Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice

Electric thermal drills are more advantageous than electromechanical drills in temperate, near-temperate, and polythermal glaciers because they can avoid problems arising from refreezing of wet chips, which causes drills to become stuck in the borehole. When the refreezing rate of meltwater in boreh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Science
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15099
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015009/
id ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00015099
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnipr:oai:nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp:00015099 2023-05-15T18:02:48+02:00 Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice 2018-09 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15099 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015009/ en eng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.05.007 https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15099 http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015009/ Polar Science, 17, 13-22(2018-09) 18739652 Thermal drill Thermal coring head Meltwater remova Journal Article 2018 ftnipr https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.05.007 2022-12-03T19:43:10Z Electric thermal drills are more advantageous than electromechanical drills in temperate, near-temperate, and polythermal glaciers because they can avoid problems arising from refreezing of wet chips, which causes drills to become stuck in the borehole. When the refreezing rate of meltwater in borehole is expected to be too high and there is no considerable englacial water flow, thermal drills with meltwater removal system are optional for open-hole shallow (200–300 m) ice coring. To reach a sufficiently high rate of penetration of approximately 6–7 m h−1, the power density of thermal head should be maintained in the range of 100–110 W cm−2, which can be provided by tubular elements cast integrally with an aluminum or copper annulus. To remove meltwater via air reverse circulation, thermal drills can be equipped with a small blower. The safest and most even mode of water removal is lifting in the form of water film on the wall of air sucking tubes. The maximum water removal rate using a single water-lifting pipe via air reverse circulation created by a blower with a sucking power of 110 airwatts was ∼0.35 L min−1. Assuming a penetration rate of 6–7 m h−1 and the outer and inner diameters of 135 and 110 mm, respectively, of the drill head, the meltwater should be removed at a rate not less than 0.8–1.0 L min−1. In this case, at least three water-lifting pipes should be used in the drill. Article in Journal/Newspaper Polar Science Polar Science National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan Polar Science 17 13 22
institution Open Polar
collection National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Japan
op_collection_id ftnipr
language English
topic Thermal drill
Thermal coring head
Meltwater remova
spellingShingle Thermal drill
Thermal coring head
Meltwater remova
Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice
topic_facet Thermal drill
Thermal coring head
Meltwater remova
description Electric thermal drills are more advantageous than electromechanical drills in temperate, near-temperate, and polythermal glaciers because they can avoid problems arising from refreezing of wet chips, which causes drills to become stuck in the borehole. When the refreezing rate of meltwater in borehole is expected to be too high and there is no considerable englacial water flow, thermal drills with meltwater removal system are optional for open-hole shallow (200–300 m) ice coring. To reach a sufficiently high rate of penetration of approximately 6–7 m h−1, the power density of thermal head should be maintained in the range of 100–110 W cm−2, which can be provided by tubular elements cast integrally with an aluminum or copper annulus. To remove meltwater via air reverse circulation, thermal drills can be equipped with a small blower. The safest and most even mode of water removal is lifting in the form of water film on the wall of air sucking tubes. The maximum water removal rate using a single water-lifting pipe via air reverse circulation created by a blower with a sucking power of 110 airwatts was ∼0.35 L min−1. Assuming a penetration rate of 6–7 m h−1 and the outer and inner diameters of 135 and 110 mm, respectively, of the drill head, the meltwater should be removed at a rate not less than 0.8–1.0 L min−1. In this case, at least three water-lifting pipes should be used in the drill.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
title Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice
title_short Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice
title_full Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice
title_fullStr Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice
title_full_unstemmed Electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice
title_sort electric thermal drills for open-hole coring in ice
publishDate 2018
url https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15099
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015009/
genre Polar Science
Polar Science
genre_facet Polar Science
Polar Science
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.05.007
https://nipr.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=15099
http://id.nii.ac.jp/1291/00015009/
Polar Science, 17, 13-22(2018-09)
18739652
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2018.05.007
container_title Polar Science
container_volume 17
container_start_page 13
op_container_end_page 22
_version_ 1766173454350942208