estimation uncertainties, as demonstrated by the comparison of two schemes, we need further studies for improving biogeochemical models in collaboration with field studies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change Polar Science Polar Science Tundra Siberia National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan Arctic Polar Science 21 26 36
institution Open Polar
collection National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan
op_collection_id ftnipr
language English
topic Climate change
Greenhouse gas
Tundra
VISIT model
spellingShingle Climate change
Greenhouse gas
Tundra
VISIT model
Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016
topic_facet Climate change
Greenhouse gas
Tundra
VISIT model
description The vast pan-Arctic wetlands appear to be a large source of methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas. Here, I simulated CH4 emission from pan-Arctic wetlands (above 60°N) over the period 1901–2016 using a process-based biogeochemical model (VISIT), including two different schemes of wetland CH4 production, that was forced by historical atmospheric composition, climate, and land-use conditions. The two schemes simulated mean wetland CH4 emission rates of 10.9 and 11.4 Tg CH4 yr−1 in the 2000s with slightly different spatial source distributions. Both simulations showed clear seasonal cycles of CH4 emission, but the two schemes had different amplitudes and peak months. The schemes differed markedly in their simulated long-term patterns (i.e., a stationary trend and an increasing decadal trend), making it difficult to relate them to global atmospheric trends in a consistent manner. Linear regression analysis clarified the agreements and differences in environmental sensitivity and biological control of CH4 production simulated by the schemes. The time-series of CH4 emission in northern North America, northern Europe, and Siberia showed different patterns of correlation with two major meteorological teleconnection indices. This model-based study implied that the high-latitude CH4 emission accounts for 5–7% of global wetland emission and would play increasingly important roles (e.g., positive feedback) under changing climate. To reduce estimation uncertainties, as demonstrated by the comparison of two schemes, we need further studies for improving biogeochemical models in collaboration with field studies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016
title_short Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016
title_full Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016
title_fullStr Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016
title_full_unstemmed Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016
title_sort methane emission from pan-arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901–2016
publishDate 2019
url https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15913
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015807/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Polar Science
Polar Science
Tundra
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Polar Science
Polar Science
Tundra
Siberia
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.12.001
https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15913
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015807/
Polar Science, 21, 26-36(2019-09)
18739652
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.12.001
container_title Polar Science
container_volume 21
container_start_page 26
op_container_end_page 36
_version_ 1766326526454792192