Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction

Grazing ecosystems ranging from the Arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are (1)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Monographs
Main Authors: Howison, R.A., Olff, H., van de Koppel, J., Smit, C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/06/305406.pdf
id ftnioz:oai:imis.nioz.nl:287762
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnioz:oai:imis.nioz.nl:287762 2023-05-15T15:07:21+02:00 Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction Howison, R.A. Olff, H. van de Koppel, J. Smit, C. 2017 application/pdf https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/06/305406.pdf en eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000406722400001 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1259 https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/06/305406.pdf info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess %3Ci%3EEcol.+Monogr.+87%283%29%3C%2Fi%3E%3A+363-378.+%3Ca+href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fecm.1259%22+target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fecm.1259%3C%2Fa%3E info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2017 ftnioz https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1259 2022-05-01T14:05:56Z Grazing ecosystems ranging from the Arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are (1) herbivore-driven nutrient cycling, (2) plant-growth–water-infiltration feedback under aridity, and (3) irreversible local herbivore-induced abiotic stress (topsoil erosion, salinity). However, these insufficiently explain the high temporal patch dynamics and wide-ranging distribution of grazing mosaics across productive habitats. Here we propose a fourth possibility where alternating patches are governed by the interplay of two important biotic processes: bioturbation by soil fauna that locally ameliorates soil conditions, promoting tall plant communities, alternating with biocompaction by large herbivores that locally impairs soil conditions, and promotes lawn communities. We review mechanisms that explain rapid conversions between bioturbation- and biocompaction-dominated patches, and provide a global map where this mechanism is possible. With a simple model we illustrate that this fourth mechanism expands the range of conditions under which grazing mosaics can persist. We conclude that the response of grazing systems to global change, as degradation or catastrophic droughts, will be contingent on the correct identification of the dominant process that drives their vegetation structural heterogeneity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Tundra NIOZ Repository (Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research) Arctic Ecological Monographs 87 3 363 378
institution Open Polar
collection NIOZ Repository (Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research)
op_collection_id ftnioz
language English
description Grazing ecosystems ranging from the Arctic tundra to tropical savannas are often characterized by small-scale mosaics of herbivore-preferred and herbivore-avoided patches, promoting plant biodiversity and resilience. The three leading explanations for bistable patchiness in grazed ecosystems are (1) herbivore-driven nutrient cycling, (2) plant-growth–water-infiltration feedback under aridity, and (3) irreversible local herbivore-induced abiotic stress (topsoil erosion, salinity). However, these insufficiently explain the high temporal patch dynamics and wide-ranging distribution of grazing mosaics across productive habitats. Here we propose a fourth possibility where alternating patches are governed by the interplay of two important biotic processes: bioturbation by soil fauna that locally ameliorates soil conditions, promoting tall plant communities, alternating with biocompaction by large herbivores that locally impairs soil conditions, and promotes lawn communities. We review mechanisms that explain rapid conversions between bioturbation- and biocompaction-dominated patches, and provide a global map where this mechanism is possible. With a simple model we illustrate that this fourth mechanism expands the range of conditions under which grazing mosaics can persist. We conclude that the response of grazing systems to global change, as degradation or catastrophic droughts, will be contingent on the correct identification of the dominant process that drives their vegetation structural heterogeneity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Howison, R.A.
Olff, H.
van de Koppel, J.
Smit, C.
spellingShingle Howison, R.A.
Olff, H.
van de Koppel, J.
Smit, C.
Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
author_facet Howison, R.A.
Olff, H.
van de Koppel, J.
Smit, C.
author_sort Howison, R.A.
title Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_short Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_full Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_fullStr Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_full_unstemmed Biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
title_sort biotically driven vegetation mosaics in grazing ecosystems: the battle between bioturbation and biocompaction
publishDate 2017
url https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/06/305406.pdf
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
op_source %3Ci%3EEcol.+Monogr.+87%283%29%3C%2Fi%3E%3A+363-378.+%3Ca+href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fecm.1259%22+target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%2Fecm.1259%3C%2Fa%3E
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000406722400001
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1259
https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/06/305406.pdf
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1259
container_title Ecological Monographs
container_volume 87
container_issue 3
container_start_page 363
op_container_end_page 378
_version_ 1766338870323970048