Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?

Planktonic foraminifera shell weights have been recognized as possible proxy for surface water carbonate ion concentration [CO sup(=) sub(3)] and atmospheric CO sub(2). However, to utilize this proxy, it is important to understand whether shell weights truly reflect surface water [CO sup(=) sub(3)]....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naik, S.S., Godad, S.P., Naidu, P.D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Current Science Association 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/3970
id ftnio:oai:dsr.nio.org:2264/3970
record_format openpolar
spelling ftnio:oai:dsr.nio.org:2264/3970 2023-05-15T18:00:35+02:00 Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions? Naik, S.S. Godad, S.P. Naidu, P.D. 2011 http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/3970 en eng Current Science Association Copyright [2011]. All efforts have been made to respect the copyright to the best of our knowledge. Inadvertent omissions, if brought to our notice, stand for correction and withdrawal of document from this repository. calcification foraminifera surface water Globigerina bulloides Journal Article 2011 ftnio 2012-08-25T20:10:21Z Planktonic foraminifera shell weights have been recognized as possible proxy for surface water carbonate ion concentration [CO sup(=) sub(3)] and atmospheric CO sub(2). However, to utilize this proxy, it is important to understand whether shell weights truly reflect surface water [CO sup(=) sub(3)]. We utilize shell weights of Globigerina bulloides and Globigerinoides ruber in the size range of 300 to 355 mu m from a sediment core recovered from above the lysocline in the upwelling region of western Arabian Sea. Shell weights of G. ruber and G. bulloides show significant correlation with their shell size from recent to 16 kyr, which suggests that shell calcification was controlled by optimum growth conditions. On the other hand, during 16 to 22 kyr, there is no correlation between shell weights and shell size. However, shell weights of G. bulloides exhibit significant negative correlation with annual sea surface temperature which suggests that G. bulloides calcification might have been controlled by surface water [CO sup(=) sub(3)]. Therefore it is suggested here that shell weights of G. ruber and G. bulloides cannot be utilized to reconstruct surface water [CO sup(=) sub(3)] in this region. Article in Journal/Newspaper Planktonic foraminifera National Institute of Oceanography, India: Digital Repository Service (DRS@nio)
institution Open Polar
collection National Institute of Oceanography, India: Digital Repository Service (DRS@nio)
op_collection_id ftnio
language English
topic calcification
foraminifera
surface water
Globigerina bulloides
spellingShingle calcification
foraminifera
surface water
Globigerina bulloides
Naik, S.S.
Godad, S.P.
Naidu, P.D.
Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?
topic_facet calcification
foraminifera
surface water
Globigerina bulloides
description Planktonic foraminifera shell weights have been recognized as possible proxy for surface water carbonate ion concentration [CO sup(=) sub(3)] and atmospheric CO sub(2). However, to utilize this proxy, it is important to understand whether shell weights truly reflect surface water [CO sup(=) sub(3)]. We utilize shell weights of Globigerina bulloides and Globigerinoides ruber in the size range of 300 to 355 mu m from a sediment core recovered from above the lysocline in the upwelling region of western Arabian Sea. Shell weights of G. ruber and G. bulloides show significant correlation with their shell size from recent to 16 kyr, which suggests that shell calcification was controlled by optimum growth conditions. On the other hand, during 16 to 22 kyr, there is no correlation between shell weights and shell size. However, shell weights of G. bulloides exhibit significant negative correlation with annual sea surface temperature which suggests that G. bulloides calcification might have been controlled by surface water [CO sup(=) sub(3)]. Therefore it is suggested here that shell weights of G. ruber and G. bulloides cannot be utilized to reconstruct surface water [CO sup(=) sub(3)] in this region.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Naik, S.S.
Godad, S.P.
Naidu, P.D.
author_facet Naik, S.S.
Godad, S.P.
Naidu, P.D.
author_sort Naik, S.S.
title Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?
title_short Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?
title_full Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?
title_fullStr Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?
title_full_unstemmed Does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?
title_sort does carbonate ion control planktonic foraminifera shell calcification in upwelling regions?
publisher Current Science Association
publishDate 2011
url http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/3970
genre Planktonic foraminifera
genre_facet Planktonic foraminifera
op_rights Copyright [2011]. All efforts have been made to respect the copyright to the best of our knowledge. Inadvertent omissions, if brought to our notice, stand for correction and withdrawal of document from this repository.
_version_ 1766169729533214720