Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic?

In a recent paper in Current Biology, Ashton et al. [1] describe the results of what they call the first ever experiment in which benthic assemblages are warmed to ecologically relevant levels in situ. West of the Antarctic peninsula, the authors employed heated settlement panels and studied the set...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current Biology
Main Author: Van der Meer, J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/46/310446.pdf
id ftnioz:oai:imis.nioz.nl:291693
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnioz:oai:imis.nioz.nl:291693 2023-05-15T13:47:57+02:00 Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic? Van der Meer, J. 2017 application/pdf https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/46/310446.pdf en eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000418285000005 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.065 https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/46/310446.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess %3Ci%3ECurr.+Biol.+27%2824%29%3C%2Fi%3E%3A+R1302-R1303.+%3Ca+href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.cub.2017.10.065%22+target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.cub.2017.10.065%3C%2Fa%3E info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2017 ftnioz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.065 2022-05-01T14:06:57Z In a recent paper in Current Biology, Ashton et al. [1] describe the results of what they call the first ever experiment in which benthic assemblages are warmed to ecologically relevant levels in situ. West of the Antarctic peninsula, the authors employed heated settlement panels and studied the settlement and growth of pioneering species over a 5-month period at ambient temperature and at 1°C and 2°C above ambient. Such ocean temperature increases are expected within the next 50–100 years. They claim that the two most dominant species doubled their growth rate already at an increase of 1°C. They further state that this implies Q10 coefficients around 1,000, which is much higher than anticipated. This unpredicted result should, according to the authors, critically change our thinking of how polar communities might respond to ocean warming. Indeed, such extreme Q10 coefficients are a surprising result, and not in accordance with more than a century of laboratory or field research in temperate zones. Here, I will show that the claim is unsubstantiated and that the observed in situ growth-rate response to temperature of these Antarctic species is much weaker than claimed, and not very different from previous work in the temperate zone. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula NIOZ Repository (Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research) Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Ashton ENVELOPE(-62.183,-62.183,-70.717,-70.717) The Antarctic Current Biology 27 24 R1302 R1303
institution Open Polar
collection NIOZ Repository (Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research)
op_collection_id ftnioz
language English
description In a recent paper in Current Biology, Ashton et al. [1] describe the results of what they call the first ever experiment in which benthic assemblages are warmed to ecologically relevant levels in situ. West of the Antarctic peninsula, the authors employed heated settlement panels and studied the settlement and growth of pioneering species over a 5-month period at ambient temperature and at 1°C and 2°C above ambient. Such ocean temperature increases are expected within the next 50–100 years. They claim that the two most dominant species doubled their growth rate already at an increase of 1°C. They further state that this implies Q10 coefficients around 1,000, which is much higher than anticipated. This unpredicted result should, according to the authors, critically change our thinking of how polar communities might respond to ocean warming. Indeed, such extreme Q10 coefficients are a surprising result, and not in accordance with more than a century of laboratory or field research in temperate zones. Here, I will show that the claim is unsubstantiated and that the observed in situ growth-rate response to temperature of these Antarctic species is much weaker than claimed, and not very different from previous work in the temperate zone.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Van der Meer, J.
spellingShingle Van der Meer, J.
Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic?
author_facet Van der Meer, J.
author_sort Van der Meer, J.
title Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic?
title_short Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic?
title_full Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic?
title_fullStr Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic?
title_full_unstemmed Are the Q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for Antarctic seabed fauna realistic?
title_sort are the q 10 values of more than 1,000 reported for antarctic seabed fauna realistic?
publishDate 2017
url https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/46/310446.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.183,-62.183,-70.717,-70.717)
geographic Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Ashton
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Ashton
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
op_source %3Ci%3ECurr.+Biol.+27%2824%29%3C%2Fi%3E%3A+R1302-R1303.+%3Ca+href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.cub.2017.10.065%22+target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.cub.2017.10.065%3C%2Fa%3E
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000418285000005
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.065
https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/46/310446.pdf
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.065
container_title Current Biology
container_volume 27
container_issue 24
container_start_page R1302
op_container_end_page R1303
_version_ 1766248049882955776